Jump to content

User talk:Wipka

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, Wipka! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages.
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 22:22, 21 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 17:37, 26 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, Wipka! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 17:37, 26 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

"Unconnected" statements in NCRI lead

[edit]

Hello, you have twice removed the word "however" from the lead section of the article for the National Council of Resistance of Iran, claiming that there is "no connection" or "no contrast" between the claims of NCRI being 'an independent parliament' and 'a political wing of MeK'. But these sentences are connected. It is not possible to be an independent parliament which is a wing, i.e. subsidiary, of another organization. That is not independence. Could you clarify your issue with the "however"? Theodore Christopher (talk) 00:42, 2 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

The issue isn't about whether the two statements could be seen as contradictory in a broader sense, but about whether the contrast is explicitly established in the text. The sentence "It describes itself as an independent parliament-in-exile..." merely states how the NCRI defines itself, while the next sentence "The organization is often described by academics and journalists as the political or diplomatic wing of the MEK" reports how others describe it. These are two factual statements presenting differing perspectives, not a logical contrast or rebuttal. Introducing "However" suggests that the second sentence is directly opposing or refuting the first, which overstates the relationship between them. In neutral encyclopedic writing, it's preferable to present both descriptions without implying contradiction unless reliable sources explicitly frame it as such. Wipka (talk) 07:43, 8 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Hi, just rewrote the lead section. Don't think it's too radical of a change, but if you're interested, go ahead and take a look. Also, I neglected to reply and didn't include a "however" in the rewrite, but reliable sources do set up a contrast between the claimed independence of NCRI and its inextricable link to MEK. Including some of the ones in my groupcite. Theodore Christopher (talk) 17:34, 16 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 18 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:1992 Mashhad protests has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:1992 Mashhad protests. Thanks! Zalaraz (talk) 00:46, 8 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Assassination and extrajudicial killing of MEK members by the Islamic Republic of Iran, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add a title to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help). Below are the references causing this error:
    • Iran International. 22 July 2024 https://www.iranintl.com/en/202407225850. Retrieved 12 August 2026. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
    • (Report). Amnesty International. 2018 https://www.amnesty.org/fr/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/MDE1394212018ENGLISH.pdf. {{cite report}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:22, 12 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1992 Mashhad protests has been accepted

[edit]
1992 Mashhad protests, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

FuzzyMagma (talk) 16:02, 13 August 2026 (UTC)Reply