Jump to content

User talk:VortexPhantom

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 days ago by JacobTheRox in topic Good article nominations RfC

Honorific

[edit]

Honorifics are not allowed on Wikipedia, unless they are so commonly attached to a person's name, that it's almost impossible to find the name without honorific in "reliable english sources", which is not the case with Shri and Krishna, there is not even single reliable source provided where Krishna is addressed as "Shri Krishna" evenly throughout the whole source. You provided a source which just uses Shri on the title of the one of the chapters in the book once and that too not for Krishna but for Jagannatha. Also, Shri is in no way exclusive to Krishna for any of the special feats he achieved or any honour he got, to use it as honorific in infobox, similar to knighthood honorifics i.e. Lord, Sir, etc. It's used as a common honorific for many Hindu gods e.g. Shri Rama, Shri Ganesha, Shri Hari and Krishna is just one of them. It's even a common honorific for humans too. Please read WP: honorifics Hbanm (talk) 10:55, 4 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

I see your concern but I have a valid reason behind it as Shri is mostly used as a honorific prefix, but here it's denoting Lakshmi, reflecting his attribution to Radha and Rukmini, no matter they both are considered an incarnation of Lakshmi. In Hinduism, it is commonly practiced to add consort's names before the name of deity and also included in formal writings. More specifically, Shri is used here as an epithet of Lakshmi. I can also locate a TV series on the exact name Shri Krishna by Ramanand Sagar. I think this will give you a more clearer picture. Feel free to argue if you still disagree, I am always here to help you out.
Thank you, have a nice day. PhantomVorteX (Talk) 12:29, 15 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Shri before Krishna is a honorific and not Lakshmi, please provide reliable sources for your claim. Also, there is no practice in Hinduism to add consort's name before deity (Lakshmi-Narayana, Uma-Maheshwara are divine couples, not a single deity), please support your claim with reliable sources. And most importantly, you can't add it as per WP: honorific. Hbanm (talk) 15:54, 15 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Who told you that honorific is not allowed in Wikipedia? See Issac Newton, where Sir is placed as honorific in the infobox, i, then I want you to go and try to remove that honorific, because you are just saying so. See Shri#Usage which regards Shri as an epithet of Lakshmi in the very first paragraph. Sita-Ram, Gauri-Shankar is not a pair of deity but a combined form, of which I am talking about here. Be relax and just try to understand what I mean. PhantomVorteX (Talk) 11:37, 16 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Who told me? I recommend you to see WP: honorifics but I think you are not interested in reading and understanding Wikipedia guidelines and policies, it's clearly evident from your questions and arguments. Sir, Lord as a honorific can only be used when a person gets knighthood honour by government, monarchy, etc or holds any specific position to get this honour. Issac Newton got that honour, as he was knighted by Queen Anne of England in 1705, it's not a general honorific. "Shri" is a goddess in Vedas and epithet of Lakshmi and is also a general honorific, it doesn't mean that prefix "Shri" before anyone's name is goddess "Shri" and not honorific. Shri prefix before Krishna or any other god for that matter is a general honorific and not goddess "Shri", you are claiming it otherwise, provide reliable english sources for your claims. There is nothing for me to understand, Wikipedia works on reliable sources, guidelines and policies not on personal understanding. Also, Sita-Ram, Gauri-Shankar is a combined form, as per you, right? But article Krishna is for a singular deity and not a combined form, there you go. Hbanm (talk) 13:24, 16 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Question from Bohique1964 (22:30, 16 July 2026)

[edit]

Hello! I would like to edit articles about Rituxan (rituximab). How do I

find them? --Bohique1964 (talk) 22:30, 16 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Articles for Creation backlog drive

[edit]

Hello VortexPhantom:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive in August!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than a month of outstanding reviews from the current 3+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 August 2026 through 31 August 2026.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 5000 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 19 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

May 2026 Administrator Elections – RFC Phase

[edit]

The RFC phase of the May 2026 administrator elections has started. There are 20 RFCs for consideration. You can participate in the RFC phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/May 2026/RFC phase.

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:02, 20 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin 2026 Issue 13

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:23, 22 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Question from خرا بطيخ (22:25, 23 July 2026)

[edit]

مرحبا كيف اقوم بأنشاء مرجع --خرا بطيخ (talk) 22:25, 23 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

x

[edit]

x Rxsam1 (talk) 22:52, 24 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Question from Jeyca la melodía (03:40, 26 July 2026)

[edit]

Hola quisiera saber cómo registra en wikipedia mi nombre artístico --Jeyca la melodía (talk) 03:40, 26 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 2 August 2026

[edit]
  • On the bright side: The beautiful game
    2026 Men's FIFA World Cup, Wikimania music, and wikipress.
  • Traffic report: Odyssey and Oyarzabal
    To take you in the sun to (Ithaca), to show you the World Cup, it's the time of the season for editing!

Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin 2026 Issue 14

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 22:24, 4 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – August 2026

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2026).

Administrator changes

added
removed

CheckUser changes

readded

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Miscellaneous


Good article nominations RfC

[edit]

Hi VortexPhantom,

There is an ongoing Request for Comment (RfC) at Wikipedia:Good article nominations/August 2026 RfC, which you may be interested in because in the past year, you have nominated or reviewed more than one good article nomination. This message has also been sent to all subscribers to the Good Article Gazette. The RfC contains many proposals (33 at the time of writing), which are split into the following categories: nominators, reviewers, reviews, volunteer roles, reviewing initiatives, and others. However, you are more than welcome to add any proposals of your own that you wish to put to the community.

By the end of September, all the proposals will have been closed by an uninvolved editor, either as a consensus for one of the options or with no consensus. At this point, editors will be invited again to develop these proposals into coherent policy and implement them.

Thank you for your contributions to the good articles project, and I look forward to your input! (in solidarity), JacobTheRox(talk|contributions) 16:03, 11 August 2026 (UTC)Reply