User talk:Supreme Deliciousness
Please stop your harassment
Please stop reverting my edits to articles about the Golan Heights. You are not in charge of them (WP:OWN), and your reversion of my edits on pages such as Merom Golan and United States recognition of the Golan Heights as part of Israel, not to mention your edit of Route 959 (Golan Heights) a mere 5 minutes after I did, after no one else had edited it for more than two years, clearly crosses the line into harassment.
To respond to your comments, 1) an article about one country making a geopolitical change (i.e. recognizing Israel's sovereignty over the Golan Heights) is obviously related to news about another country making that exact same change, and 100% deserves to be in the article. And 2) Yes, Colombia's recognition should be included in all articles about cities and villages in the Golan. (Note how I didn't change the section you added.) Your personal bias is clearly showing - just because you personally don't agree with what Colombia did doesn't mean it shouldn't be included. Your personal opinion is not the only valid one here.
I should also note that you reverted two edits on articles related to the Arab-Israeli conflict in less than 24 hours, which is specifically not allowed.
Moral of the story, you need to back off and stop harassing me and reverting my edits. ProudNewEnglander (talk) 01:24, 12 August 2026 (UTC)
- I have no idea what you are talking about regarding "harassment", all my edits are valid. Colombia recognition about GH should not be in Merom golan or other Israeli settlement articles. Route 959 states "Country: Israel" this is obviously incorrect and a violation of npov. If you have any issues about any of my edits, take it to the articles talkpages.--Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 18:37, 15 August 2026 (UTC)
- Although it can be argued that US recognition has real consequences, recognition by Colombia's new far-right government has no effect on anything at all except for bilateral relations between those countries (which is a different topic). In my opinion it is simply absurd to claim that this trivial event has to go in every article on Golan locations. Also, regarding your comments about another editor's "personal bias", you might be wise to read WP:NPA and the essay WP:POTKETTLE. Zerotalk 02:22, 12 August 2026 (UTC)
- Actually, Colombia's recognition has one important effect. The claim on many WP pages that "The international community considers Israeli settlements in the Golan Heights illegal under international law, but the Israeli government disputes this" gives the impression that every country in the world, except for Israel, considers Israeli settlements in the Golan Heights to be illegal. That hasn't been true since 2019 (when America recognized the Golan Heights as part of Israel), and it is even less true now with Colombia doing the same. Therefore, that statement needs to be amended just slightly to clarify that, while most countries still do consider Israeli settlements in the Golan Heights to be illegal, the United States and Colombia disagree with that. This is the change I have been making. If you have ideas to clarify this, I'm happy to hear them. ProudNewEnglander (talk) 12:18, 12 August 2026 (UTC)
- You are mistaken. The phrase "international community considers" means "the international consensus is". It does not indicate anything about every single country. Zerotalk 09:34, 13 August 2026 (UTC)
- Actually, Colombia's recognition has one important effect. The claim on many WP pages that "The international community considers Israeli settlements in the Golan Heights illegal under international law, but the Israeli government disputes this" gives the impression that every country in the world, except for Israel, considers Israeli settlements in the Golan Heights to be illegal. That hasn't been true since 2019 (when America recognized the Golan Heights as part of Israel), and it is even less true now with Colombia doing the same. Therefore, that statement needs to be amended just slightly to clarify that, while most countries still do consider Israeli settlements in the Golan Heights to be illegal, the United States and Colombia disagree with that. This is the change I have been making. If you have ideas to clarify this, I'm happy to hear them. ProudNewEnglander (talk) 12:18, 12 August 2026 (UTC)
- (Arrived here through random scrolling lol). I won’t comment on the user conduct conversation because I don’t care… but, to @ProudNewEnglander: most of your suggestions and ideas have been reasonable, even if I don’t agree with them. However, this opinion: “Yes, Colombia's recognition should be included in all articles about cities and villages in the Golan.”, seems a tad extreme. I’d advise slowing down and taking a larger view of the Golan Heights and its recognition (and lack thereof) as Israeli territory. Colombia’s recognition is extremely recent, and ultimately changes very little about the global situation. I’m not saying you shouldn’t try and put information about it into articles, because it does have some importance. But, I simply advise you to slow down and edit in a more reserved manner. As long as you are following policy and being sensible, I have your back as a fellow editor. 296cherry (talk) 21:50, 15 August 2026 (UTC)