User talk:SnorMonster

August 2026

Hello, I'm TurquoiseGoose. I noticed that one or more of your recent contribution attempts to Hard problem of consciousness have been disallowed by an edit filter as they did not appear constructive. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. If you believe the edit filter disallowance was a false positive, please report it. Feel free to ask for assistance at the Teahouse whenever you like. - TurquoiseGoose•they/them•(talk) 09:19, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Please do not insert fringe or undue weight content into articles. An article should not give undue weight to any aspects of the subject but should strive to treat each aspect with a weight appropriate to its significance to the subject. Please use the article's talk page to discuss the material and its appropriate weight within the article. Thank you. - TurquoiseGoose•they/them•(talk) 09:22, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Modified Newtonian dynamics, you may be blocked from editing. - TurquoiseGoose•they/them•(talk) 09:23, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at AI alignment. Disruptive editing. (WS) - TurquoiseGoose•they/them•(talk) 09:26, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for the warnings, TurquoiseGoose — I understand and I will stop. I will not re-insert that material into articles or restore reverted edits. Going forward I will keep experiments in my sandbox / userspace drafts, and use article talk pages (and seek consensus) before proposing anything for mainspace. Apologies for the disruption. — SnorMonster (talk) 09:27, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for acknowledging this. Just a heads up, it looks like you're creating subpages in your sandbox for your proposed changes to each article; other editors are not gonna see those there, instead you should consider starting a discussion on a relevant article's talk page. I'm not familiar with the subject, but by the looks of it it looks to be a fringe theory and the reference is a primary source rather than secondary coverage. As such, it probably doesn't deserve too much words, if at all, and certainly not on so many articles that you edited. - TurquoiseGoose•they/them•(talk) 09:32, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Understood — I will keep the sandbox as a personal workspace only, and open a small number of article talk discussions (not a wide spread across many pages), asking whether any brief mention is due at all given the primary/self-published sourcing. Thank you for the clarification. — SnorMonster (talk) 09:35, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Also, I wanted to check in, are you using AI/LLM for content or communications here? - TurquoiseGoose•they/them•(talk) 09:36, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm TurquoiseGoose. An edit that you recently made seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is not allowed on Wikipedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or ask your questions at the Teahouse, a friendly place for new users. Thanks. - TurquoiseGoose•they/them•(talk) 09:40, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Thanks — I hear you. I will avoid pasting model-generated article text into Wikipedia, keep practice work in my sandbox, and stick to talk-page questions / one AfC draft for review (User:SnorMonster/The 420 Code) rather than editing articles directly. — SnorMonster (talk) 09:46, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Looks like you're still using LLM for communication here? - TurquoiseGoose•they/them•(talk) 09:47, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm TurquoiseGoose. A comment that you recently posted seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Editors should not use LLMs to write comments generatively. Communication is at the root of Wikipedia's decision-making process, and it is presumed that editors possess the ability to come up with their own ideas. Your comment may have been collapsed per the relevant guideline. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.- TurquoiseGoose•they/them•(talk) 09:48, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Putting the same nonsense on numerous talk pages is disruptive editing, too, even if it's not in the main articles. --mfb (talk) 14:57, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The 420 Code (August 8)

Draft rejected
Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted.

Reason for rejection

The reviewer, Bonadea, left the following feedback:

The subject does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion.

Like the draft says, the topic is not notable. In addition, this is clearly an LLM generated text, and will be deleted as such.

Next steps

• If you have discovered significant new sources or believe this rejection was an error, you may ask the reviewer to reconsider on their talk page.
• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

bonadea contributions talk 10:53, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

August 2026

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for running unapproved bot scripts.

Under the bot policy, all automated scripts must be approved by the Bot Approvals Group to ensure that they perform safe and useful functions without stressing system resources.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request through the unblock wizard or through your talk page.  Staraction (talk · contribs) 23:31, 8 August 2026 (UTC)