User talk:Simmaren

Welcome to Novels WikiProject

Hi, and welcome to the Novels WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to fiction books often referred to as "Novels".

A few features that you might find helpful:

• Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
• The announcement and open task box is updated quite regularly. You can watch it if you're interested; or, you can add it directly to your user page by including {{WikiProject_Novels_announcements}} there.
  While you are updating your userpage, don't forget our userbox {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Outreach/User WPNOVELS}}.
• The project has a monthly newsletter; it will normally be delivered as a link, but other methods are available.

There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

• Starting some new articles? Our article structure guidelines / template outlines some things to include.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the members, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! :: Kevinalewis : ^{(Talk Page)}/_(Desk) 07:37, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

A Talent for War

All seems very good - I has raised its class to "B" - all I can add is some more by way of critical reviews and literary significance would be good. Also are there more rewards and nominations that came its way.! :: Kevinalewis : ^{(Talk Page)}/_(Desk) 08:12, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Your Userboxes

The top one here looks good, the bottom 3 show four vertical bars |||| : lots of folks don't have the Eastern languages systems installed. --Lexein 22:11, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

• • Thanks for pointing that out - I hadn't thought about the problem of showing Eastern languages. I'll change all of the ID boxes to show the feather as in # 1. Simmaren 22:35, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
    • Oh, I thought images of the chars would be cool, and platform-independant. --Lexein 02:44, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

• • • I agree that they're cool. What I may do when I have time is produce another set with the Japanese characters, then note for people why they may want to use one set or another. Simmaren 02:50, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Jane Austen

Thank you for the note, Simmaren. I am glad to see that someone is working on Jane Austen! Next time, though, consider posting on my main talk page. I haven't worked on my own Jane Austen draft in months and I almost missed your post among all the other recently-updated pages on my watchlist — it appears that the orange "You have new messages" alert only works when posts are made to your main talk page. I appreciate the invitation to review and comment on your Jane Austen revision and will do so a bit later. -Severa (!!!) 00:51, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Jane Austen

I am so happy that someone is dedicated to improving the Austen page (it is a travesty at the moment). I wonder if you would be interested in working together on your draft. I am a graduate student specializing in eighteenth-century British literature, so I would be more than happy to help out with the sections you have not yet completed. I can also offer a long list of helpful scholarly sources. See Mary Wollstonecraft, Anna Laetitia Barbauld and Sarah Trimmer for examples of authorial biographies that I have written. Awadewit | talk 05:08, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Wiki editing tool

I wondered if you were using a wiki editing tool like wikEd. It makes reading wiki-code much easier because everything is color-coded. Awadewit | talk 18:27, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

The Wrongs of Woman

If you have any time in the next few weeks, would you mind peer-reviewing the article I wrote on Wollstonecraft's Maria: or, The Wrongs of Woman? I'm afraid that it hasn't elicited much interest at the peer-review pages. I have struggled with the organization of the article, so I'm wondering how to reads to someone who hasn't been immersed in Wollstonecraft scholarship for the past year. :) Awadewit | talk 01:35, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Apologies

Sorry I haven't been very productive over the last few days - I have been immersed in the William Shakespeare FAC and the disasters arising at the FAC for an article I submitted. I hope to be back to full strength in a day or two, although the FAC may make me swear off FACs forever. Apparently my writing is atrocious. I warn you now. :) Awadewit | talk 08:02, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Austen novels

Do you want to read the Austen novels together? We could have little chats about them over virtual tea. Awadewit | talk 12:16, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Almost done...

I'm sorry I haven't added any notes recently. I am almost done with my Mary Wollstonecraft featured topic. I have two articles at FAC right now and one more to polish up and then I will be done! (I'm not even going to think about bringing all the possible Wollstonecraft-related articles up to FA at the moment.) Once that process has been completed, I will be back full-tilt, full-steam, etc. Awadewit | talk 04:34, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

• Oh. My. God. (By the way, we should decide AE or BE for JA - I can promise this will happen for her, too.) Awadewit | talk 00:06, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Southam

Did you read any of Southam? There are three volumes and I was just wondering if you had read any of it already. :) Awadewit | talk 02:43, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

How tiresome

The AE/BE debate has now spilled over into a discussion of our potential article. See here and here. It all began here, if you want to see the huge, initial debate. I thought you might want to comment. You at least deserve to be made aware of this mess. Sorry I dragged JA into it. Awadewit | talk 18:59, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

• I'm confident Jane Austen can take care of herself.
• I hope you will do likewise.
• The idea to "hire" a translator was mine, offered in anticipation of this awful day. :) Know anyone good?
• I'll think about whether I want to put my oar into this discussion. You've said the right things (as usual) so I'm not sure I can add anything new. Let me know, though, if more battalions are needed on the side of the angels.
• I quibble with your description of our article as "potential." It seems real enough to me. Perhaps "incipient" or "emerging" or "eagerly anticipated" are better adjectives. :) Simmaren 22:47, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

The only thing I thought you might want to add was that we had indeed considered the AE/BE issue and were going to bring in a BE expert. I may inadvertently have said I suggested the translation somewhere in the long debate - I just didn't remember. Sorry about that - you could correct that. One should always give credit where credit is due. There is no reason for you to get down into the mud on this one - it is just that little bit that I thought might need notarization. :) (Sorry about "potential" - my brain is fuzzy right now.) Awadewit | talk 22:52, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:A Talent For War1.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:A Talent For War1.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:27, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:A Talent For War2.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:A Talent For War2.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:28, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Hello

I hope all is well. I am desperately trying to finish my notes so that I can start drafting in earnest. How are things going for you? Awadewit | talk 06:49, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Timeline of Jane Austen

The timeline has been live for two days now and nothing of note has happened, either positively or negatively. Interesting in its own way. I started looking through the talk page of Jane Austen. You might want to do that as well. I'm not sure that we're going to have as much help from regular reviewers as we thought. :) Perhaps we'll gain some along the way. I hope you had a relaxing holiday. Awadewit | talk 02:13, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Of course you may. Glad I could help Awadewit and a fellow typophile :) Best, Fvasconcellos (t·c) 03:08, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Contest

I'm going to see if we can enter Wikipedia:The Core Contest - Austen is on the list! We could win $100! Even my half would come in handy around the holidays. :) Awadewit | talk 02:24, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

• What do you think about posting the first half of the Austen article? I'm curious to see if anyone responds on the Austen page, frankly. We are also at that point where we are just refining. That may be best done live. Once we move the text, we lose the history. Any debates about what to include or not should probably start taking place on the Austen page, if you know what I mean. Awadewit | talk 12:31, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

• Yes. Please do. I assume you will call in Mr. Davies to perform his Anglicising magic?

• Will do, on both counts. Awadewit | talk 13:21, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

• Which part is the first half? The biography? Your call, but I am inclined to put in the whole thing. We announced what we're doing a long time ago and people have had the chance to watch us (and to contribute).

• What I meant was everything written out - not the sketchy outline part. Awadewit | talk 13:21, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

• I'm curious as well. The (non-)response to adding the timeline is encouraging, although it's hard to see what anyone could object to and it's not very visible (something to address). I'm more encouraged by the lack of response to your move of the media section. I thought that might be a flash point.

• I am encouraged as well. :) Awadewit | talk 13:21, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

• The history remains with the sandbox draft where any antiquarian can look at it who is interested. :)
• In another place, you mentioned cutting back the reception piece. I like its scope as it is - it's a large topic and deserves a few paragraphs.

• We'll see what happens when we start writing the "Style" section - I feel that section should feel prominently. I'll try to start drafting that in the next few days, if you think the outline is good. Awadewit | talk 13:21, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

• Work has not tapered off much, but I will have some time this weekend to put in.
• Good work, and thanks. (Cheers in background) Simmaren (talk) 13:01, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Core Contest Award

		2008 Core Contest Winner Award
		Let it be known that Simmaren and Awadewit were awarded Best Overall and Best Collaborative Effort in the first Wikipedia Core Contest. This award is based on their outstanding work in improving Jane Austen. Thanks for your hard work in making Wikipedia's core articles better. -Earthdirt (talk) 04:11, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

FAC

Watch what can happen at FAC: Wikipedia: Featured article candidates/Analytical Review. :) Awadewit | talk 20:54, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Read it. I'm glad you can still smile. Simmaren (talk) 21:43, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Encyclopédie

So, are you thinking Encyclopédie in 2009? :) I've longed to work on that article because I think Wikipedia should have a good article on the first real encyclopedia. Maybe we could get Willow to help - she did Britannica. Awadewit | talk 02:11, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

• Yes. Timing open. You're right about it being disgraceful. I'd love to work with you both on it. I also "to do'd" yesterday's Main Page FA on John Day (printer). It's good but the references are thin. The new book by Raven isn't listed as a reference and it has lots of stuff on him. A task for another day.Simmaren (talk) 03:29, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

• My "another days" seem to stretch into infinity. I'll check with Willow and sees if she is interested in working on it when we're done with JA. I really can't start another big project right now. :) Awadewit | talk 04:41, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

• Willow is on board for 2009. :) Awadewit | talk 01:31, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

JA timeline

What do you think about getting a peer review of the Timeline of Jane Austen and taking it through WP:FLC? Timeline of Mary Wollstonecraft is a featured list, so I'm sure JA can be as well. I don't think either of us is planning on buying the 1,000 page Le Faye chronology and making a day-by-day chronology of JA's life, which I don't think would be that useful anyway - for the average reader. Awadewit | talk 01:35, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

• Let's go for it. It's very good, and appears to me to meet the FLC. Almost entirely your work, so I get to say so. ;-) Simmaren (talk) 17:12, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
• Does Tony1 hang about WP:FAC? Does he have cousins who do? What was your experience with the MW timeline? Simmaren (talk) 17:12, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
• I agree that this chronology is at about the right level of detail. I envision the target readership as high school, college and first year graduate students in literature, literary history or just plain history who need context for further research. As a starting place for them, it's a treasure house. Simmaren (talk) 17:12, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
• Le Faye is for scholars, although it might not be a bad idea to include a reference to it to point the way for those who need more detail. Do you have (access to) the necessary biblio info? Are there other similar resources known to you that could be added? Simmaren (talk) 17:12, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
• The lead needs more work, I think, but I'm unclear in my own mind how much. It seems a little too long and too much like the lead to the JA Article, which has a different purpose. I'm going to fiddle with it a bit - I'm concerned about messing up the footnotes but we can revert it and start again if necessary. Simmaren (talk) 17:12, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
• I haven't checked the images. Are you confident that they all have acceptable copyright status? Simmaren (talk) 17:13, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
• I'm going to add a cross-reference "for further information and references" at the top to the JA article. Simmaren (talk) 17:12, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

• Good points all - I will start dealing with them (do you mind if I copy this list to the talk page of the article?). What do you think about a peer review? I have found that a peer review is necessary to an easy FLC/FAC. My experience with the MW timeline was rocky, but they had never had such a timeline of this nature before at FLC. I'm hoping that if we go through PR first and note that this is based on the already featured MW timeline, things should be easier. My only concern is that the JA material is too detailed. Compared to the MW timeline, there is much more information. I wonder whether people are going to say "do we care that she traveled so much?" I think it is necessary to understanding her precarious economic status, etc. Another reason for a PR and a slight revision of the lead. Awadewit | talk 17:28, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

• Why would I mind? Makes sense to me to preserve the discussion where it's relevant.
• I made some changes in the lead that should help, mainly to conform it to what's been done in the lead to the main article.
• Yes to peer review. I agree that it should be helpful.
• I don't intend an invidious comparison between JA and MW, but given the importance WP itself attaches to JA, the detail shouldn't be objectionable. I agree with your point about the detail being necessary to understanding JA's life/work. We can also point out in an "incrementalist" way (if I understand the term correctly) that this type of time line is the "coming thing" at WP. We can always point to Le Faye's chronology to show the lengths to which we could have gone. Moreover, the organization and graphic sophistication of the presentation should make it manageable for its intended audience. Simmaren (talk) 17:57, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

• I will put it up for peer review and then solicit some feedback in the next few days. Awadewit | talk 18:13, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

19th-century novels task force

Hi, Simmaren. I'm starting up a 19th-century novels task force for WP:NOVELS. This would cover the works of many well-known authors, including Jane Austen, Charles Dickens, Mark Twain, Victor Hugo and Leo Tolstoy. If you think you'd be interested in supporting or participating in the task force, please let me know. Cheers. – Liveste [talk • contrib] 10:41, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Jane's tree

Drafts:

• Descent from William Austen, including siblings
• Jane's nephews and nieces, showing Jane's siblings and their marriages only if they have children.

I've let Awadewit know too. Feedback either on my talk page or on the image talk page would work. Let me know what you'd like changed, and if there are errors. Mike Christie (talk) 18:52, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

• Whatever you guys decide to do is fine with me. Awadewit | talk 19:58, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Novels - 1st Coordinators Election

An election has been proposed and has been set up for this project. Description of the roles etc., can be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Coordinators. If you wish to stand, enter your candidacy before the end of March and ask your questions of anyone already standing at Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Coordinators/May 2008. Voting will start on the 1st April and close at the end of April. The intention is for the appointments to last from May - November 2008. For other details check out the pages or ask. KevinalewisBot (talk) 13:58, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

The Hobbit - copyediting

Hi Simmaren, I've requested the League of Copyeditors take a look at The Hobbit. Your feedback on the article (re citations for adaptations etc.) a while back was invaluable, and would welcome your input on further improving it. --Davémon (talk) 20:21, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

WP:LOTD

Congratulations on getting what appears to be your first successful WP:FL during the last month. You may want to get involved in our List of the Day and List of the Month experiment. Feel free to help us select next months lists at User:TonyTheTiger/List of the Day/voting/200805 or nominate your list for consideration to be a LOTD in June at User:TonyTheTiger/List of the Day/Nominees/200806.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 18:24, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XXIV - May 2008

The May 2008 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. SteveCrossinBot (talk) 08:18, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Patrick O'Who?

Hi - just passing ... I see that on your user page you refer to the writer "Patrick O'Brien". Are you sure you don't mean Patrick O'Brian? I was going to correct it for you, and then I thought that would be a bit impertinent. SNALWIBMA ( talk - contribs ) 19:54, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

• Thanks for calling this to my attention. I've corrected the error. I appreciate your courtesy and don't think I would have minded your correction if accompanied by a note here. At least, on a good day. ;) Simmaren (talk) 22:04, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Welcome back!

I hope all is well! Let me know how you want to progress with Austen. Qp and I are finishing up Mary Shelley, so it will be a bit before I can start working again, but I am anxious to! Awadewit (talk) 21:12, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Reception history of Jane Austen

This article is now at FAC. Please sign the nominating statement and adjust it as you see fit. Awadewit (talk) 17:50, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

• As you know, done. Simmaren (talk) 20:31, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Absolutely! Only the song itself pokes fun of the so-called universal truth from the woman's POV in a silly, earworm sort of way. :) María (habla conmigo) 18:53, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Oh, it's great fun. Some parts are just too goofy not to laugh at, but the music is catchy and the story is, of course, timeless; so I hope even the most discerning critics in your house are able to enjoy it. (I was actually high on cough medicine when I went to see it with friends, but I'm sure it's just as good sober!) María (habla conmigo) 19:45, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Core contest

I know that it didn't work with the reward for the core contest and I'm willing to sponsor it by sending a package of quality lebkuchen. All I need is an adress. My email is kurt.scholz[at]gmx.de. In case you have reservations, sending me your adress User:Proteins has agreed to handle the distribution. Greetings Wandalstouring (talk) 20:20, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Talk:Patricianship#Merger_proposal

Hi, thank you for your recent contribution to discussion. I have posted an updated proposal for changes, please feel free to comment on the Talk page.--Goodmorningworld (talk) 16:59, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Congrats!

Aw, thanks, but of course most of the credit goes to those who actually appreciate Austen. Ours is still a love/hate relationship. :) I'm glad you guys have another FA under the collective belt, and I look forward to seeing the next Austen collaboration. My projects next year will be far less ambitious than the first encyclopedia, however -- pushy environmentalists and angsty poets and such. But keep me posted! I'll gladly help where I'm able. María (habla conmigo) 02:55, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

For a wonderful and patient collaborator

		The Literary Barnstar
		Thank you for your meticulous work on Reception history of Jane Austen - it has been such a pleasure to work on this article with you. I have thoroughly enjoyed ferreting out the publication details of Bentley's Standard Novel series, choosing just the right words to describe all those different Janeites, and reading all of those wonderful reviews of Austen's novels. I look forward to collaborating with you on future Austen articles. Awadewit (talk) 03:46, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

A noiseless patient spider, I mark'd where on a little promontory it stood isolated, Mark'd how to explore the vacant vast surrounding, It launch'd forth filament, filament, filament, out of itself, Ever unreeling them, ever tirelessly speeding them. And you O my soul where you stand, Surrounded, detached, in measureless oceans of space, Ceaselessly musing, venturing, throwing, seeking the spheres to connect them, Till the bridge you will need be form'd, till the ductile anchor hold, Till the gossamer thread you fling catch somewhere, O my soul." —"A Noiseless Patient Spider" by Walt Whitman Happy New Year Awadewit (talk) 05:53, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Adding notes

I don't think there is any reason to add substantially to our Austen notes at this point - we already have way too much material. Awadewit (talk) 22:09, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

• O.K., just distracted. Simmaren (talk) 22:31, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

• Just pointing out that way lies madness. :) Awadewit (talk) 23:39, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

• Some would argue that I've already traveled a good distance down that road. Simmaren (talk) 12:48, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Credo Reference offer

Hi Simmaren. Credo is offering free accounts to qualified Wikipedia editors and I thought of you, though I imagine that as a practising attorney you probably have all these sources to hand anyway. If not, you might find Credo's offer useful. - Pointillist (talk) 23:09, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

New Jane Austen portal

Hi there, based upon your great work on Jane Austen-related articles, I thought I'd let you know I created Portal:Jane Austen. You are more than welcome to put your name down at Portal:Jane Austen/Editors if you're interested. Let me know if you have any queries. Thanks! Ruby 2010/2013 21:23, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

TFAR

I thought of Reception history of Jane Austen for TFA, please join the discussion and trim the blurb ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:57, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

1. RECIPIENTS (CATEGORY) -->

Main Page appearance

Hello! This is a note to let the main editors of the article Timeline of Jane Austen know that it will be appearing as the main page featured list on December 17, 2012. You can view the TFL blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured list/December 17, 2012. If you think it is necessary to change the main date, you can request it with the featured list directors The Rambling Man (talk · contribs), Dabomb87 (talk · contribs) or Giants2008 (talk · contribs), or at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured list. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions of the suggested formatting. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :D Thanks! Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 06:05, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

For her entire life, Jane Austen (illustration pictured) lived as part of a family located socially and economically on the lower fringes of the English gentry. She was primarily educated at home by her father and older brothers and through her own reading. Her apprenticeship as a writer lasted from her teenage years until she was about thirty-five years old. During this period, she wrote three major novels and began a fourth. From 1811 until 1815, with the release of Sense and Sensibility, Pride and Prejudice, Mansfield Park, and Emma, she achieved success as a published writer. She wrote two additional novels, Northanger Abbey and Persuasion, both published after her death in 1817, and began a third, eventually titled Sanditon, but died before it could be completed. Austen published all of her novels in the Regency period, during which King George III was declared permanently insane and his son was appointed as prince regent. Throughout most of Austen's adult life, Britain was at war with revolutionary France.

Main page appearance: reception history of Jane Austen

This is a note to let the main editors of reception history of Jane Austen know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on January 28, 2013. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/January 28, 2013. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director Raul654 (talk · contribs) or his delegates Dabomb87 (talk · contribs), Gimmetoo (talk · contribs), and Bencherlite (talk · contribs), or start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you can change it—following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. The blurb as it stands now is below:

The reception history of Jane Austen follows a path from modest fame to wild popularity; her novels are both the subject of intense scholarly study and the centre of a diverse fan culture. Austen, the author of such works as Pride and Prejudice (1813) and Emma (1815), is one of the best-known and widely read novelists in the English language. During her lifetime, Austen's novels brought her little personal fame; like many women writers, she published anonymously. At the time they were published, her works were considered fashionable by members of high society but received few positive reviews. By the mid-19th century, her novels were admired by members of the literary elite, but it was not until the 1940s that Austen was widely accepted in academia as a "great English novelist". The second half of the 20th century saw a proliferation of scholarship exploring artistic, ideological and historical aspects of her works. As of the early 21st century, Austen fandom supports an industry of printed sequels and prequels as well as television and film adaptations, which started with the 1940 Pride and Prejudice and includes the 2004 Bollywood-style production Bride and Prejudice. (Full article...)

UcuchaBot (talk) 23:02, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Precious

reception history of Jane Austen
Thank you for quality contributions in teamwork around the Reception history of Jane Austen, her timeline, themes, style, family, juvenilia, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:45, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

A year ago, you were the 379th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:12, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

On a personal note: I love the alternative design by a missed friend, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Three years ago, you were recipient no. 379 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:29, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

January

Lanzarote
... with thanks from QAI

Thank you today again for Reception history of Jane Austen, in fond memory! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:11, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Seven years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:19, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 April 2014

• News and notes: Round 2 of FDC funding open to public comments
  Community review is open for the four applications in the second and final round of applications to the WMF's Funds Dissemination Committee for 2013–14. Three eligible organisations have applied for funding under the newly named "annual program grants": Wikimedia France, Wikimedia Norway, and the India-based Centre for Internet and Society, which last November was recognised as eligible to apply for FDC funding purposes.

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Law
  This week, we interviewed the Law WikiProject.

• Special report: Community mourns passing of Adrianne Wadewitz
  "I remember laughing and talking and laughing and talking at Wikimania 2012. I took this picture of her that she used for a long while as a profile pic. Someone on Facebook said it looked 'skepchickal', which she loved."

• Traffic report: Conquest of the Couch Potatoes
  Television has always been a topic of choice on this site, but it exploded this week. Fully six slots were devoted to television shows, as the final episode of How I Met Your Mother, one of the most popular Wikipedia searches of the last few years, coincided with the season finale of The Walking Dead and the upcoming fourth season of Game of Thrones. The number rises to 8 if movies released on video and new TV tech are are included.

• Featured content: Snow heater and Ash sweep
  Five article, five lists, and ten pictures were promoted to 'featured' status on the English Wikipedia last week.

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:07, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Reception history of Jane Austen scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that the Reception history of Jane Austen article has been scheduled to be rerun as today's featured article for January 21, 2019. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/January 21, 2019, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.

We also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors on the day before and the day of this TFA. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:34, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 January 2019

• Op-ed: Random Rewards Rejected
  Lab rats deflate research to be performed on the Wikipedia community.

• In focus: The Collective Consciousness of Admin Userpages
  Did you know that there was an admin who thought that the metaphor of the mop was a joke, and now they know it's not?

• News and notes: WMF staff turntable continues to spin; Endowment gets more cash; RfA continues to be a pit of steely knives
  Rude or just forgetful? Eight-year WMF manager has disappeared; Facebook gives a million bucks, gets no love.

• In the media: The Signpost's investigative story recognized, Wikipedia turns 18 and gets a birthday gift from Google, and more editors are recognized
  Heroes and unsung heroes: many good news stories about the work we are all doing together.

• Discussion report: The future of the reference desk
  Plus: plagiarism from Wikipedia, user categories, and admin activity requirements.

• Featured content: Don't miss your great opportunity
  Get yourself lost in 1730's Paris, and a wide range of other recently promoted content.

• Arbitration report: An admin under the microscope
  Snowman flames newbies? Or just oversensitive snowflakes?

• Traffic report: Death, royals and superheroes: Avengers, Black Panther
  The most popular articles of 2018 include a cornucopia of superheroes (Avengers: Infinity War)

• Technology report: When broken is easily fixed
  Emergency server switch goes smoothly; technical glitches resolved; a new way to transfer files to Commons.

• Gallery: Let us build a memorial fit for such pain and suffering
  A tour of some of the world's greatest memorials courtesy the Prime Minister of India.

• News from the WMF: News from WMF
  The world’s largest photo contest, a $1 million gift, Wikipedia’s birthday, WF appoints Valerie D'Costa.

• Recent research: Ad revenue from reused Wikipedia articles; are Wikipedia researchers asking the right questions?
  And other new research publications.

• Essay: How
  A narrative to get you oriented to how this place works, and to the key policies and guidelines.

• Humour: Village pump
  More talk pages you don't want to miss.

• From the archives: An editorial board that includes you
  Four years - and nothing changed?

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:50, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 February 2019

• From the editors: Help wanted (still)
  This may be too wordy, verbose and loquacious – and possibly redundant – but as you know, it takes others to check our work, and if there were more people in the Newsroom, we'd be able to double check ourselves and produce a better product for our readership; if you think you are up to it, you are welcome to join us and even copyedit the Editor-in-Chief's article intros.

• News and notes: Front-page issues for the community
  Encyclopedias for Deletion; Corinne; scholarships; partial blocks; and administrators headcount.

• In focus: Wikimedia affiliate organizations seek community participation in 2019 board election
  This election will select 2 of 10 seats on the board. All Wikimedia users are stakeholders in the election outcome and should participate.

• Discussion report: Talking about talk pages
  This month's major discussions include a WMF talk page consultation and a proposed current events noticeboard.

• Featured content: Conquest, War, Famine, Death, and more!
  Horsemen of the apocalypse all represented in recently promoted content, alongside new life, pretty birds, great music, and other miscellaneous topics.

• Arbitration report: A quiet month for Arbitration Committee
  Snowed in, maybe.

• Traffic report: Binge-watching
  Netflix shows and TV sports dominate. A US politician breaks into the top 10.

• Technology report: Tool labs casters-up
  Tool labs goes kaput, bots running wild (not really), interface administrators step into the breach, new gadgets and other tech happenings.

• Gallery: Signed with pride
  A gallery of user signatures created by Wikipedians themselves.

• Recent research: Research finds signs of cultural diversity and recreational habits of readers
  When watchers want the whole truth, they wind up with the wiki! And Cultural Context Content comes out of a complete cartography.

• Essay: Optimist's guide to Wikipedia
  Assume good faith even if it kills you.

• From the archives: New group aims to promote Wiki-Love
  The creation of the Esperanza group.

• Humour: Pesky Pronouns
  Not feeling blurbish right now.

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:16, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 March 2019

News, reports and features from the English Wikipedia's weekly journal about Wikipedia and Wikimedia

• From the editors: Getting serious about humor
• News and notes: Blackouts fail to stop EU Copyright Directive
• In the media: Women's history month
• Discussion report: Portal debates continue, Prespa agreement aftermath, WMF seeks a rebranding
• Featured content: Out of this world
• Arbitration report: The Tides of March at ARBCOM
• Traffic report: Exultations and tribulations
• Technology report: New section suggestions and sitewide styles
• News from the WMF: The WMF's take on the new EU Copyright Directive
• Recent research: Barnstar-like awards increase new editor retention
• From the archives: Esperanza organization disbanded after deletion discussion
• Humour: The Epistolary of Arthur 37
• Op-Ed: Pro and Con: Has gun violence been improperly excluded from gun articles?
• In focus: The Wikipedia SourceWatch
• Special report: Wiki Loves (50 Years of) Pride
• Community view: Wikipedia's response to the New Zealand mosque shootings

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · Global message delivery 15:41, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 April 2019

• News and notes: An Action Packed April
  New Administrators, April Fools, our competitors, and other associated updates

• In the media: Is Wikipedia just another social media site?
  Harassment, a black hole, the Mueller Report, and Mötley Crüe - just another social media site?

• Discussion report: English Wikipedia community's conclusions on talk pages
  Plus: another round of paid editing discussion.

• Featured content: Anguish, accolades, animals, and art
  April's admirable additions.

• Arbitration report: An Active Arbitration Committee
  Policies and procedures, cases and controversies, and other ArbCom updates

• Traffic report: Mötley Crüe, Notre-Dame, a black hole, and Bonnie and Clyde
  Round up the unusual suspects

• Technology report: A new special page, and other news
  Welcoming English Wikipedia's newest admin (bot)

• Gallery: Notre-Dame de Paris burns
  Photos and videos show the damage

• News from the WMF: Can machine learning uncover Wikipedia’s missing “citation needed” tags?
  Wikimedia Foundation data scientists are using machine learning to predict whether—and why—any given sentence on Wikipedia may need a citation in order to help editors identify areas of content violating the verifiability policy.

• Recent research: Female scholars underrepresented; whitepaper on Wikidata and libraries; undo patterns reveal editor hierarchy
  And other recent research results

• From the archives: Portals revisited
  "The future of portals", a year later

• Humour: Jimbo and Larry walk into a bar ...
  Some editors will do anything to get a laugh

• Opinion: The gaps in our knowledge of our gaps
  What we know we don't know, and why it might matter more than you might think

• Interview: Katherine Maher marks 3 years as executive director
  Maher discusses her tenure as ED, the editing community, harassment and diversity, the WMF's 3-5 year plan, airplane travel, books, and her future.

• Community view: 2019 Wikimedia Summit gathers movement affiliate representatives to discuss movement strategy
  An overview of Wikimedia Summit 2019, a working conference to discuss the Wikimedia 2030 Movement Strategy Process, preparing draft recommendations for Wikimania 2019 in August.

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:37, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 May 2019

• From the editors: Picture that
  The North Face sneaks in advertisements, apologizes after being caught

• News and notes: Wikimania and trustee elections
  Get ready to go to Wikimania in Stockholm where you might meet two new trustees

• In the media: Politics, lawsuits and baseball
  Wikipedia finds itself up against China, Pennsylvania politicians and the Detroit Tigers

• Discussion report: Admin abuse leads to mass-desysop proposal on Azerbaijani Wikipedia
  Neutrality and copyright concerns lead and part 2 of the talk pages consultation.

• Arbitration report: ArbCom forges ahead
  Resignations, new cases, administrator security, and more

• Traffic report: Dark marvels, thrones, a vile serial killer biopic, that's entertainment!
  Who will be next to fill the throne at the top of the list?

• Technology report: Lots of Bots
  Admin bots, approved bots, bots on trial, lots and lots of bots

• News from the WMF: Wikimedia Foundation petitions the European Court of Human Rights to lift the block of Wikipedia in Turkey
  The WMF keeps working to stop Turkey from blocking Wikipedia.

• Recent research: Wikipedia more useful than academic journals, but is it stealing the news?
  And other new research publications

• Essay: Paid editing
  We've been talking about paid editing forever

• From the archives: FORUM:Should Wikimedia modify its terms of use to require disclosure?
  A debate from 5 years ago on whether we use to prohibit undisclosed paid editing

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:12, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

The June 2019 Signpost is out!

• Discussion report: A constitutional crisis hits English Wikipedia
  Could this be a new relationship between the Foundation and ArbCom, and between the Foundation and enwiki?

• News and notes: Mysterious ban, admin resignations, Wikimedia Thailand rising
  Many administrators resign related to Fram case; Wikimedia Thailand to host Wikimania 2020.

• In the media: The disinformation age
  Or is it the information error?

• On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
  A selection of good news and encouraging stories that are from the Wikiverse.

• Traffic report: Juneteenth, Beauty Revealed, and more nuclear disasters
  Readers look for info on what they watch, mostly Chernobyl.

• Technology report: Actors and Bots
  Database changes, new scripts, Tech News, and more.

• Gallery: Unlike the North Face, Wiki Loves Earth
  Wikimedia photographers surge to contribute to the Wiki Loves Earth campaign even while rogue clothing company The North Face replaces wiki illustrations with advertisements.

• Special report: Did Fram harass other editors?
  (DELETED ARTICLE)

• Recent research: What do editors do after being blocked?; the top mathematicians, universities and cancers according to Wikipedia
  And other recent research publications.

• From the archives: Women and Wikipedia: the world is watching
  "If you don't clean up this mess, the adults are going to come and take your toys away from you."

• Opinion: Why the Terms of Use change didn't curtail undisclosed paid editing—and what might
  To reduce the incentives driving undisclosed paid editing, Wikipedia could simplify the process and meet outsiders halfway.

• In focus: WikiJournals: A sister project proposal
  Academic peer review meets Wikimedia.

• Community view: A CEO biography, paid for with taxes
  How an Irish state-level paid editor tried to turn me into the villain.

• Op-Ed: 2019 Wikimedia Affiliate Selected Board Seats Election Results
  Wikimedia community organizations elect two members for the Wikimedia Foundation board of trustees.

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:53, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 July 2019

• News and notes: Wikimedia grants less accessible for travel, equipment, meetups, and India
  WMF grants program changes position on funding random individuals globally and 100 crore people in one region

• In the media: Politics starts getting rough
  Are we ready for the sharp elbows?

• Discussion report: New proposals in aftermath of Fram ban
  Resysop requests on the ’crat board prove controversial; plus, aftermath of Framgate.

• Arbitration report: A month of reintegration
  Arbitration begins setting new boundaries after the June blow-up

• Gallery: Classic panoramas from Heinrich Berann
  It looks nice and cool up in those mountains

• On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
  A selection of good news and encouraging stories that are from the Wikiverse.

• Community view: Video based summaries of Wikipedia articles. How and why?
  It's easy, education saves lives.

• News from the WMF: Designing ethically with AI: How Wikimedia can harness machine learning in a responsible and human-centered way
  Or, how to avoid Artificial Ignorance

• Recent research: Most influential medical journals; detecting pages to protect
  And other new research publications

• Special report: Administrator cadre continues to contract
  A new record set: fewer than 500 active admins.

• Traffic report: World cups, presidential candidates, and stranger things
  and don't forget the movies

• In focus: The French Wikipedia is overtaking the German
  Who is growing? Who is not?

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 August 2019

• News and notes: Documenting Wikimania and our beginnings
  The oldest surviving Wikipedia edit restored to article history, Wikimania, and the mystery of a disappearing Funds Dissemination Committee.

• In focus: Ryan Merkley joins WMF as Chief of Staff
  Working with leadership and the community, taking on both operational and strategic responsibilities

• In the media: Many layers of fake news: Fake fiction and fake news vandalism
  And the media report it all

• Discussion report: Meta proposals on partial bans and IP users
  Can we survive without IP addresses?

• Traffic report: Once upon a time in Greenland with Boris and cornflakes
  And some summer flicks with the usual heroes and villains

• Op-Ed: We couldn't have told you this, but Wikipedia was censored
  Should we break the law or publish the truth?

• Opinion: The Curious Case of Croatian Wikipedia
  Or how to make a concentration camp disappear?

• Community view: Chinese Wikipedia and the battle against extradition from Hong Kong
  From streets to Wikipedia - What are editors from Hong Kong facing?

• News from the WMF: Meet Emna Mizouni, the newly minted 2019 Wikimedian of the Year
  Emna Mizouni was named the 2019 Wikimedian of the Year.

• Recent research: Special issue on gender gap and gender bias research
  A roundup of many recent publications examining Wikpedia's gender gaps in participation and content, and their possible reasons

• On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
  A selection of good news and encouraging stories that are from the Wikiverse

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:42, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 September 2019

• From the editors: Where do we go from here?
  Our constitutional crisis may continue

• Special report: Post-Framgate wrapup
  Summary of actions around a formerly banned former administrator: Arbitration Committee action and withdrawn request for adminship

• In the media: A net loss: Wikipedia attacked, closing off Russia? welcoming back Turkey?
  The internet may not be as stable as it seems

• Traffic report: Varied and intriguing entries, less Luck, and some retreads
  Luck, Serena, Bianca, 9/11, bad films, mass murderers and other good stuff

• News from the WMF: How the Wikimedia Foundation is making efforts to go green
  Wikipedia's footprint is equivalent to 251 average US homes’ energy use. Yes we can go green.

• Recent research: Wikipedia's role in assessing credibility of news sources; using wikis against procrastination; OpenSym 2019 report
  And other recent research publications

• Gallery: Finding freely licensed photo collections
  Wikimedia Commons is not the only place to find freely licensed photos

• On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
  A selection of good news and encouraging stories that are from the Wikiverse

• In focus: Wikidata & Wikibase for national libraries: the inaugural meeting
  National libraries are planning to leverage Wikidata to interoperate and to bring information to the public

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:07, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 October 2019

• In the media: How to use or abuse Wikipedia for fun or profit
  Sweden, Poland, Armenia, Russia, the Vatican, and clueless English pubs.

• Special report: “Catch and Kill” on Wikipedia: Paid editing and the suppression of material on alleged sexual abuse
  "It's time for Wikipedia to grow up."

• In focus: The BBC looks at Chinese government editing
  But they aren't entirely sure they see it

• Interview: Carl Miller on Wikipedia Wars
  A discussion on info wars, government editing and our defences.

• Community view: Observations from the mainland
  A different point of view

• Arbitration report: October actions
  An "unblockable" is blocked; a former arb resigns.

• Traffic report: Wrestling with a couple of teenagers, a Nobelist, and a lot of jokers
  Plus a few celebrities.

• Gallery: Wiki Loves Broadcast
  The future of public broadcasting has arrived.

• Recent research: Research at Wikimania 2019: More communication doesn't make editors more productive; Tor users doing good work; harmful content rare on English Wikipedia
  And other new research publications

• Essay: Wikipedia is in the real world
  Editing can have serious consequences.

• News from the WMF: Welcome to Wikipedia! Here's what we're doing to help you stick around
  Twenty questions to get you started.

• On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
  A selection of good news and encouraging stories from the Wikiverse.

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:12, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 November 2019

• From the editor: Put on your birthday best
  "We get by with a little help from our friends"

• News and notes: How soon for the next million articles?
  And when will we get the second extraterrestrial edit?

• In the media: You say you want a revolution
  Everybody wants to change Wikipedia.

• On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
  A selection of good news and encouraging stories from the Wikiverse.

• Arbitration report: Two requests for arbitration cases
  Important or imprudent? Pondering portals. And an editor gets transported off-wiki for good.

• Traffic report: The queen and the princess meet the king and the joker
  Could this be the end of the Terminator?

• Technology report: Reference things, sister things, stranger things
  The latest tech news and updates.

• Gallery: Winter and holidays
  Some interesting and unusual winter and holiday images.

• Recent research: Bot census; discussions differ on Spanish and English Wikipedia; how nature's seasons affect pageviews
  And other new research publications.

• Essay: Adminitis
  Some humor about the otherwise serious subject of burnout.

• From the archives: WikiProject Spam, revisited
  Veteran editor: Wikipedia is losing existential battle against spam.

• In focus: An update on the Wikimedia Movement 2030 Strategy
  Coming to the end of a long road formulating the strategy.

• Special report: How many people edit in your favorite language? Where are they from?
  Only now can we say!

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:24, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 December 2019

• From the editors: Caught with their hands in the cookie jar, again
  You can buy "cleaners" but you might not come away clean.

• News and notes: What's up (and down) with administrators, articles and languages
  Active administrators and articles achieved are marking milestone metrics, but in diverging directions. Plus, the first time any court has found there exists a constitutional right to read Wikipedia.

• Special report: Are reputation management operatives scrubbing Wikipedia articles?
  Son of Wiki-PR.

• In the media: "The fulfillment of the dream of humanity" or a nightmare of PR whitewashing on behalf of one-percenters?
  Praise for possibly pansophic Wikipedia from a Nobel laureate collides head-on with real-world events in December.

• Discussion report: December discussions around the wiki
  Regarding integrity of information presented by Wikipedia, as well as the processes and people who ensure it remains trustworthy.

• Arbitration report: Announcement of 2020 Arbitration Committee
  ArbCom election results and status of open and requested cases.

• Traffic report: Queens and aliens, exactly alike, once upon a December
  We may have scrambled the headlines a bit.

• Technology report: User scripts and more
  Customise your Wikipedia experience

• Gallery: Holiday wishes
  Messages of holiday cheer from us to you.

• Recent research: Acoustics and Wikipedia; Wiki Workshop 2019 summary
  16 recent papers, and other research news

• From the archives: The 2002 Spanish fork and ads revisited (re-revisited?)
  A look at different approaches taken by Wikipedia's founders in 2002, as seen from the perspective of nine years when it was written; nearly twenty years ago now.

• On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
  A selection of good news and encouraging stories from the Wikiverse.

• Op-Ed: Why we need to keep talking about Wikipedia's gender gap
  There's still a long way to go.

• WikiProject report: Wikiproject Tree of Life: A Wikiproject report
  Eight years after our last interview, WikiProject Tree of Life continues to thrive.

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:38, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 January 2020

• From the editor: Reaching six million articles is great, but we need a moratorium
  How long can we ignore Wiki-PR?

• News and notes: Six million articles on the English language Wikipedia
  You ain't seen nothing yet.

• Special report: The limits of volunteerism and the gatekeepers of Team Encarta
  How to survive the asshole consensus.

• In the media: Turkey's back up, but what's happening with Dot-org and a new visual identity?
  Plus politics and other oddities.

• Arbitration report: Three cases at ArbCom
  The new arbs have a big load.

• Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2019
  As only The Signpost can describe them.

• Gallery: Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, we're all winners
  The top 15 international photos.

• News from the WMF: Capacity Building: Top 5 Themes from Community Conversations
  Growing our community and our abilities.

• Community view: Our most important new article since November 1, 2015
  Well, it's a bit subjective.

• In focus: Cryptos and bitcoins and blockchains, oh no!
  Everybody needs to make a buck somehow — just not here, thanks.

• Recent research: How useful is Wikipedia for novice programmers trying to learn computing concepts?
  And other new research publications.

• From the archives: A decade of The Signpost, 2005-2015
  The first 10 years are the hardest.

• On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
  A selection of good news and encouraging stories from the Wikiverse.

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Japan: a wikiProject Report
  An interview with four members of the WikiProject Japan.

• Humour: Predicting the 6,000,000th article
  I may fall in love all over again!

• Obituary: Remembering Wikipedia contributor Brian Boulton
  A mentor to us all

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 March 2020

• From the editor: The ball is in your court
  How to stop abusive commercial editing.

• News and notes: Alexa ranking down to 13th worldwide
  Falling behind Chinese websites.

• Special report: More participation, more conversation, more pageviews
  A statistical insight into the English Wikipedia's very own online community newsletter.

• In the media: Mapping IP editors, Smithsonian open-access, and coronavirus disinformation
  We're all over the map this month.

• Discussion report: Do you prefer M or P?
  Wikimedia or Wikipedia?

• Arbitration report: Two prominent administrators removed
  Arbitration Committee and the "blue wall of silence".

• By the numbers: How many actions by administrators does it take to clean up spam?
  Numbers for vandalism and sockpuppeting included at no additional charge!

• Community view: The Incredible Invisible Woman
  No more "Hidden Figures", let's work to make women visible on Wikipedia!

• In focus: History of The Signpost, 2015–2019
  Covering Wikipedia for another five years!

• Recent research: Wikipedia generates $50 billion/year consumer surplus in the US alone
  And other new research results

• From the archives: Is Wikipedia for sale?
  How long has Wikipedia been for sale? When will it stop?

• Traffic report: February articles, floating in the dark
  Kobe sets another record.

• Gallery: Feel the love
  Renewing our vows.

• On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
  A selection of good news and encouraging stories from the Wikiverse.

• Op-Ed: What I learned as Wikimedia UK Communications Coordinator
  Getting across the Wikipedia experience to the press.

• Opinion: Wikipedia is another country
  Or: how to best bite a newbie.

• Humour: The Wilhelm scream
  WikiWorld is back.

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:46, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 March 2020

• From the editors: The bad and the good
  Getting ready for anything.

• News and notes: 2018 Wikipedian of the year blocked
  Wheel war on Tatar Wikipedia.

• WikiProject report: WikiProject COVID-19: A WikiProject Report
  An interview with members of the COVID Project.

• Special report: Wikipedia on COVID-19: what we publish and why it matters
  Wikipedia presents solid widely-consulted information on COVID-19 and related topics.

• In the media: Blocked in Iran but still covering the big story
  COVID-19, Zika, edit-a-thons, and macrons.

• Discussion report: Rethinking draft space
  Plus: geonotices, reliable sources, and job titles.

• Arbitration report: Unfinished business
  A new case, a case returns from limbo, and an RfC being prepared.

• In focus: "I have been asked by Jeffrey Epstein …"
  The twists and turns of Epstein’s portrayal on Wikipedia.

• Community view: Wikimedia community responds to COVID-19
  Individually and in organized groups, Wikimedians stand up and make a difference.

• Recent research: Disease outbreak uncertainties, AfD forecasting, auto-updating Wikipedia
  New research publications on "the fear of being erased" and other topics.

• From the archives: Text from Wikipedia good enough for Oxford University Press to claim as own
  Five years ago with a different crisis.

• Traffic report: The only thing that matters in the world
  Going to movies and sport stadiums is history, and readers turn to Wikipedia for crucial medical information and updates.

• Gallery: Visible Women on Wikipedia
  Images from the Whose Knowlege? campaign.

• News from the WMF: Amid COVID-19, Wikimedia Foundation offers full pay for reduced hours, mobilizes all staff to work remote, and waives sick time
  The WMF responds.

• On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
  A selection of good news and encouraging stories from the Wikiverse.

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:43, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 April 2020

• News and notes: Unbiased information from Ukraine's government?
  The Ministry of Foreign Affairs pitches in.

• In the media: Coronavirus, again and again
  Plus the importance of language.

• Discussion report: Redesigning Wikipedia, bit by bit
  The Wikimedia community discusses modifying or hiding the sidebar on the left of every page.

• Featured content: Featured content returns
  Movies, roads, awards and more.

• Arbitration report: Two difficult cases
  Even our best editors sometimes disagree.

• Traffic report: Disease the Rhythm of the Night
  Coronavirus, coronavirus, and Joe Exotic.

• Gallery: Roy is doing fine and sending more photos
  A coronavirus cruise can't stop Roy!

• Recent research: Trending topics across languages; auto-detecting bias
  And other new research results.

• Essay: Wikipedia:An article about yourself isn't necessarily a good thing
  And it could get worse!

• By the numbers: Open data and COVID-19: Wikipedia as an informational resource during the pandemic
  What COVID-19 data are available from the WMF?

• Opinion: Trusting Everybody to Work Together
  In an increasingly factious world, Wikipedia's approach to collaboration and trust-building point to a brighter future.

• On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
  A selection of good news and encouraging stories from the Wikiverse.

• Interview: Health and RfA's: An interview with Guy Macon
  A Wikipedia editor reflects on his recent RfA and the health issues that became part of it.

• In focus: Multilingual Wikipedia
  How to better integrate articles across language editions.

• WikiProject report: The Guild of Copy Editors
  An interview with members of the WP:GOCE

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:18, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 May 2020

• From the editor: Meltdown May?
  Or will it be meltdown June?

• News and notes: 2019 Picture of the Year, 200 French paid editing accounts blocked, 10 years of Guild Copyediting
  Many of these accounts now blocked on the English-language Wikipedia.

• In the media: CBS on COVID-19, Sanger on bias, false noses, and five prolific editors
  Worth Every Goddamn Second!

• Discussion report: WMF's Universal Code of Conduct
  It's no April Fool's joke, but we discuss those, too.

• Special report: The sum of human knowledge? Not in one Wikipedia language edition
  Cultural context, diversity, and the future of languages.

• Featured content: Weathering the storm
  Battles, bombs, wars, and more storms.

• Arbitration report: Board member likely to receive editing restriction
  Sanctions of multiple flavors, and a non-decision on the breadth of discretionary sanctions.

• Traffic report: Come on and slam, and welcome to the jam
  Time to bring on the Bulls.

• Op-Ed: Where Is Political Bias Taking Us?
  Straight down the tubes.

• Gallery: Wildlife photos by the book
  Birds, insects, elephants, a macaque and more.

• News from the WMF: WMF Board announces Community Culture Statement
  Enacting new standards to address harassment and promote inclusivity across projects.

• Recent research: Automatic detection of covert paid editing; Wiki Workshop 2020
  New results from academic research

• Community view: Transit routes and mapping during stay-at-home order downtime
  Hello Columbus.

• On video: COVID-19 spurs innovations in Wikimedia video and virtual programming
  Community harnesses new technologies for remote participation in events and gatherings

• WikiProject report: Revitalizing good articles
  Can our energy be turned into long-term change?

• On the bright side: 500,000 articles in the Egyptian Arabic Wikipedia
  A selection of good news and encouraging stories from the Wikiverse.

• Obituaries: Dmitrismirnov, Kattenkruid, Muidlatif, Ronhjones, Tsirel
  Rest in peace.

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:06, 31 May 2020 (UTC)