Latest comment: 5 days ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Draft declinedThank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
FeedbackThe reviewer, Meadowlark, left the following feedback:
provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
This draft does not show that your subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. Please see WP:42 for more information on what kind of sources you need. At least three suitable sources are generally required; a suitable source meets all three criteria in WP:42. In particular, interviews with or sources written by the subject (or their friends, family, colleagues, etc) are not considered independent.
As this is a biography of a living person, all statements must be cited to a reliable source. Please either find suitable references for, or remove, any currently unsourced statements. For example, Angdembe is known for his highly technical grappling and explosive finishing ability absolutely must have a source - who has said that's what he's known for? Is it someone experienced in the sport, whose opinion we can trust?
All but one of your current sources are pages of statistics - you need sources that discuss Angdembe in some depth, written by people who don't know him but think he's interesting enough to write about.
Next steps
Edit Draft:Yuki Angdembe to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
To understand why your draft was declined, please read the reviewer's feedback and follow any links to help pages you've been given. If you're still confused, try asking for advice at the Articles for creation Help desk.
For peer support regarding all other editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a friendly question and answer hub for new editors. We'd love to see you there! Meadowlark (talk) 00:39, 9 August 2026 (UTC)Reply