Jump to content

User talk:Programmer628

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 2 months ago by Dog Oxide in topic "Divers" article sandbox

Welcome!

[edit]

Hi Programmer628! I noticed your contributions to Echo suppression and cancellation and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, try the "Suggested edits" module top left on your homepage, or you can always find a task here:

Search the Task Center

Happy editing! ~Kvng (talk) 14:37, 6 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Florence Welch

[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Florence Welch, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:46, 13 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, I've fixed the date formatting issues! Programmer628 (talk) 20:11, 13 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

"Divers" article sandbox

[edit]

Hey, I just wanted to say your draft of the "Divers" article is looking really good so far! If you're welcome to it, I'd love to collaborate on it and contribute citations and information to the draft. I wrote the gender marker article and I did some research on "divers" and other available legal sex options, so I may be able to help speed up the process of sourcing and publishing the article.

Cheers, DoO2 23:14, 1 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

That'd be incredibly helpful! In particular a lot of the legal citations/details are things I'm less familiar with so would love help. Are you able to edit in the sandbox article I'm making? Or do we need to move it somewhere else (I haven't created a new article before, only edited existing ones) Programmer628 (talk) 23:17, 1 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
I can absolutely edit the sandbox and help contribute those. For future reference, basically anyone can edit pages in another user's "userspace" like sandboxes, templates, even the user page itself. Usually though, that sort of thing isn't done because these spaces are treated as inconsequential enough to the core of Wikipedia to not warrant policing or editing. This means that sandboxes are actually a great place to collaborate on articles, as they are completely free to mold and edit by anyone as you prepare an article for mainspace. I'm currently traveling for the next two weeks but will likely get in some editing here and there, so I'll especially focus on citations since that's the biggest area left to complete. DoO2 01:26, 2 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hello to you both! This sandbox article looks more well-developed than the current draft I'd found, and I'd be interested in helping as well. (Can there be more than one draft of the same name?)
Rayisahuman ~ 09:11, 8 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
I think if there are multiple drafts of the same name, it's best to consolidate them into one. This is because when a new article is being created, the user may be notified if there is an existing draft. As such, I think this user's draft should be the place where all information is consolidated. However, if you want to maintain your own draft to complete some information, you could also make it a sandbox I suppose. DoO2 10:48, 8 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Yes we should merge, sorry this is my first time attempting to translate a substantial article. What would be the best way to do that (and to make it so there isn't more duplicative work?) Programmer628 (talk) 15:59, 8 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
No worries, there's a first time for everything! Since your draft is the more developed one, I believe the information will mostly be moved from the existing draft Rayisaham identified. With these things it's better to just do what works instead of worrying too much about what might be the "right" process, and I'm this case we'll just take from the smaller draft and incorporate it into the bigger draft. As for avoiding duplicate information, it's just as plain as checking the existing draft for information not mentioned in yours and finding where it could be best incorporated. DoO2 17:03, 8 June 2026 (UTC)Reply