User talk:Muplan

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Mystus vittatus, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless that text is available under a suitable free license. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed.

For other edits, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, try the "Suggested edits" module top left on your homepage, or you can always find a task here:

Search the Task Center

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:10, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Main Page interwikis

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Template:Main Page interwikis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2025_July_5#Template:Main_Page_interwikis. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Gonnym (talk) 06:14, 26 May 2026 (UTC)

Yin Yin Benzula moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Yin Yin Benzula. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:27, 20 June 2026 (UTC)

July 2026

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2026 July 10. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 05:05, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:EUvin may be offensive or unwelcome. In general, it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' user pages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to Wikipedia:User page for more information on user page etiquette. You were already warned here to stop editing other people's user pages. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:09, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create an inappropriate page, as you did at Cartoon Prototypes Wiki(Fandom). Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:59, 17 July 2026 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at User:Meters too. Stop messing around with other users' user pages. And on User:Renamed user awfwvowjvwrvnwio and User:ChiefsFan750 Meters (talk) 04:32, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:Anomie. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:13, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

Reddit, fandom, and Discord posts are not reliable sources and have no bearing on notability

Hello, I'm Ohnoitsjamie. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that in one of your recent contributions you cited a link to a source that may not be reliable. Sources considered unreliable should generally not be used to support statements. Information from an unreliable source can be challenged by other editors and removed. Reliable sources are generally those with a reputation for fact-checking and editorial oversight. Self-published material, user-generated content, and certain other outlets such as blogs, wikis, personal websites, and websites or publications with a poor reputation for fact-checking may not meet these standards. If you are unsure about which sources are appropriate, there is a list of sources that are considered generally reliable. Additionally, some WikiProjects have their own lists of sources that are considered reliable for that particular subtopic. If you are still unsure about a source's reliability, you can ask at the reliable sources noticeboard. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^talk 13:09, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for the contributional deletion. I have a drafted article and have erased it Mulpan (talk) 13:40, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

Your draft has zero reliable sources. User-generated content sites do not meet WP:RS, ever. There is zero chance of that draft being accepted unless you can provide third party reliable sources to establish notability. OhNoitsJamie ^talk 15:38, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Italian Brainrot Wiki

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Italian Brainrot Wiki, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Frost 13:42, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Italian Brainrot Wiki (July 10)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, My Pants Metal, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for web content. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the subject, such as the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources.

• Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.
• Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute.

Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Italian Brainrot Wiki to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

My Pants Metal (talk) 14:33, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Muplan! Having a draft declined at Articles for creation can be disappointing, but don't be discouraged, it's common when creating your first article. Need help? For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know. To understand why your draft was declined, please read the reviewer's feedback and follow any links to help pages you've been given. If you're still confused, try asking for advice at the Articles for creation Help desk. For peer support regarding all other editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a friendly question and answer hub for new editors. We'd love to see you there! My Pants Metal (talk) 14:33, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Michigun(Geometry Dash player)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Michigun(Geometry Dash player), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
  If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Axolitl (talk | contribs) 04:45, 13 July 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Geometry Dash

A tag has been placed on Category:Geometry Dash indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:09, 13 July 2026 (UTC)

Editing other's userpages

Hello, Please do NOT change or edit other's userpages as you did on User:Gourami Watcher. They removed their content, replaced it with {{retired}}, and left in 2022 as they have every right to do. You substantially changed it/restored it, violating their presumed wishes, and conflicting with the general Wikipedia etiquette of editing other's content stated at WP:TPO (while TPO focuses on other's talk pages/comments, the same ideas apply towards other's userpages also). While specific corrective editing may be done in other's userspace for tracked issues, the general rule of thumb is don't edit other's userpages without their permission or a very good reason.

Thank you, Zinnober9 (talk) 11:20, 13 July 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Italian Brainrot Wiki for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Italian Brainrot Wiki is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Italian Brainrot Wiki until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

AdobongPogi^{masarap 🍛} 11:42, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

Adding your own commentary to articles

Per WP:NOR, do not add your own commentary to articles as you did here. If you want to participate in the AfD, you are welcome to do so, but I suggest you read WP:DISCUSSAFD first. OhNoitsJamie ^talk 13:12, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

Draft:Italian Brainrot Wiki

I have deleted this draft as a duplicate of the page that you already recreated in mainspace. Do not recreate the draft or the article after the AfD concludes; if you do, they will be deleted again and you will be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^talk 02:19, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of FantastiCube

The article FantastiCube has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Copied and pasted from https://italianbrainrot.wikioasis.org/wiki/User:FantastiCube - lacks any notability outside of Italian Brainrot Wiki, which is also soon to be deleted.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:59, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:UserInfobox

A tag has been placed on Template:UserInfobox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Test page, and creator intentionally blanked

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. My Pants Metal (talk) 11:27, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

Creating inappropriate pages, editing other user's pages

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^talk 11:42, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Italian Brainrot Wiki

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Italian Brainrot Wiki requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:17, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Italian Brainrot Wiki

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Italian Brainrot Wiki requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.

Boynamedsue (talk) 06:01, 17 July 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cartoon Prototypes Wiki(Fandom)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Cartoon Prototypes Wiki(Fandom) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Zzz plant (talk) 06:35, 17 July 2026 (UTC)

Final, final warning

Hi, you were issued with a final warning by User:Ohnoitsjamie yesterday but subsequently created 2 further inappropriate and non-notable articles, Italian Brainrot Wiki and Cartoon Prototypes Wiki(Fandom). Please take this as your final, final warning regarding creating inappropriate articles. If you need to practise editing, use User:Muplan/sandbox. If you carry on making inappropriate articles, you will be reported to WP:ANI, where editing restrictions may be imposed. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:54, 17 July 2026 (UTC)

Blocked 72 hours, next block will be indefinite

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request through the unblock wizard or through your talk page.

OhNoitsJamie ^talk 10:20, 17 July 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Scrombley?

A tag has been placed on Scrombley? requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. My Pants Metal (talk) 16:40, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

Your userbox page

Hi Muplan, I have unfortunately had to suppress some of your edits because they reveal too much personally identifiable information about you. We have a policy of protecting editors' safety by hiding such information if they share it. I'm really sorry about having to suppress your edits, and I know it's annoying, but it's for the best. Please don't re-add the information. For some useful information on privacy and safety, you can take a look at Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors and Wikipedia:On privacy, confidentiality and discretion. Thanks, and sorry for messing about with your pages! ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 08:17, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

You can award me here Mulpan (talk) 08:24, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

July 2026

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your recent edits appear to be disruptive. Please note that this is not necessarily an assessment of faith or character, and we welcome good faith edits that are also constructive and in line with our policies.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request through the unblock wizard or through your talk page.  ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 10:51, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Muplan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I shouldn't have been blocked indefinitely because I didn't edit too bad and some are good resources. I didn't want to make some bad edits but i want many good edits as I can. Mulpan (talk) 11:32, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you:
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 12:21, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

May need to be unblocked

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Muplan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

Because I didn't want to edit disruptively or too badly, I just want to make more useful cotributions,apologiesMulpan (talk) 3:34 pm, Yesterday (UTC+3)

Decline reason:

Nothing new since the previous unblock request. In the nicest way possible, I believe it would be best if you came back in a couple of years. DatGuy^Talk_Contribs 18:59, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You need to provide a reason or this will be declined. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:29, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

WE OR YOU CAN UNBLOCK IT OR ELSE...

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Muplan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I accept that my past edits were disruptive because [explain exactly what you did, e.g., I repeatedly changed information without providing reliable sources]. I now understand that this violates Wikipedia's core policies. If unblocked, I promise to [explain your new plan, e.g., discuss major changes on article talk pages first and always cite high-quality references]. I would like the opportunity to contribute productively.

Decline reason:

If you don't leave the [comments] in there, it's not quite so obviously from a chatbot or similar.

You are blocked, not your chatbot friend, therefore you need to tell us why you think you should be unblocked. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:18, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Mulpan (talk) 06:12, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Dear, all Wikipedians. We're currently expieriencing the block on Wikipedia. Can we support us? Else I retire becoming Wikipedian.Mulpan (talk) 01:39, 15 August 2026 (UTC)

No, we're not going to help you get unblocked. You are experiencing a block because you are blocked for good reason. The reasons for your block have already been explained, and what you need to do to have a hope of getting unblocked has already been explained to you. The fact that you don't seem to understand what we have already told you suggests that this is a WP:CIR issue. Meters (talk) 10:38, 15 August 2026 (UTC)