User talk:MilHistBot
Add topicLatest comment: 1 month ago by Hawkeye7 in topic Visual bug from auto-rating
 | Hi, I'm a bot, so I cannot respond to your questions. However, if you leave a note here, or on the talk page of my owner Hawkeye7, I'm sure he will be able to help you. |
I changed the checklist and the bot overrode me. Why? Srnec (talk) 20:31, 1 May 2026 (UTC)
- The class was set to empty, which instructs the bot to check it. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:14, 1 May 2026 (UTC)
- Why does the bot think it knows better the coverage and accuracy of the article than a human reviewer? Srnec (talk) 22:39, 1 May 2026 (UTC)
- The human asked the bot to re-check the article, so it was assumed to have changed. Coverage and accuracy are indeed the most difficult criteria for the bot to assess. I would have given it a B myself, but am deferring to your better knowledge of the subject. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:33, 2 May 2026 (UTC)
- Why does the bot think it knows better the coverage and accuracy of the article than a human reviewer? Srnec (talk) 22:39, 1 May 2026 (UTC)
FYI the {{bannershell}} template redirect was not processed correctly here yesterday. ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 11:46, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
Visual bug from auto-rating
[edit]When an article is rated, MilHistBot is creating two talk page headers, one with the old rating and one with the new. An example of this can be seen at Talk:John D. Templeton. This needs fixing. Roast (talk) 21:27, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- Will investigate. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 23:01, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- My apologies. It looks like I had already fixed this problem, but had not upgraded the run to the latest version of the library. This has now been done. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 01:52, 14 July 2026 (UTC)