User talk:Impru20
Add topic| This is Impru20's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 |
Ref issues at 1979 Barcelona municipal election
[edit]There are presently 8 Harv errors in this article - Refs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, & 8. Please fix these 8 citing errors so the article will no longer be in Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors. - Shearonink (talk) 05:52, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Acting presidency in Venezuela
[edit]Hi
Is it a strategy to avoid organizing new elections? Panam2014 (talk) 15:52, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Notice
[edit]
You have recently made edits related to the results of any national or sub-national election. This is a standard message to inform you that the results of any national or sub-national election is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:51, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Your nomination of 2023 Spanish government formation is under review
[edit]Your good article nomination of the article 2023 Spanish government formation is
under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Reconrabbit -- Reconrabbit (talk) 22:22, 21 January 2026 (UTC)
January 2026
[edit]
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Second W. Misick ministry when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance.
Thank you. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 05:47, 23 January 2026 (UTC)
Your nomination of 2023 Spanish government formation is on hold
[edit]Your good article nomination of the article 2023 Spanish government formation has been placed
on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Reconrabbit -- Reconrabbit (talk) 22:06, 23 January 2026 (UTC)
CS1 error on 2016 Spanish general election
[edit]
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2016 Spanish general election, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:03, 24 January 2026 (UTC)
CS1 error on April 2019 Spanish general election
[edit]
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page April 2019 Spanish general election, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:04, 24 January 2026 (UTC)
Your nomination of 2023 Spanish government formation has passed
[edit]Your good article nomination of the article 2023 Spanish government formation has
passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Reconrabbit -- Reconrabbit (talk) 17:07, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
CS1 error on Opinion polling for the next Spanish general election
[edit]
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Opinion polling for the next Spanish general election, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:52, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
Notice of neutral point of view noticeboard discussion
[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- Tobby72 (talk) 12:11, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
Opinion polling for the next United Kingdom general election
[edit]You ask why the Ashcroft poll was deleted. He always does it. Jakefolds2 is the user whose edit warring back in December was responsible for getting this article protected for a year. Yet he was back after a few days and has repeatedly deleted Ashcroft polls, which he regards as unreliable and biased. Meanwhile, I and others like me are locked out for the rest of the year. This is making a mockery of Wikipedia protection policy, which is not fit for purpose. See Talk:Opinion polling for the next United Kingdom general election#Deletion of Lord Ashcroft Poll and User talk:Jakefolds2. ~2026-13144-75 (talk) 21:08, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
CS1 error on 1987 Castilian-Leonese regional election
[edit]
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 1987 Castilian-Leonese regional election, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:05, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
Government easter egg
[edit]Regarding this change, please raise your concerns about the consensus to undo "Government" easter egg at Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/Linking#Easteregg:_link_to_specific_cabinet_behind_"Government". - Butwhatdoiknow (talk) 00:25, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
- I have raised your concerns there. - Butwhatdoiknow (talk) 01:11, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- And I have apologized there as well. - Butwhatdoiknow (talk) 17:39, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 15
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2023 Spanish general election, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Liberal was added.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 22:39, 15 March 2026 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 27
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited November 2019 Spanish general election, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ministry of Equality was added.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 21:38, 27 March 2026 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 10
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1979 Spanish local elections, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Island council was added.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:03, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 17
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1987 Spanish local elections, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orense was added.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:17, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
This new user has been active on the infoboxes of left wing parties. I reverted the edit to Sumar, because it had no source and the consensus should be on left, with explanations of sources mentioning far or centre left.
However, I am less sure about the edits to the PCE and IU. They have removed references saying far left, and replaced it with one source (academic, yes) saying just left. I don't know enough about the subject or the sources, but it seems a particularly bold first edit, and maybe a compromise should be taken that gives due weight to all sources. The argument that parties that take part in elections are not "far" in their beliefs has also been bludgeoned by supporters of Vox, AfD, Front National for years now. Unknown Temptation (talk) 11:38, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
May 2026
[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Qwerty123M (talk) 13:33, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
One-use templates: Spanish election polling
[edit]Good evening,
I was considering substituting some templates you've created like the following:
{{Alternative scenario opinion polling for the April 2019 Spanish general election}}{{Opinion polling for the April 2019 Spanish general election (Graphical summary)}}(used on 2 pages){{Party opinion polling for the April 2019 Spanish general election}}
Same goes for other similar ones.
My basic reason is one-use templates are unnecessary. In general, the fewer templates, the easier a page (and the wiki overall) is to maintain. With page-specific templates, it's harder to keep the page contents correct, because they rely on two pages. If a citation breaks on the template, it's less noticeable and requires understanding two pages to fix.
I fixed this citation issue, for example. --Retro (talk | contribs) 20:20, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
- Retro Thank you for the notice. Ok, let me check, these templates were created many years ago and I think some of the reasons that justified them no longer applied. I will be merging some of their content back into the main articles wherever possible so that this is done in an orderly way. Impru20talk 08:03, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
Category:Mayor-Presidents of the autonomous cities of Spain has been nominated for merging
[edit]Category:Mayor-Presidents of the autonomous cities of Spain has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:35, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
Opinion polling for the 2026 Peruvian general election
[edit]Hi
for Opinion polling for the 2026 Peruvian general election and 2026 Colombian presidential election, both potential run-offers should be colored. Panam2014 (talk) 01:50, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
Opinion polling for the next Spanish general election
There are two surveys that are not reflected in the survey chart: the CIS (Target Point) and the CIS (Ateneo del Dato). Mentoss740 (talk) 19:13, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
Elections notabilty.
[edit]I've completely reworded my question on election notability, and changed it from a potential RfC to just a regular old discussion. However, your comments are still relevant, so I've left them in there, unchanged. Thanks for taking the time to join in! Commandant Quacks-a-lot (talk) 12:32, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
Re AN/I filing: Disruptive behaviour by Howard the Duck involving AFD
[edit]Hi @Impru20 - I've closed your filing at AN/I with no action and the following comment: "Howard the Duck has acknowledged and is held to understand proper use of PROD; Impru is requested to consider that a challenge to "up the ante" does not necessarily require a response that ups the ante." Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 10:28, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
Aspersion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2025 Iloilo City local elections
[edit]@Impru20 - your nomination statement included this: "Further, the article was created while a discussion on a similar topic was taking place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2028 Iloilo City local elections (which has since resulted in Deletion, for GNG and SIGCOV reasons)." It might well be a factual statement, but it has no relevance to the question of the notability of the 2025 Iloilo City local elections article and imputes negatively (casts an aspersion) on the intentions of the creator of the article. In your AN/I filing a number of contributors noted the tone of your responses; I'd encourage you to reflect on that (as with my closing comment) and remember less can quite often be more. Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 01:17, 9 June 2026 (UTC)
- @Goldsztajn: Accusing someone of casting aspersions and of raising the temperature in an ongoing discussion is unnecessarily inflamating. I see that, far from just dropping it after my polite remark that I did not like such appreciation, you chose to double down on your statements, which seems weird if your intention is really to avoid "raising the temperature": so far, it is you the only one who have gone personal over this issue, and you the one who keeps "raising the temperature" in the discussion, so I am kindly asking you (for a second time) to stop. The AfD comes directly as a result of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2028 Iloilo City local elections, so yes, that is why I mentioned it. And yes, I felt that was necessary precisely because there is a direct connection. I did not mention anything else other than content and Delete arguments (GNG and SIGCOV), nor any other user, yet you have somehow assumed this is an aspersion for some reason. Please, assume good faith. Thank you and regards. Impru20talk 07:12, 9 June 2026 (UTC)
Nomination of Next Andalusian regional election for deletion
[edit]The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Next Andalusian regional election until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.Nomination of Next Aragonese regional election for deletion
[edit]The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Next Aragonese regional election until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.Nomination of Next Castilian-Leonese regional election for deletion
[edit]The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Next Castilian-Leonese regional election until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.Nomination of Next Extremaduran regional election for deletion
[edit]The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Next Extremaduran regional election until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.2027 Barcelona municipal election
[edit]Hi, I see you reverted my edit on 2027 Barcelona municipal election. Why? I changed an outdated 2025 source. The "Aliança.cat" abbreviation was used early when the party first contested, now most sources refer to it as "AC".
Regarding ideology, Aliança is hispanophobic in their autonomical purposes, but in municipal vision their main ideology is not hispanophobia, it is more of national conservatism (like the Vox party), as they reivindicate the local culture/businesses and want less taxes. I changed the term to a more adequate one for the ideology of the candidate. Srbuti (talk) 17:01, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
- Hi, responding to your questions:
- The 2025 source is not outdated, it reveals Aliança's intention to contest the 2027 municipal election in Barcelona. Additional sources on new developments can be added, but I do not know why that particular one can be considered as "outdated" since AC did not change its intention to contest. In addition, the new source provided was a primary source, which are typically discouraged.
- It is not clear how the party's ideology is substantially different at the municipal level; we do not typically list different ideologies for parties at the municipal level because their platforms are usually the same and/or based on the party's global platforms. Only in very specific, personalist platforms could you conceivably argue that different ideologies are of application (i.e. Trias in 2023), but so far Aragonès's one does not seem a platform that is different from the party's one.
- Impru20talk 10:39, 22 June 2026 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1923 in Spain by month
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Category:1923 in Spain by month indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 23:26, 27 June 2026 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1920 in Spain by month
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Category:1920 in Spain by month indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 23:27, 27 June 2026 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1920 in Spain by month
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Category:1920 in Spain by month indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 23:27, 27 June 2026 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1921 in Spain by month
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Category:1921 in Spain by month indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 23:30, 27 June 2026 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1919 in Spain by month
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Category:1919 in Spain by month indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 23:30, 27 June 2026 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1918 in Spain by month
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Category:1918 in Spain by month indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 23:30, 27 June 2026 (UTC)
Empty categories notices
[edit]Hello, Impru20,
You created a lot more categories that have now been emptied but I stopped posting notifications here because I didn't want to flood your User talk page with identical notices. This emptying of categories seems to be the result of a CFD closure that resulted in the deletion of categories that use to fill these categories. If you want to see the other categories, go to the 3rd page of the Empty Categories category or click here. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 00:09, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
July 2026
[edit]
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Second government of Alfonso Fernández Mañueco when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance.
Thank you. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:05, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
Leadership approval opinion polling for the next United Kingdom general election
[edit]There is much that is problematic about the terminology, wording of questions and choices offered by different pollsters. I think it all comes down to semantics. On the particular question that you have concerns about, I would say this:
(a) a question about performance as prime minister is about leadership approval, is it not? Other polls in the article have variations on the question "is Keir Starmer doing a good job ... as Prime Minister?".
(b) the "average" choice is simply offering a "middle way", analogous to other polls which offer e.g. "neither" (good/bad, favourable/unfavourable, positive/negative) or "neutral". The YouGov favourability polls may actually be outliers in not offering such a choice.
I think the polling questions fall into two main categories:
(1) performance related: approve/disapprove, good/bad job, doing well/not well, satisfied/dissatisfied, etc.
(2) likeability: favourable/unfavourable, like/dislike, positive/negative, etc.
As I said, it's a question of semantics. I think there should probably be a wider discussion about this, but the article's viewing figures are comparatively low these days, so I don't know how that would go.
@Chessrat: also has some concerns about the article. ~2026-35481-50 (talk) 17:05, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
Template talk:Yes#Colour change
[edit]Hi! Are you able to give your current thoughts at Template talk:Yes#Colour change? Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 22:54, 3 August 2026 (UTC)