User talk:Ianmacm

.Draft review query

Hello. Thank you for your comment. Could you please explain which specific part of WP:BIO you believe Draft:Ahad Bab still does not meet? I have tried to improve the draft by adding reliable sources and making the tone more encyclopedic. I would appreciate any guidance on what needs further improvement Peerharis666 (talk) 16:40, 12 July 2026 (UTC)

The article should read a lot more smoothly than it currently does. At the moment, Draft:Ahad Bab is a collection of short paragraphs taken from news stories. The result is more like a résumé than a rounded biography. There are specific problems with WP:ANYBIO because the article text does not really establish why he was a notable figure.--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 16:46, 12 July 2026 (UTC)

Phoneutria edits

The prose you mentioned about is too difficult to read and this is not the first time notable incidents mentioned in a page are bulleted instead of prosed. And the "reports of deaths" was made a subheading under "reported cases" subheading carrying lists of "non-death" cases, which is wrong. The correct way is to put them in the same subheading level as "Non-fatal cases" and "Fatal cases". NegativeOi (talk) 12:18, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

I found this worrying because it looks like the sort of thing that WP:LLM suggests. Google Gemini gives very similar answers.--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 12:27, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

I'm not sure how suspicions would summarily rule Wikipedia. In the reversals you made, you even kept the section "Behaviour" in its old status where the entire narrative is completely unsourced which is a violation, but apparently that doesn't bother you? Why do you allow completely unsourced sections? Also, you did not address the issue i raised that the subheadings "Reported cases" and "Reports of deaths" are in a totally wrong subheading level. I tried to fix them as "Non-Fatal cases" and "Fatal cases" subheadings for clarity. It's unbelievable you prefer to leave the page in a confusing state. NegativeOi (talk) 12:49, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

This version of the article makes excessive use of bulleted lists, and the use of bold text is also non-standard. By all means add some more sourcing, but keep the article in a traditional prose style.--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 12:57, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

Prosper family

Can you fix my citations? Edittorzzzz (talk) 18:37, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

I've had a look at this, however it should be said that the article already mentions that he was fascinated with Columbine.--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 18:46, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sayenko suprunyuck.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sayenko suprunyuck.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:55, 9 August 2026 (UTC)