User talk:Henrydat

Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (geographic names)

I don't know whether you've been warned previously since you seem to be aggressively working to hide others' complaints about you. So consider this your only and final warning. The next time you remove other editors' comments from any talk page other than this one, as you've recently done twice here you will be blocked from editing that page, if not blocked from editing anything except this page. wbm1058 (talk) 08:29, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

I haven't read this. I make a habit of keeping the talk page clean, please check the history. Henrydat (talk) 11:04, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Oh, that's what you should do. Henrydat (talk) 11:19, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic Wikipedia:VIETPLACE. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 08:33, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

@Wbm1058 I said that I have no time to read it. Please explain it right here if you have the time. Henrydat (talk) 11:01, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

July 2026

You have been blocked temporarily from editing from certain pages (Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (geographic names)) for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request through the unblock wizard or through your talk page. Alternatively, add the following text directly to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  wbm1058 (talk) 11:17, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Fram already correctly removed your posts from the Admin Noticeboard, but to reiterate: you need to explain coherently what the problem is, it needs to be a problem requiring admin attention, and you need to inform other users you post about of the discussion. You seem to be having trouble communicating clearly: maybe slow down, take a break, read our policies and guidelines, and only make edits and comments once you're sure it's the right thing to do and that you're communicating clearly. Continue like you have been and you'll likely be blocked entirely from editing. Fences&Windows 13:37, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

@Fences and windows My device is lagging, that page is heavy and I did not receive any notification. Henrydat (talk) 21:45, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

I was going to edit "talking about", is that what you meant? Henrydat (talk) 22:01, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

@Fences and windows Perhaps I shouldn't edit that page; it seems uneditable. What should I do now? Henrydat (talk) 22:28, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

@Fences and windows I copied that from WP:AN. It wasn't important before, so I didn't think about it. Henrydat (talk) 22:55, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for insufficient English competency, as well as WP:CANVASS concerns, as exhibited at ANI.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request through the unblock wizard or through your talk page.  _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:39, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Henrydat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

My device is lagging, that page is heavy and I did not receive any notification for two times. Perhaps I should switch to using a computer.

Decline reason:

That does not explain the incoherent and aggressive comments on the noticeboard. Drmies (talk) 21:58, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Henrydat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

At least I received a notification, and what's the main point? Is that the reason for a block? I've never been there. I think I'm the accused there.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you:
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:29, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Henrydat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

But I didn't do anything, I've been blocked twice already. I was going to request to be moved to a subpage; I won't edit that page anymore. And don't block this page, it's easy to edit. It's easier now, maybe I charged the device, it got too hot, that's why I stopped earlier.

Decline reason:

TPA revoked. voorts (talk/contributions) 00:25, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If you do not stop submitting frivolous unblock requests, your talk page access will be revoked. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:56, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

@User:Voorts I received this. I won't do it again. But the reason is frivolous, too. Henrydat (talk) 23:07, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

If that's your position, you are almost certainly not going to be unblocked. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:08, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

@Voorts Why? I was rollbacker at Wikidata and is patroller at Commons. I always follow the policies. Please let me know if I don't know, I'm a new user here. Sorry for this comment. I simply won't edit that page, but I didn't want to. I'm using a tablet and it's quite old; however, I have many devices but I don't use them. Henrydat (talk) 23:22, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

You have 2900 edits. You are not a new user. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:23, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

@Voorts No, I'm using cat-a-lot. I'm active at Commons. Henrydat (talk) 23:26, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Please tell me what I should do? Henrydat (talk) 23:33, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Follow the instructions that have been provided to you in the block and unblock notices. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:42, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

@Voorts But I didn't do anything. Sorry about my ping. Henrydat (talk) 23:45, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

@CambridgeBayWeather Can you update WP:VIETPLACE per consensus as I did at [] and , the discussion has been closed. I can't do anything with Phú Nhuận ward and Bà Rịa ward, it's my fault. And "hidden consensus" is no objection, it's just translation. Maybe I can't do anything more. Henrydat (talk) 00:04, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

As you are not currently an editor in good standing on English Wikipedia, you need to limit your editing to only issues directly relevant to your block. If and when you are unblocked, then you may be able to participate in discussions about English Wikipedia's content. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 00:07, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

No I can't as the discussion isn't closed. See Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (geographic names)#Places in Vietnam. Plus I see you are blocked so under no circumstances am I making edits at your request. CambridgeBayWeather (#1 deranged), Uqaqatigijaa (talk), Huliva 00:09, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  CambridgeBayWeather (#1 deranged), Uqaqatigijaa (talk), Huliva 00:13, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Phan Thiết, Lâm Đồng (August 11)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Balabush, left the following feedback:

This draft does not have sufficient content to warrant a standalone article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Phan Thiết.

• Edit the existing article to include your text and citations into an appropriate section.
• If the article is protected and you cannot edit it, propose your changes on the article's Talk page.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Phan Thiết, Lâm Đồng to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Balabush (talk) 14:26, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Henrydat! Having a draft declined at Articles for creation can be disappointing, but don't be discouraged, it's common when creating your first article. Need help? For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know. To understand why your draft was declined, please read the reviewer's feedback and follow any links to help pages you've been given. If you're still confused, try asking for advice at the Articles for creation Help desk. For peer support regarding all other editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a friendly question and answer hub for new editors. We'd love to see you there! Balabush (talk) 14:26, 11 August 2026 (UTC)