User talk:Debbstar

CS1 error on Lily Kong

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Lily Kong, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:44, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

June 2026

Hello, Debbstar, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections before editing further. Thank you. GoldRomean (talk) 15:05, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

Additionally, before editing further, please disclose if you have a conflict of interest with the topics you are editing about. Thanks, GoldRomean (talk) 15:05, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

I do not have a conflict of interest in the topics I'm currently editing. Debbstar (talk) 08:31, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/NatalieYJ. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request through the unblock wizard or through your talk page.  Sohom (talk) 19:29, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Debbstar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I am requesting a review of my indefinite block in connection with the NatalieYJ sockpuppet investigation.

I am a separate individual and have never owned, controlled, accessed or edited through any other accounts, and no other individual has controlled or accessed my account. NatalieYJ asked me and other individuals to help review and update information on a Wikipedia article. Each person used their own account.

At the time, I believed that having separate people verify and edit individual facts was consistent with Wikipedia’s requirements. I now understand that because we had been working on the same article, our activity could be regarded as coordinated editing or meatpuppetry and did not constitute independent editorial review. I thus made the conflict-of-interest that I had no affiliation to the subject as I am not an employee of SMU.

If unblocked, I will use only this account, will not coordinate edits or ask anyone to edit on my behalf. Any future suggestions concerning a connected subject will be made transparently through the relevant Talk page, with my connection fully disclosed, so that an uninvolved editor can assess them. I am willing to accept an appropriate restriction on editing the Lily Kong article if this would address the concern.

I apologise for misunderstanding the applicable rules and for the disruption caused. I would be grateful if an uninvolved administrator could review the block in light of this explanation. Debbstar (talk) 04:08, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I do not find this explanation plausible in light of the SPI. voorts (talk/contributions) 16:46, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.