User talk:BhikhariInformer

A belated welcome!

The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, BhikhariInformer! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introductory tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Writing an article
• Five pillars of Wikipedia
• Community portal
• Help pages
• The Teahouse (newcomer help)
• Main help desk

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Tousif ❯❯❯ Talk 07:50, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manan Bhardwaj (July 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Maliner were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Manan Bhardwaj and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Maliner (talk) 17:00, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello, BhikhariInformer! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Maliner (talk) 17:00, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manush (film) (July 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft or article is about an unreleased film. The film notability guideline identifies three stages in the production cycle for films:

• 1. Planned films that have not begun production (principal photography or animation). These planned films do not satisfy film notability.
• 2. Films that are confirmed by reliable sources to have begun production, but have not been released. These films are only notable if production itself satisfies general notability in terms of significant coverage. Mere mention of the start of production does not satisfy notability.
• 3. Films that have been released, whose notability is determined by reception and reviews, or a major notable award for excellence in some aspect of filmmaking.

This film page must be evaluated based on general notability of production.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Manush (film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 21:25, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

Byomkesh O Durgo Rahasya moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Byomkesh O Durgo Rahasya. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because It is an unreleased film and does not satisfy the notability rules for unreleased films.. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Robert McClenon (talk) 08:15, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Byomkesh O Durgo Rahasya has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Byomkesh O Durgo Rahasya. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:33, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Biye Bibhrat (August 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Biye Bibhrat instead.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft has information that is not in the article and should be added to the article. Please compare and combine the draft and the article. You may ask for advice about comparing and combining a draft and an article at the Teahouse.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Biye Bibhrat and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:20, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from 5th Filmfare Awards Bangla into Draft:6th Filmfare Awards Bangla. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:34, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Okay. I will do that for my next edits if I copy information. And I will provide attribution to my old edits in which I remember to have copied little formats cause I didn't knew them properly. BhikhariInformer (talk) 05:34, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 6th Filmfare Awards Bangla (August 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• Draft:6th Filmfare Awards Bangla may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fade258 (talk) 07:13, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shibpur (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SVF. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Raktabeej (September 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ARandomName123 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This is too soon. Wait until the movie has released, and it has received a few reviews before resubmitting.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Raktabeej and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 15:05, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 6th Filmfare Awards Bangla (September 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sohom Datta was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

All references are first-party, eithier from the newspapers owned by the Times Group or the awards website.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:6th Filmfare Awards Bangla and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sohom (talk) 19:23, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 6th Filmfare Awards Bangla (September 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I briefly browsed the sources and they appear to be press releases and advertorials. --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 06:39, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:6th Filmfare Awards Bangla and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 06:39, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 6th Filmfare Awards Bangla (September 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OlifanofmrTennant was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:6th Filmfare Awards Bangla and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

OLIfanofmrtennant 03:37, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manan Bhardwaj (October 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Akshithmanya was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Manan Bhardwaj and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Akshithmanya ^talk 00:54, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Raktabeej (October 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Raktabeej and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 12:37, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Raktabeej has been accepted

Raktabeej, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– DreamRimmer (talk) 15:57, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

@DreamRimmer: Thank you.

BhikhariInformer (talk) 16:16, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, BhikhariInformer. Thank you for your work on Raktabeej. User:DreamRimmer, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please do not copy and paste entire review paragraphs. Instead, provide a brief summary in your own words.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|DreamRimmer}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

– DreamRimmer (talk) 16:03, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

@DreamRimmer: Okay I will keep that in mind from my next edits.

BhikhariInformer (talk) 16:14, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manan Bhardwaj (November 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Close but not quite enough independent significant coverage. Some of the sources are interviews.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Manan Bhardwaj and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 05:34, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manush: Child of Destiny has been accepted

Manush: Child of Destiny, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 20:09, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pradhan (film) has been accepted

Pradhan (film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Toadette ^{(Happy holiday!)} 08:59, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Manan Bhardwaj has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Manan Bhardwaj. Thanks! ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 16:36, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manan Bhardwaj has been accepted

Manan Bhardwaj, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 11:32, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Box Office Collection

Heyy@BhikhariInformer your recent edit at Salaar: Part 1 – Ceasefire is reverted by someone. Assuming as your edit as Good faith, I want to tell you that we at ICTF don't consider production house figure or any primary source that cites Production house Figures as reliable as they are highly manipulated and especially south one which are infamous for that, a recent example we have of Kabzaa. We uses Independent box office trackers mainly like Bollywood Hungama , Box Office India, or Pinkvilla. I hope you understood. Thanks Tousif ❯❯❯ Talk 13:46, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the information. I will keep it in mind while doing any further box office updates. BhikhariInformer (talk) 03:27, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

January 2024

Hello, I'm Daniel Quinlan. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Pradhan (film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:43, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

@Daniel Quinlan:

I updated the latest numbers of 3 week collection but by mistake I attached the citation stating the box office till 2 weeks. I have attached citation from the same site which is currently cited in the article. Although not considered reliable according to Wikipedia, it provides almost accurate box office numbers for many Bengali films and is considered as a source of box office collection in Bengali industry. I hope that citation would be okay.

Thanks BhikhariInformer (talk) 16:06, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Pradhan (film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 08:10, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:6th Filmfare Awards Bangla

Hello, BhikhariInformer. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:6th Filmfare Awards Bangla, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:07, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Bengali films of 2019, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rahul Banerjee.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:08, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

I have corrected it. BhikhariInformer (talk) 05:43, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, BhikhariInformer. Thank you for your work on 6th Filmfare Awards Bangla. Kencf0618, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice job!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Kencf0618}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

kencf0618 (talk) 11:52, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

@Kencf0618:

Thanks

BhikhariInformer (talk) 12:47, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

April 2024

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 06:33, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Okay. I will keep that in mind for any further edits.

Thanks BhikhariInformer (talk) 06:46, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Once again, please use edit summaries when you are adding or changing content. Thanks. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 12:57, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please refer to WP:ICTFSOURCES promptly. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 05:32, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Okay.

BhikhariInformer (talk) 06:21, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. — Newslinger talk 09:57, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

You have recently made edits related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. — Newslinger talk 09:57, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

@Newslinger:

Over the last few months, I have edited a number of articles regarding living or deceased people: mostly actors, actresses, film makers, music composers and singers. So, could you tell me the name of the particular biographical articles, editing for which caused my to receive this message.

Becoz I would like to know which type of edits were wrong in the biographical articles. Then I would refrain myself in the future from such edits.

Thanks BhikhariInformer (talk) 15:04, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi BhikhariInformer, the above messages are standard notices issued to editors who demonstrate interest in contentious topics. Many editors participating in contentious topics receive a notice for each topic area. As stated in the notice text, receiving these types of messages "does not imply that there are any issues with your editing". I included the notice about the "living or recently deceased people" contentious topic only because you have been editing biographies of living people, as you mention.

These contentious topic notices are not to be confused with warnings such as the one I posted in #May 2024; warnings are issued in response to edits that fall short of meeting a policy or guideline in some way. Per the verifiability policy, "All material in Wikipedia mainspace, including everything in articles, lists, and captions, must be verifiable. All quotations, and any material whose verifiability has been challenged or is likely to be challenged, must include an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the material." Additionally, "A source 'directly supports' a given piece of material if the information is present explicitly in the source so that using this source to support the material is not a violation of Wikipedia:No original research."

Within contentious topics, articles tend to be scrutinized more closely to ensure that they are compliant with policies and guidelines, including the verifiability policy. Please make sure your edits are adequately supported by cited reliable sources before submitting them, especially when the article subject is controversial. Thanks. — Newslinger talk 21:43, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Okay. I got it.

Thanks

BhikhariInformer (talk) 05:55, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Malayalam films 2024

It was a practice agreed and followed by editors to keep either 5 films or not to have BO section at all for Malayalam films list pages, as keeping more films led to more fights and reverts and we did not want Wiki to become a fanfight page like FB. Better discuss first and then revert than the other way around.
Anish Viswa 03:50, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Okay. Now I get the point. Would keep in mind while editing Malayalam film lists.

Thanks BhikhariInformer (talk) 02:21, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

Concerns over addition of sources

Hey, please don't add obviously unreliable sources to articles as you did at 6th_Filmfare_Awards_Bangla. Indiablooms and Desiblitz are not reliable. Sohom (talk) 05:23, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

@Sohom Datta:

Okay.

But

Just a question. Desiblitz I understand. But Indiablooms is a website which I have noticed, they write neutral news on upcoming Bengali movies. Nothing like fan pages. Also they cover promotional events. So can you inform me why is it stll unreliable.

Thanks

BhikhariInformer (talk) 10:45, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Abir Chatterjee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Epic.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:24, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

Rectified it. BhikhariInformer (talk) 05:09, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

June 2024

Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. You edits to Kalki 2898 AD were unconstructive. Sacnilk source or any news media (Hindustan Times and Indian Express) publishing claims made by the film's makers and its production company are unreliable. Source needs to be secondary independent. RangersRus (talk) 17:40, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Hey, you did it again. Please be careful next time. There are edit notices everywhere regarding WP:FRUIT. Thanks. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 06:12, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

Kalki box office

There are multiple users who still don't believe 84 million is 700 crore approximately they are changing the box office collection back to 600 please ensure that does not happen 2409:40F3:1014:8A43:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 15:17, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kaliachak Chapter 1, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malda.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:00, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Rectified😊😁 BhikhariInformer (talk) 12:29, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chiranjeet Chakraborty, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Partha Chatterjee.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:00, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Fixed BhikhariInformer (talk) 03:43, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bohurupi (2024)

Hello BhikhariInformer,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Bohurupi (2024) for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Bohurupi (2024) to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bobby Cohn (talk) 13:54, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of highest-grossing Indian Bengali films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dunki.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:51, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

Fixed BhikhariInformer (talk) 01:57, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

Re your proposed move

Please be advised that discussion about changing the title of the Adam's Bridge article are prohibited by a moratorium. Please see Talk:Adam's Bridge and the FAQ on that page. You are hardly the first person and won't be the last to propose changing the title, but the current title is in accordance with Wikipedia policy. 331dot (talk) 10:58, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Shastri (2024 film)

Sir, please add the reception section in the article Shastri (2024 film), as you did in Tekka (film). Izno Paglu (talk) 15:21, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

Done BhikhariInformer (talk) 02:05, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:King (rapper) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:King (rapper). Thanks! Tavantius (talk) 18:53, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: King (rapper) has been accepted

King (rapper), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 24% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tavantius (talk) 19:25, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Abir Chatterjee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Statesman.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

Fixed BhikhariInformer (talk) 08:01, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

Tota Roy Chowdhury wikipage problem

In Tota Roy Chowdhury wiki page award section and reference section has been merged pls check and do the needful. MDas2024 (talk) 16:37, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Done. Resolved the issue.

But next time onwards in any future edits, if you are not sure regarding any edit, please do practice in your

sandbox before publishing it. BhikhariInformer (talk) 17:08, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Thanks MDas2024 (talk) 17:16, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bhool Bhulaiyaa 3, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mint.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:52, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Rectified. BhikhariInformer (talk) 01:53, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Khadaan (marketing section)

Sir, according to me, the marketing strategy of the film should be described with more brief infos. The production team is promoting the film with massively. They are producing various T-shirts, which should be included in the article. I request you to add those infos, with a proper research. Thus, I will edit the production section, which is till incomplete.

Thank you. Made in Kolkata (talk) 13:09, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

I agree. Those infos should be included. If you can find references on those, then you can simply add them. I will also try to see for references, so that they can be added.

And one thing, I noticed you have added almost 10 citations after the first song. So many references just for a single song is really unnecessary. All of them provide almost same info. Besides, it will also probably spoil the visual representation of the article for neutral readers. Hence, I would suggest you to remove at least half of them. 3-4 citations for a song will be good enough.

Thanks BhikhariInformer (talk) 13:48, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Sir, those references can be there. If you visit Jawan, Pushpa, KGF or any other article, there are also a number of citations for a single information.

Can't the marketing section be made lengthy? Yesterday the team promoted the film with various strategies. Made in Kolkata (talk) 04:53, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

I have shredded off 3-4 references after the first song. Because it was looking clumsy as per the WP:CONSECUTIVECITE. Now it's okay.

As of the marketing section, I have added the merchandise info since you asked. Do add the references on that topic if you find them. BhikhariInformer (talk) 05:03, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

Shontaan

Sir, please develop the article Shontaan by adding more references. If there is any faults there, it should be corrected by you.

Thank you. Made in Kolkata (talk) 12:15, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

@Made in Kolkata The article you have created consists of a good number of references after the lines. You have nicely created the article, specially a well designed production section. Good job with that.

And about the references, I will suggest that you add them (You will have a better idea about the references since you created the article in a detailed manner) from reliable sources to the article, where there are no references present. If 2-3 references already present after a line, then no need to add any more.

Thanks BhikhariInformer (talk) 12:57, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

Thank you sir for your compliment. I am unable to add the poster as the pic is not in my device. So if you do it, I shall be obliged.

Sir, I want your suggetion for something. You may know that its Superstar Jeet's birthday tomorrow. So, if he make any announcement of his upcoming projects, can I begin the drafts of those early? Made in Kolkata (talk) 13:03, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

@Made in Kolkata As of the poster of Shontaan, I will add it.

Coming to the drafts, as per WP:DRAFT and WP:NFF, you can begin your drafts on those articles. But, you may move those articles to mainspace only when they are close to their release dates and a significant amount of coverage and information is present from reliable sources. And one thing, if you don't edit the draft for 6 months, it will be deleted.

Thanks BhikhariInformer (talk) 13:32, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

I know it. Made in Kolkata (talk) 13:41, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Arijit Singh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Business Today.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

Resolved BhikhariInformer (talk) 09:33, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tarapith Temple, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mahadev.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

Resolved BhikhariInformer (talk) 13:09, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

Seasonal greetings:)

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2025!

Hello BhikhariInformer, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2025. Happy editing, — Benison (Beni · talk) 18:25, 22 December 2024 (UTC) @Benison. Wishing a merry Christmas and Happy New Year 2025.🎊🎊 May the new year usher in an annum of happiness, success and good health for you and your close ones.🎄🎄 BhikhariInformer (talk) 01:43, 23 December 2024 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

— Benison (Beni · talk) 18:25, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shontaan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SVF.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

Fixed BhikhariInformer (talk) 09:02, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Firingi Kalibari, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page European.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Moving drafts to main space

Please tidy up after yourself. Always check the end product 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 17:54, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

@Timtrent Thank you sir for the advice. I would definitely check the end product with more precision, if I create any future articles.

But umm... could you please just like clarify once again what was my mistake. I mean do I need to

• fix my grammatical expressions ?

or

• does the article not fit the encyclopedic tone of writing ?

or

• should I have submitted the article for review before moving it to mainspace ?

or

• is there any issue regarding the notability of the article ?

It would be helpful if you could point out my errors. I would be able to work on them.

Thanks

BhikhariInformer (talk) 02:40, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

If I recall correctly, you left AFC banners in place. If you are confident in moving the draft I saw because you are certain it will meet all criteria, please do so and tidy the end product up 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 09:24, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Okay. Thanks.

BhikhariInformer (talk) 16:01, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Madan Mohan Temple, Cooch Behar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anjali.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Premendu Bikash Chaki has been accepted

Premendu Bikash Chaki, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rahmatula786 (talk) 11:42, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 8th Filmfare Awards Bangla, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Femina.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

Regarding Bramhaarjun

Hello—

I saw your note on the Bramhaarjun Wikipedia page. I wanted to let you know that I’ve removed the article in accordance with Wikipedia:ICTFSOURCES BengalMC (talk) 05:08, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for actively shredding off the unreliable sources. I have removed the "Unreliable sources" tag from the article. Just a small suggestion.....the number of references seem very less(Only 7). If available, then please add a few more sources from reliable sites.

Besides, on my behalf, I would like to thank you for actively working and creating new articles in the Bengali film industry related space.

Thanks

Happy editing! BhikhariInformer (talk) 06:58, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Eken 2nd Film Poster.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Eken 2nd Film Poster.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Nice editor

Hi. Dear. I saw your contributions. Nice. Bt the name is very wired and funny. Im Indian. Nice to know you. I hope we can be a good colleague. Can i get your email id. Thanks. Ronit creator (talk) 06:21, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello BhikhariInformer! Your additions to Hoichoi have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license—to request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § Licensing.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:51, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for correcting me. I didn't realize that it was copyrighted info.

I went over the part that was removed from the article, but I didn't quite understand why was it copyrighted😅. So, if you don't mind, would you please teach me in simple words regarding the copyrighted sources🙏. A clear understanding about copyrighted sources would surely help me in the future to be more cautious before adding any copyrighted info. BhikhariInformer (talk) 02:54, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

The content you added was a match for prose on this webpage. It's marked at the bottom as "Copyright © 2025 The Indian Express [P] Ltd. All Rights Reserved". Most webpages have a copyright notice at the bottom. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 03:34, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

Now I get it. Thanks a lot.

BhikhariInformer (talk) 03:40, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

August 2025

Your edit to Draft:Lojja has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:51, 11 August 2025 (UTC)

Apologies. I thought adding the short summary in direct words from a source would be better than adding in my own words. Didn't realise it would end up in copyright violation.

Would be more careful further....BhikhariInformer (talk) 17:18, 11 August 2025 (UTC)

Jatileswar Temple

The history of this temple is very old. So please help to complete this page.This temple is a state protected monument. Mr. Roy 2001 (talk) 15:15, 11 August 2025 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hello BhikhariInformer! The thread you created at the Teahouse, List of schools in Bengaluru, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:04, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

Discussion on Raghu Dakat

Sir, aren't the references you've added in the draft, should be archived? Tiger Shankar (talk) 20:05, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

It's always better if references are archived. The WP:IABOT runs continuously across all articles and adds archived versions to fix link rots. But, to perform it manually, one can run the WP:IABOT on individual pages or else use web archiving cites like the Wayback Machine. I don't use the bot, and individually archiving all the references is time consuming and beyond my patience. So, if you can archive them, please do so. For details, see Help:Archiving a source.

Thanks - BhikhariInformer (talk) 04:17, 27 August 2025 (UTC)

Thank you sir🙏 Tiger Shankar (talk) 07:07, 27 August 2025 (UTC)

Hoichoi

What is your connection to this topic? You say that you don't know anyone at Hoichoi but that is not a direct answer. Were you paid or do have an employment connection in any form with Hoichoi? Your editing gives the impression that you do. CNMall41 (talk) 18:19, 7 September 2025 (UTC)

I am not connected to the subject in any manner, nor do I have any employment. (I am just a first year guy in college). It's just that I was very enthusiastic about writing a "good, long" article when I saw there are plenty of sources available. While doing that, I failed to recognize that many of the sources were promotional. If my editing on Hoichoi parts an impression of COI and violates NPOV, it was unknown and unwanted on my behalf. (To be honest, till date, I am not very well handed at differentiating promotional articles from neutral ones; but yes.....I am working on it).

.

Since yesterday, I have curtailed from Hoichoi, things which I understood as promotional. I would surely try to clean up the unwanted issue that I have unknowingly created. (Because, after all, a good track record would be really necessary, since I aspire to have the NPR and ROLLBACK rights in future).

Thanks - BhikhariInformer (talk) 02:34, 8 September 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Khadaan poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Khadaan poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 9 September 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of Hoichoi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hoichoi, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hoichoi (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 11 September 2025 (UTC)

Requesting some article expansion & c/e help

Hi,

Greetings @BhikhariInformer, I am User:Bookku. I initiate and support update in information and knowledge gap areas on WP wherever whenever possible. Time to time, also invite other users in draft/ article expansion work for diversity in inputs.

Presently working on the draft User:Bookku/Indian sceptre.

Requesting you to visit the draft article User:Bookku/Indian sceptre and provide article expansion, copy edit or any suitable input help in the draft if the topic interests you.

Just fyi: How I came to user name? My general way is mentioned on my user page. In this specific instance: From India deletion discussion list page.

In particular your user profile your interest in numismatics. Numismatics is the part in the draft User:Bookku/Indian sceptre difficult to navigate for me. Please if it's possible to help me out in that respect too.

Thanks Bookku (talk) 02:57, 3 October 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for extending the warm invitation! I will visit the numismatics section of the draft and will surely try to contribute to it, if I find anything.

Thanks 😊 BhikhariInformer (talk) 02:37, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Many thanks for offering your support to the article numismatics section. Will keenly waiting for the same. warm regards. Bookku (talk) 02:58, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Oct 2025

Hello @BhikhariInformer Hope you are doing fine. I want to ask you one thing. Yesterday you marked user (Gujjar.rudraa) as the creator of Vijay Nahar article on AfD. But as i can see the creator of that page is @Tapanvnahar (who was blocked). TheSlumPanda (talk) 08:43, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

Oh.....really sorry for any inconvenience owing to that. I have really no idea how did I made the error. I will revert my edit and would surely be more cautious in the future. Thanks for pointing out my error. BhikhariInformer (talk) 12:17, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Discussion on Lawho Gouranger Naam Rey

@BhikhariInformer sir, Lawho Gouranger Naam Rey needs to be more prominent, as there are so many informations missing in it. Please add those informations, when it was previously announced and stalled, principal photography etc. Besides, the film needs a separate article on the soundtrack.

As I am working on Projapati 2 and also beginning on its soundtrack, I am requesting you to look into the matter.

Thank you🙏 Tiger Shankar (talk) 08:26, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

Alright.....I will expand Lawho Gouranger Naam Rey. And as of the soundtrack, it probably doesn't have enough sources to justify a separate article. Let it remain as a sub-section under the article for now. If it gains significant coverage post the film's release, the soundtrack can be split into a separate article at that time. And for your work on Projapati 2, cheers mate! BhikhariInformer (talk) 16:02, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

Ok sir.

For the soundtrack article, you may found sources about Kabir Suman's addition to the film, Arijit Singh's "Khawne Gorachand..." is already a chartbuster, there must be sources about these. Tiger Shankar (talk) 05:06, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

Seasonal Greetings

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2026!

Hello BhikhariInformer, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2026. Happy editing, KhantWiki (talk) 22:13, 25 December 2025 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

KhantWiki (talk) 22:13, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

Wishing you a belated Merry Christmas and a truly blessed Happy New Year 2026. May 2026 usher in annum of happiness and success in your life, and may you grow strong bonds with you near and dear ones. BhikhariInformer (talk) 03:36, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

Seasonal Greetings

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2026!

Hello BhikhariInformer, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2026. Happy editing, Arupkumarsaha0 (talk) 19:48, 28 December 2025 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Arupkumarsaha0 (talk) 19:50, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

Wishing you a belated Merry Christmas and a truly blessed Happy New Year 2026. May the new year usher in annum of happiness and success in your life. May your friends, family and you have peace and prosperity in your lives. BhikhariInformer (talk) 01:36, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

Wishing you a happy 2026!

• 
• 
• 

Happy New Year!

• 
  MMXXVI Lunar Calendar

BhikhariInformer,
Have a great 2026 and thanks for your continued contributions to Wikipedia.

---

   – Background color is Very Peri (#6868ab), Pantone's 2026 Color of the year

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2026}} to user talk pages.

– CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:23, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

Happy New Year, BhikhariInformer!

Happy New Year!

BhikhariInformer,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 14:00, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 14:00, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

New Years 2026

Hello BhikhariInformer: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, ★Iluziya7 (talk) 16:52, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

★Iluziya7 (talk) 16:52, 31 December 2025 (UTC) Iluziya7 (talk) 16:52, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the greetings. Hope this new year ushers in an annum of happiness and success for you and your loved ones. BhikhariInformer (talk) 16:59, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

@BhikhariInformer. Oh, what you said! (Iluziya7 (talk) 17:04, 31 December 2025 (UTC))

Happy New Year BhikhariInformer!

Happy New Year!

Hello BhikhariInformer:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve the encyclopedia for Wikipedia's readers, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, Fylindfotberserk (talk) 19:46, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

  

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks (static)}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

Fylindfotberserk (talk) 19:46, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

Happy New Year, BhikhariInformer!

Happy New Year!

BhikhariInformer,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
aggarwala2727 (talk) 23:19, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Happy New Year 2026 wishes and greetings. Wishing you a peaceful and prosperous year ahead!

• 
• 
• 

Happy New Year!

• 
  MMXXVI Lunar Calendar

BikhariInformer,
Have a great 2026 and thanks for your continued contributions to Wikipedia.

---

   – Background color is Very Peri (#6868ab), Pantone's 2026 Color of the year

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2026}} to user talk pages.

Happy New Year 2026, BikhariInformer! 🎆 May your days be filled with success, happiness and peace. Wishing you all the best.. Much love and respect from Myanmar. KhantWiki (talk) 04:19, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Thanks for the message. I hope the new year is great for you! Red Director (talk) 06:46, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Happy New Year, BhikhariInformer!

Happy New Year!

BhikhariInformer,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Sixaxis^Yes 14:21, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Sixaxis^Yes 14:21, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Re:Happy New Year, Anupam!

Dear User:BhikhariInformer, thank you for your kind wishes! I wish you and yours a very Happy New Year! With regards, Anupam^Talk 18:29, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Discussions on Projapati 2 box office

@BhikhariInformer, sir I would be greatly obliged if you take down the box office as per the WBBO reports [1] in the article Projapati 2. Tiger Shankar (talk) 06:26, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

I’m a bit confused, so I wanted to clarify a few things first:

1. The WBBO source you sent me, mentions the gross box office to be 5 crore.

2. But in your latest edit to the article, you changed the box office to 10.44 crore. That's a contradiction.

So, can you please explain why this difference and also tell what do you expect me to do. I would be happy to look again. BhikhariInformer (talk) 09:56, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

However the figure was 5.48 crore previously, it has been changed. Now you look into the matter Tiger Shankar (talk) 19:04, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Happy New Year, BhikhariInformer!

Happy New Year!

BhikhariInformer,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Volten001 ^☎ 06:34, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Volten001 ^☎ 06:34, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Assamese cinema

There is currently a discussion at Talk:Assamese_cinema#Reliable sources regarding an issue. You can join the discussion if you like. Goswami21 (talk) 00:31, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Assamese cinema

There is currently a discussion at Talk:Assamese_cinema#Request to retain box office table with attributed figures regarding an issue. You can join the discussion if you like. Goswami21 (talk) 14:56, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Thanks!

Hello, thank you!! for finding those sources for the tarapith rathyatra page. Also just curious if you have any tips for searching for non-english sources, as most of the sources you had linked hadn't come up for me when I had looked. EM (talk) 15:04, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello! You're very welcome. I'm glad that the sources were useful!

For non-English sources, I usually translate the keywords with a translator and then, search in the local script. Like তারাপীঠ রথযাত্রা for Tarapith Rathyatra.

Besides all....hope you are having a productive and cheerful 2026. Wishing you a belated New Year 2026! BhikhariInformer (talk) 16:56, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

oh, okay! that's helpful to know and will try it next time. Happy (belated) new year to you as well! EM (talk) 15:52, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Vijaynagar'er Hirey: Box office

@BhikhariInformer sir, I shall be greatly obliged if you take down the box office section of Vijaynagar'er Hirey.

Thank you🙏 Tiger Shankar (talk) 05:01, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

I still haven't found any RS about the box office of this film. Will keep a close eye and try to update the page as per available sources. BhikhariInformer (talk) 15:44, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

RS have been added by me in the box office section of the article. Now it's your duty to expand the portion🙏 Tiger Shankar (talk) 16:44, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

 Done BhikhariInformer (talk) 02:26, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Thank you very much👌 Tiger Shankar (talk) 05:15, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Deep Fridge moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Deep Fridge. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and the Controversy section is uneccessary and borders on trivia . I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ArthurTheGardener (talk) 13:39, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Kadaisi Thotta

Isn't List of Tamil films of 2025 a better redirect target? @Jeraxmoira: DareshMohan (talk) 02:36, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

Agreed. That's surely a better and more convenient redirect target. But since the page has now already been directed, can the redirect be reverted and be redirected to List of Tamil films of 2025? If yes, I totally support that. BhikhariInformer (talk) 10:19, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

Ways to improve Advocate Achinta Aich

Hello, BhikhariInformer,

Thank you for creating Advocate Achinta Aich.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

YouTube shouldn't be added as source.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SaTnamZIN}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

SatnaamIN (talk) 07:12, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Deep Fridge has been accepted

Deep Fridge, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 24% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

monkey_smashing^keyboards (talk) 19:17, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi BhikhariInformer. Thank you for your work on Nishir Daak (TV series). Another editor, SaTnamZIN, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Add more reviews

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SaTnamZIN}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

SatnaamIN (talk) 21:26, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Schools without references

Hi BhikhariInformer! I see you're still weeding through Namibian schools. From my perspective, an article like Oshali West Combined School could just be prodded, there is really nothing except an entry in a thousand-long government list. --Pgallert (talk) 07:49, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for the suggestion! Actually, I have very low confidence levels in myself and have poor decision making abilities. So, while nominating, I usually avoid PROD since I always have an irrational fear that "I might be deleting something notable....so let's take it to AFD and let the community decide." But I will try to use PROD for clearly non-notable articles like this one, if I encounter any in the future. ^⁠_⁠^ BhikhariInformer (talk) 10:14, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ranjan Ghosh, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bengali cinema was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 22:36, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Collège Saint-Servais (Liège)

Thank you for closing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Collège Saint-Servais (Liège) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surur Hoda. Your closes were correct. But when closing an XfD, please add the {{nacd}} tag to indicate this was a non-admin closure, as per WP:NACD. Thanks! Owen× ☎ 20:06, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Okay! I'll follow it. Thanks for your guidance and correcting me. ^⁠_⁠^ BhikhariInformer (talk) 03:50, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Discussions on moving

@BhikhariInformer sir please move this Draft:Keu Bole Biplabi Keu Bole Dakat Tiger Shankar (talk) 07:33, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

I would prefer not to move it unilaterally to mainspace since it's already been draftified once via AFD. Doing so might result in draftification again or at worst, might be SALTED. So, I would suggest....you can submit the draft if you think it meets WP:NFILM now. Thanks! BhikhariInformer (talk) 10:02, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Ok sir. Another problematic edit I would suggest you to look into, that's Prosenjit Chatterjee filmography. In that article, the table is not published properly, the specific boxes having film's name, are not colourized align separately.

Thank you🙏 Tiger Shankar (talk) 13:31, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

I don't see any immediate issue with the page. Can you please clarify what problem have you noticed? Thanks! BhikhariInformer (talk) 14:44, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

@BhikhariInformer sir you also contribute to the draft, till it is prepared to be live. Tiger Shankar (talk) 05:21, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Okay. 👍 BhikhariInformer (talk) 06:19, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

@Tiger Shankar:, Please see WP:CANVASS. Going to an editor over another because you feel they will help WP:BLUDGEON your cause is not acceptable. Clean up is always good but this should not be moved prior to reviews, which will likely come after release. Given the canvassing, bludgeoning, and creating under an alternative name to avoid detection, I would suggest you step away as your editing gives the strong impression of having a WP:COI. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:07, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Kim.vo

Hi, how are you? I have a suggestion: this Kim Vo and her Wikipedia page are irrelevant; it doesn't offer any details other than her death. Could you open a request for its removal? AFD, apart from the fact that the only memorable event is about his death ~2026-16604-18 (talk) 05:48, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

 Done BhikhariInformer (talk) 06:17, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Sundergarh Ra Salman Khan

For the record, there is no TOI review for this film . DareshMohan (talk) 16:14, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Oh....I guess I mistook that page as a review. Thanks for pointing out the error I made in my BEFORE! BhikhariInformer (talk) 16:20, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi BhikhariInformer. Thank you for your work on Nikosh Chhaya. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 07:24, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hello BhikhariInformer! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Missing Draft!, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:03, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Here is a bingus for you as a thanks to your Afd contributions in the movie and schools!

Dz5t 8O12 (talk) 18:55, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

Verifiability of filmography or television section in BLPs of Indian Bengali actors or actresses

Hello! I wanted to reach out to you regarding an issue I’ve been thinking about lately, specifically the verifiability of filmographies and television sections within the Biographies of Living Persons (BLPs) for Indian Bengali actors and actresses.

As you know, in the filmography sections, it’s common to list various films and roles, but often it’s difficult, and mostly impossible, to provide reliable sources for every cast member, since every cast member in a particular daily soap or film, isn't covered by the news media. Since Wikipedia guidelines dictate that unsourced content can be challenged and removed, I am wondering if this might lead to many filmographies, particularly for Bengali actors and films, being heavily stripped down, potentially leaving only a few cast members with verifiable references.

The guidelines themselves are undoubtedly important in maintaining the credibility and neutrality of Wikipedia, but I still wonder if these rules are entirely applicable to all cultural contexts, particularly to Indian and Bengali cinema. In Western media, where news outlets and reliable sources frequently cover every detail of a film’s production and cast, sourcing information is often relatively straightforward. However, in the case of Bengali cinema, much of the content is not as widely covered by mainstream media, especially in comparison to their Western counterparts.

In India, and specifically in Bengali cinema, many films and performances are known primarily through word of mouth or mostly from people who have watched the films or shows in real life, and extensive coverage in news outlets is often limited or absent mostly. Applying a strict Western-centric standard of sourcing to content related to Bengali films can (already done so in the past) lead to the removal of valuable, albeit unsourced, information; information that is, true and widely recognized by audiences, even if not fully documented in the media.

Do you feel that the current guidelines are sometimes difficult to apply in such contexts, and that there is a need for greater flexibility, especially when dealing with regional cinema?

And, this concern extends beyond just filmographies; it also applies to the actor’s broader body of work. While we all know these actors have performed in various films, we may not always have concrete references to back up every claim, especially in regional cinema like Bengali films. The issue here is that these actors and their works are often known only to audiences who have seen the films, but without proper sourcing, this becomes problematic from a Wikipedia standpoint.

I’m interested in your perspective on this issue. Do you think that the current standards might lead to the removal of large chunks of content in such articles, or is there a more nuanced approach I might be missing? Considering your extensive contributions to the Wikipedia community, especially around Bengali films and web series, I thought you would be the ideal person to ask for clarification on this matter. Itcouldbepossible ^Talk 05:30, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for bringing this up — it’s actually a very real issue that I too often face, while trying to improve Bengali film and television actors' BLPs. I completely agree to your point — in many cases it’s genuinely difficult, and often impossible, to find a RS for every single role. A lot of this information is widely known to viewers but isn’t properly documented online.



It's really unfortunate that Wikipedia’s core policies like WP:V and WP:BLP are applied uniformly, regardless of region. That results in only widening the WP:SYSTEMICBIAS. There should probably have been a less strict guideline for under-documented industries, which are getting seriously affected due to the sourcing limitations. But, personally, I don't think we will have any such special guidelines at least in the near future, because, I am pretty sure that most editors would not support this idea, if a discussion ever takes place regarding this.



That said, in practice, this can sometimes make filmographies shorter, but that’s essentially the trade-off Wikipedia makes to maintain accuracy and reliability. It’s not ideal, but improving sourcing over time is probably a more sustainable approach than relaxing the guidelines. Thanks! 🙃 BhikhariInformer (talk) 10:34, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

Okay, I understood what you said, but let's say I take the example of this article written by you only, okay. Bishohori (TV series). So basically, even though I have seen the series myself, I can still be blunt and remove the cast section or specifically cast members that have been added without any source and claim that they are not verifiable and that's why they have been removed. Isn't this actually very funny and paradoxical? (Don't worry, am not going to do such a thing obv...just thought of asking so, with an example from one of your article's only). Itcouldbepossible ^Talk 11:14, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

I get your point. That's an issue indeed. In Bishohori (TV series), I have changed the referencing pattern in the cast — one reference for the whole section. The t2Online reference has the cast names. So that will suffice here.



I've created 30+ Bengali films and web series' pages but haven't watched any of them. For cast info, I have to rely on the puff pieces, reviews and specially, the official trailer descriptions.



TBH, official trailer descriptions are the best source for Bengali films/series to verify the cast but alas, they are PRIMARY. When nothing secondary is available, I would probably use the YouTube official trailer as the source and add "Secondary source needed" tag beside it. At least something is better than nothing. But in the worst scenario, if even the trailer description not supports it, then it stands at risk. If anyone removes it for being unverifiable, there would probably be nothing to do. 🥲 BhikhariInformer (talk) 15:54, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

I would like to know how you write the plot section when you haven't seen the movie or TV show in question, in light of the point you made. When I have to write an article, I often have trouble writing the plot summary, especially when I haven't seen the material. I haven't watched most of the contet, so sometimes this makes me put off writing the article for a while. I'm interested in how you are able to deal with this problem so well. Itcouldbepossible ^Talk 17:41, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

For films, I usually write a Synopsis of 4-5 lines that I get from the reviews. If there's a detailed Plot present in any of my film articles, it has been written by some other user.



For web series, it depends on my interest whether I'll write a short Synopsis or a detailed Plot. For most cases, I write a Synopsis after going through the reviews. But if I am highly interested in the series, I watch the "Web series explained" sort of videos on YouTube and write a detailed Plot from those. That saves a lot of time, compared to watching the complete series. BhikhariInformer (talk) 02:00, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kalavai, a link pointing to the disambiguation page University Grants Commission was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:05, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

Banglar Sera Bhooter Golpo creation

Sir, please create a descriptive article on Banglar Sera Bhooter Golpo seasons. I'm requesting you as you are a pro in writing web-series' articles. ~2026-22785-50 (talk) 14:34, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia. Thanks for reaching out. I checked the available sources for this web series and I am afraid that I won't be able to help you with this. Unfortunately, the web series doesn't meet any of the criterions of our notability guidelines for web series (WP:NTV). So, it doesn't qualify for a standalone article, as of now. Thanks -- BhikhariInformer (talk) 16:24, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Courtesy notification

There's an ongoing discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faheem Abdullah (2nd nomination). I'm notifying you, since you were a part of the previous discussion. Retro music11 (talk) 16:41, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for the ping! BhikhariInformer (talk) 01:39, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Anytime! Retro music11 (talk) 16:38, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	For your consistent and diligent work at Articles for Deletion. Your efforts in keeping Wikipedia free from promotional content and soapboxing are exactly the kind of behind-the-scenes contribution that makes Wikipedia better for everyone. Thank you for your dedication. Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 03:01, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

Thanks a lot 😊! You just made my day. This's the first barnstar for me....after so many years, at last someone recognized my contributions. 😭😭 BhikhariInformer (talk) 03:31, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

ː) you truly deserve more for all of the work you have put so farǃ Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 04:07, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

🙃 BhikhariInformer (talk) 05:18, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

A piece

I just wanted you to read carefully bellow: "Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material." Coverages about incident involving the subject counts towards GNG. SatnaamIN (talk) 08:48, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

I knew incident reportage were ROUTINE. But can you please explain what does this part mean - "but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material." Because, I am suddenly confused, after you have cited this and tagged me in multiple AFDs. 😅 BhikhariInformer (talk) 09:44, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

"but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material." means coverages don't need to keep shouting as "Xyz is an ... It was .. Xyz were" pattern. It means "ABC for Xyz is ... where.. Xyz was .." pattern also work. What we do when creating Biographical article? Don't we cite their works, incidents involving the person etc? See the fate of Dibrugarh University. You were hesitant to Keep, but I saved it. Not only that, check my AFD history, and see how many I have saved.

Try to be a "saver", not "deleter". There is no glory in deleting as it doesn't need much effort. But the saver needs lots of efforts. SatnaamIN (talk) 04:07, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for the clarification! BhikhariInformer (talk) 04:15, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

And please don't fall into the trap of Flyingphoenixchips. They are just deleting colleges and universitied they don't like. But they don't nominate anything from their own district. See their about page and this AfD. They even thrown me as an sock here. which I am not. SatnaamIN (talk) 04:21, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

Wait what!? There's an SPI running against you for being a sock? That's hilarious. Thanks for the warning....I will be more prudent in the future. BhikhariInformer (talk) 04:26, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

You don't believe? See here. They are so frustrated that I have beat them for many a times at AfD. They are being personal. SatnaamIN (talk) 04:41, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

Something for you

		The Purple Barnstar
		Well done at AfD. Keep rescuing. SatnaamIN (talk) 08:09, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

Thanks a lot! Honestly, I never expected this one. 😊😊BhikhariInformer (talk) 12:27, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

This is done.

Hi @BhikhariInformer. I don't think the third relist at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cloud9 IDE was necessary. There is a consensus for keeping the article, so I think this can be closed as such. You have my reassurance as the nominator knowing I won't be sending this to DRV. 11WB (talk) 14:27, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi @11WB. Thanks for the text! As of now, since the third relist hasn't completed 7 days, so should I give this a SNOW close now? BhikhariInformer (talk) 15:27, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

Relists aren't binding, and SNOW only applies to the first week if it is !voted en masse (which isn't the case here). A regular close is fine. 11WB (talk) 18:34, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

A new thought

Hey. I want you to be an NPR. Shall I nominated you for the right? You are well deserved for the right and qualified per your AfD status. SatnaamIN (talk) 07:22, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

Thank you so much for considering me for the right. I'm truly grateful to you, for showing confidence in my AfD contributions.



However, I personally feel that I still have a lot to learn, and need to gain more experience and understanding before taking up NPR responsibilities. So, for the time being, I don't think I'd be able to take on the responsibility.



Thank you once again for your encouragement and support — it really means a lot to me. BhikhariInformer (talk) 10:22, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

Ok then. Later you must try. SatnaamIN (talk) 00:34, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

Sure 😊 BhikhariInformer (talk) 02:41, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

Your AfD closure

Hi, please note that Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Žinčica shoud've been closed as speedy keep because it was WP:WITHDRAWN. Could you kindly update your closure? FaviFake (talk) 12:38, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for the ping! I've updated the closure. I guess I missed the Speedy box in a hurry. 🙃 BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 13:26, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Thanks! FaviFake (talk) 13:32, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Heya, since I see you often close merge nominations (thank you for your AfD work, by the way!), I wanted to ask you if you could kindly also update the tag on the destination article from "{{merge" to "{{merging" when closing as "merge" (example) or remove the tag when closing as "keep" and others. XFDcloser unfortunately doesn't do this automatically (it's being worked on) so I've been doing it manually, but maybe you could help me out with that :)   FaviFake (talk) 21:24, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for guiding me trough this! Honestly, I thought all the tag updating jobs on both the pages were completed by XFDcloser. Oh god.....I've closed so many merge AfDs....I'm really really sorry that you had to do the extra work which should have been done by me. All due to my ignorance that resulted in those partially complete AfD closures. I'll ensure to not err in the future. Best regards, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 01:41, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

No don't worry! I'm partially to blame because I was the one that suggested to Twinkle's developer to automatically add the tag to the destination article, but the dev has been taking longer than previously expected to push out the related update to XFDcloser. In theory, closers shouldn't have had to know about this new procedure, but unfortunately things are going slower than planned. There's no way you could've learned about this change on your own and you weren't expected to :)   FaviFake (talk) 07:44, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit
  

TonyBallioni (talk) 03:03, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

Thank you ! BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 03:05, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

Autopatrolled

Hi there. I've declined your recent application for the above permission due to the recent copyright concerns with Draft:Basu Bati. As this was the only concern I had, I would encourage you to think about applying again after a few months. At that time I'd be happy to look at your application, if you wanted to submit it directly to me, although you're free to go back to WP:PERM too. Best regards, Arcticocean ■ 20:22, 11 June 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing my application! I understand the concern regarding the copyright issue. And I'll consider reapplying after a few months. Best regards, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 01:59, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	For impressive work in several film related articles Pinakpani (talk) 06:39, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

Concerning Marine le Pen

Hello, I have undone an edit which you accepted via pending-changes review; the edit changed the meaning of the sentence completely. The whole party is actually far-right, not only herself. Lectonar (talk) 08:06, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

Thanks! I probably misinterpreted it. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 08:09, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

Rakkhosh (2026 film)

Hi, i talking to you about the film Rakkhosh, which are deleted! recently, i found one another review by film director Masud Hasan Ujjal in Dhaka Post here (this review are published after 12 days release of the film but i don't found it that time!) and another one review are from Prothom Alo here (this review was mentioned in previous deletion)

Now, can i re-create the article? what is your opinion? Aqsis Bey (talk) 14:35, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

Yup! With two bylined reviews in RS, now it meets NFILM. So, you can re-create the article.

There is another way. You can ask an administrator for a refund of the deleted article. (Best will be to approach Spartaz, who deleted the page in both AfDs). If you inform him about the second source you've found, he might restore the deleted article in draftspace or your userpace. You can then add the second review and move it to mainspace.

So, you can choose any of the two paths...as you feel right! Thanks! BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 15:29, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

I will selected you honorary for this request to administrator! then it can be easier for me! Aqsis Bey (talk) 15:39, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

Alright.... I'll request him! BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 15:49, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

Thanks a lot!🥰 Aqsis Bey (talk) 15:53, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

@Aqsis Bey The article has been restored in draftspace by admin Spartaz - Draft:Rakkhosh (2026 film). You can add the second review and then submit the page for reassessment.

I've a small suggestion - the "Response" section in the article is a bit confusing. What you can do is - create a separate section titled - "Critical reception". And je duto review ache....add them under that section. Cheers! BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 04:48, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

Thank you so much for your valuable time and contribution! Aqsis Bey (talk) 05:43, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

I added the second review, should i submit this page as a draft now? or move to the mainspace? Aqsis Bey (talk) 07:35, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

I'll suggest to submit this for review, instead of moving directly to mainspace. But before that, it will be better if you fix the concerns raised through the cleanup tag on the page. But if you want to move it directly to the mainspace, it's your call. Cheers! BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 09:07, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

Hi, i submitted the article for review (here Draft:Rakkhosh (2026 film)), if there are any mistakes, i would request you to correct these! Aqsis Bey (talk) 05:44, 2 July 2026 (UTC)

I've made some visible fixes....regarding the grammar and expressions....and also improved the phrasing and wording in certain parts. Hope the writing won't be an issue now. Cheers! BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 06:21, 2 July 2026 (UTC)

Thanks a lot again! Aqsis Bey (talk) 06:26, 2 July 2026 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jamalaye Jibonto Bhanu poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jamalaye Jibonto Bhanu poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

Money Honey (TV series)

Hi, i hope you are doing well.

Recently, you are nominated for deletion the tv series "Money Honey", thank you for looking into this and for your input. Since you mentioned you found one review during your BEFORE search, could you please share which one it was? This will help us evaluate the existing coverage and see what we might need to add. Thanks! Aqsis Bey (talk) 21:48, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

I found only this review. And now I've also linked it in my nomination rationale. Best regards, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 00:17, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

I also found another review. Interestingly, that particular review was published two months after the series' initial release on June 6, 2019. In contrast, the review you referenced was published on November 14, 2021 just two days after the series was re-released as a Director's Cut on November 12, 2021. Aqsis Bey (talk) 04:07, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for digging it out, but the review isn't bylined. So, I wouldn't consider it to be useful. You can post it at the AfD, to see what others think of the second review. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 04:12, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

didn't you notice any names at all? If you look at the very bottom, you should be able to find the names of the editor and publisher. In my opinion, that is sufficient to establish the reliability of this newspaper. It is a common practice for this publication to credit names at the end of the article! Aqsis Bey (talk) 04:50, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

Those names indicate that they are post-holders at the media house, but it isn't evident anywhere that they are associated with writing this particular review. For a bylined piece, names are usually present either at the top or the bottom of the review, not at the bottom of the page (like this one). BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 05:00, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

Wikipedia guidelines state that the subject must have "received full-length reviews in two or more GNG-worthy publications". It is important to note that a named critic is not a strict requirement here, the emphasis is explicitly on "full-length reviews".

The review published in The Daily Sun is indeed a full-length review, as it comprehensively analyzes the web series' storyline, direction, dialogue-screenplay, cinematography and performances. It is common practice for reliable media outlets, including major publications like The Times of India or others news outlets to sometimes publish reviews under a staff or editorial byline (e.g., "A critic of Times of India") rather than an individual critic's name.

Furthermore, the guideline specifies "GNG-worthy publications", and The Daily Sun is widely recognized as a reliable secondary source that meets GNG standards. Therefore, this review should be considered valid!

I hope this helps clarify the situation. Aqsis Bey (talk) 05:37, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

Let's WP:DROPTHESTICK here. I'll suggest that you present the Daily Sun review at the AfD. Let's see what the community determines. If others agree that the Daily Sun review is considerable, I won't mind withdrawing my nomination. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 05:45, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

I hope we can reach a consensus on this matter here, and i honorary request to you, you can check several other accepted reviews (hare ,, , ,, , , ,, , , , , , ) across Wikipedia to see if they all contain individual author bylines. All of them do not, yet they are many actively used as (a critic of "news outlet name")! these are just a few examples, as there are numerous other sources that follow the same pattern. Aqsis Bey (talk) 06:41, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Nandita Roy

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Nandita Roy, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A unsupported parameter error. References show this error when you use a parameter name that does not exist. Please replace the parameter with one that the template supports, or remove it if no such parameter exists. (Fix | Ask for help). Below are the references causing this error:
  • Ganguly (16 July 2024). "Icche turns 13: Nandita Roy and Shiboprosad Mukherjee's debut Bengali film celebrates a legacy of family, success, and cultural impact". The Times of India. Retrieved 19 June 2026. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |first 1= ignored (|first1= suggested) (help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:13, 19 July 2026 (UTC)

Thanks! Fixed it. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 17:19, 19 July 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nandita Roy, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bengali cinema was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:13, 19 July 2026 (UTC)

Hogue Town and McKeen AfD Closures

I'd like to ask you to reconsider your closes of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hogue Town, Illinois and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/McKeen, Illinois as redirects. I understand that ATD is preferred over deletion whenever possible, however nobody addressed the noiminator's concern that there is no evidence of these being "unincorporated communities" in the first place. A redirect isn't a viable option when the topic fails WP:V. –dlthewave ☎ 02:52, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for bringing this to my attention! After having another look at the discussions, I agree that the WP:V concern wasn't adequately addressed before I closed them. I've therefore requested administrative assistance (lest I miss any procedural steps) for reopening the AfDs so the issue can receive further discussion. Best regards, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 03:57, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

They've been reopened. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 06:19, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

School AFDs

I noticed you have been involved in school related AFDs. I have nominated a few more schools as they mostly rely on primary source and don't establish notability. Would appreciate your input on those AFDs as well. You can see my nominations here Coderzombie (talk) 11:09, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads-up! I've had a look and have !voted on the AfDs you nominated. I'll keep an eye out for any future nominations as well. Best regards, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 14:36, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Page discussion

Hi @BhikhariInformer,

I'm not sure if you deal with this, but I recently came across this page for an agricultural school in India that I'm not sure whether it should be blown up and started over. The college certainly seems NOTABLE based on my BEFORE that I did... but the page right now is basically one giant advert complete with it only being sourced from "sources" purely from the institution itself. I did an analysis and concluded that deleting everything would pretty much render only the title and possibly the infobox left, pulling it below the threshold of keeping as a stub. The page also contains extreme amounts of COPYVIO that are so major, I'm also not sure what to do about those. Could you look at this page please and what do you think?

Thanks, Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:54, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Hi @Filmssssssssssss,

I went through the article and I agree that the current version is nothing but a blatant ADVERT. Full of promotional wording, primary sources and huge chunks copied from the college website. I noticed that the website contents are licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0, so the copyright situation is probably not that serious. But that does not solve the larger issue of the article being overly promotional and dependent on primary sources.

Since the college appears to have enough coverage to warrant a standalone article, I think the best approach will be to clean-up everything except the infobox and start from scratch, just like you suggested. Best regards, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 00:58, 9 August 2026 (UTC)