Jump to content

User talk:Amitchell125

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 days ago by JacobTheRox in topic Good article nominations RfC

Good article reassessment for Kingdom of East Anglia

[edit]

Kingdom of East Anglia has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 20:38, 2 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

January music

[edit]
story · music · places

Mozart music for today! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:54, 15 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

20 January is the 100th birthday of David Tudor (see my story) and the 300th birthday of Bach's cantata Meine Seufzer, meine Tränen, BWV 13, if we go by date instead of occasion as he would have thought, so see my story for last Sunday, and celebrate ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:40, 20 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

List of largest empires map

[edit]

Hi! We discussed editing File:Combined map - British and Mongol Empires.svg a while back at Talk:List of largest empires#Map, specifically adjusting the Mongol Empire's borders to match this map and citing the book it's from. Do you think you could help with this? I would do it myself if I had the know-how. TompaDompa (talk) 21:06, 17 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi, if you give me the information I need, I can adjust the map accordingly and amend the accompanying text.. Regards, Amitchell125 (talk) 21:08, 17 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
The map to use can be found at the following link: https://ia801600.us.archive.org/BookReader/BookReaderImages.php?zip=/25/items/ost-geography-atlasworldhistory/AtlasWorldHistory_jp2.zip&file=AtlasWorldHistory_jp2/AtlasWorldHistory_0097.jp2&id=ost-geography-atlasworldhistory&scale=2&rotate=0. The source is O'Brien, Patrick K., ed. (2007). "The Mongol Empire 1206–1405". Philip's Atlas of World History (Concise ed.). Institute of Historical Research, University of London. p. 98. ISBN 978-0-540-08867-6. TompaDompa (talk) 21:20, 17 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
A tricky map to use! The projection used make the job 10 times more difficult than it should be, so can I suggest the map here? Amitchell125 (talk) 15:41, 20 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
That works for me. The objection that was raised was that the map was unsourced, so as long as it is possible to cite a reliable source we should be good. TompaDompa (talk) 15:51, 20 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Amitchell125: Any update on this? TompaDompa (talk) 16:06, 22 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
I came out of hospital a few days ago - you are now on my list again! Amitchell125 (talk) 17:54, 22 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
I'm sorry to hear that—I hope you're okay! Take the time you need, of course. TompaDompa (talk) 17:58, 22 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
@TompaDompa: I have done the best I can - the north of the Mongol Empire was not accurately define on any map I could find. Amitchell125 (talk) 16:53, 24 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thank you very much, I have added File:Combined map - British and Mongol Empires a.svg to the List of largest empires page. TompaDompa (talk) 16:59, 24 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Edits at Great Meadow, Ukraine

[edit]

Hello. Thank you for improving this article that I've created. I noticed that you've now twice removed information about Velyki and Mali Kuchuhury, calling it "off-topic" in your reasoning. These are major landforms in the area, which were especially prominent during the reservoir's existence, and are also covered by the Grand Meadow National Nature Park, so I believe they deserve a mention in the geography section. Could you explain why you consider this to be off-topic? Thanks. Shwabb1 taco 17:40, 13 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Shwabb1: I intend to ensure that recent events and aspects of the area are discussed in the article, but the Great Meadow as a lowland area was lost in the 1950s, and the article needs to ensure readers understand this. Please bear with me, as I am currently restructuring the article. Amitchell125 (talk) 17:48, 13 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
Alright. Though I don't have any good sources for this at the moment, it may also be helpful to mention that these areas existed even before the 1950s as sand dunes (kuchuhury) that contrasted with the surrounding lowland (the elevation difference also being the reason why they did not get inundated). Shwabb1 taco 17:55, 13 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Shwabb1: Many thanks for the heads up! I have time on my hands as I am recovering from surgery at home, so please feel free to pass on any resources you find. Amitchell125 (talk) 17:59, 13 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
I just found this paper on the Great Meadow published in 1917 by Adrian Kashchenko. There's lots of information there that could be useful, including about Kuchuhury, specifically the section starting from "... але найбільше цікавого уявляє з себе у сій частині Великого Лугу урочище «Кучугури»" [... but the most interesting feature in this part of the Great Meadow is the "Kuchuhury" tract]. Parts of this source are primary but I think certain sections could still be used; tell me if this works for you. Also I don't mind translating sections if something's not clear (machine translations may be flawed, especially when it comes to old texts with occasional archaisms). Shwabb1 taco 18:34, 13 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

GA review of Dnieper reservoir cascade?

[edit]

Hi. I nominated Nile River for GA status today. I noticed that the Dnieper reservoir cascade article is also nominated and has a similar dam/river/waterfall theme. Are you interested in doing a review of each others' article? The GA process permits a pair of nominators to review each others articles, provided they perform objective reviews without any "quid pro quo" arrangements or promises. I've done this a few times in the past: it works well provided both editors are experienced with the GA process. I'm planning on taking the Nile article to WP:FA eventually, so I would welcome a strong, thorough GA review. Are you interested? Noleander (talk) 20:04, 13 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Noleander: I'm honoured by your offer, I haven't reviewed a GAN for a little while, and this one would be a big one, and might take a while. I might have to attempt it in stages if I accepted it. I'll confirm yes or no early next week. Amitchell125 (talk) 13:16, 14 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
Yes, it is a big article. No worries if you don't feel like doing it. Noleander (talk) 13:21, 14 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Noleander: I'm in, but I am working on another Ukrainian article at present, and need time to read what the Nile article says and what the article's references are like. I'll start the review in earnest in a week's time. Regards, Amitchell125 (talk) 10:08, 16 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
Okay, thanks. I'll start the Dnieper cascade soon. If you change your mind and decide you don't have time to do the Nile River, no big deal... just let me know. I don't want you to be stressed out in real life. Noleander (talk) 11:48, 16 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
Until you start the review, I may continue making small changes to the Nile article. Any changes would be relatively small (wording, pic captions, MOS, cites). I believe the article meets GA requirements now, but I'm looking ahead to the FA criteria. If ongoing small changes bother you, let me know and I can pause the polishing. Noleander (talk) 12:28, 16 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Noleander: Feel free to amend, I haven't made a start yet, and won't for a few days. Amitchell125 (talk) 12:31, 16 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your nomination of Dnieper reservoir cascade is under review

[edit]

Your good article nomination of the article Dnieper reservoir cascade is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Noleander -- Noleander (talk) 13:02, 16 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Category:Historic parks, heaths and woods of Norfolk has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

Category:Historic parks, heaths and woods of Norfolk has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mclay1 (talk) 03:37, 17 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Barnstar for you

[edit]
The Cartography Barnstar
For your cartographic improvements to Nile River. The map you created is an invaluable addition to the article, and will be of critical importance when nominating the article for FA status. And the map file is in SVG format! Noleander (talk) 18:14, 24 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your nomination of Dnieper reservoir cascade has passed

[edit]

Your good article nomination of the article Dnieper reservoir cascade has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Noleander -- Noleander (talk) 00:31, 27 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

story · music · places

Congratulations! Thank you also for your work on Roman Kofman, - can you perhaps update? I'll be able to look only tomorrow, and will have to start from zero knowledge. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:01, 27 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your work there! - (Travelling, I had no time for him until now.) I wonder why about your changes to the infobox. Coming from project opera, I'm used to a preference for {{person}} for classical people (see here), and empty parameters that will never be filled look like clutter to me. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:44, 2 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Query on Nile map

[edit]

Thanks again for building the map of Nile sources in Wiki Commons. I'm thinking of duplicating it to make a 2nd map showing tourist sights, hydropower plants, and cataracts. The SVG is fantastic: easy to remove the "sources" overlay graphics, and I can replace them with other graphic overlays. Question: the red outline of the Nile basin drainage is not editable, is that correct? I wanted to make a slight adjustment so the red drainage basin includes the Nile delta (in the far north). If the red line is not editable, no big deal: I'll just use a paint action to erase the unwanted portion of the red line, then draw a new red line in the new location. (I'm only asking in case the red line is supposed to be editable, and I'm using Inkscape wrong :-). Thanks again for making the map!!! Noleander (talk) 20:17, 1 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

It's not editable at present, your solution is one way of doing what you would like to do. Regards, Amitchell125 (talk) 21:04, 1 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
Got it, thanks. Noleander (talk) 21:50, 1 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

ITN recognition for Roman Kofman

[edit]

On 2 March 2026, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Roman Kofman, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 23:56, 2 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

story · music · places

Thank you for that! - Of the four topics I helped to bring to the main page, I'm most proud of a woman's work, so made it my story. As it happens, last year's story OTD was about the woman. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:30, 16 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

on Bach's birthday, a story about my joy --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:23, 21 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited St Nicholas Church, North Walsham, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Miserere was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 22:18, 10 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Destubathon of the Americas

[edit]

You are invited to participate in the Destubathon of the Americas, a contest/editathon which will run from May 1 to May 31. The goal is to destub as many of our 475,000+ stubs for the Americas (from Alaska down to Chile) as possible. A good chance to have fun in expanding many of our old stale stubs and win up to £2000 ($2680) in Amazon vouchers for expanding stub articles. Sign up in the Contestants/participants section on the contest page if interested. Even if not interested in prizes you are still warmly welcome to participate in it as an editathon! Hopefully we can achieve something significant in the month of May together! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:39, 15 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

April thanks

[edit]
story · music · places

Thank you for improving article quality in April! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:21, 22 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Today's story is about one of three bios I brought to today's main page: look and listen, an extraordinary woman in many respects. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:29, 30 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Barnstar: thanks for help with Nile article

[edit]
The Nile River Award
Awarded in appreciation for your helpful review of the Nile article on its road to Featured Article status. Your assistance was essential. Thanks! Noleander (talk) 15:04, 9 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

May music

[edit]
story · music · places

Today: Felicity Lott. If you have little time, just give me a click ;) - If you have more, see her story. If you have more, listen to her singing Friendly Vision. If you have more, listen until she sings the word "peace" (Frieden), floating up high, serenely. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:28, 20 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

June 2026 GAN Backlog Drive

[edit]
Good article nominations | June 2026 Backlog Drive
June 2026 Backlog Drive:

Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process?

  • On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles reviewed.
  • Mentors are available, and new reviewers (<6 reviews) get bonus points!

Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.

Other ways to participate:
You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:58, 25 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Varvara Adrianova-Peretz.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Varvara Adrianova-Peretz.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 15 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

June music

[edit]
story · music · places

Today is the centenary of King Roger, an opera by Karol Szymanowski who is pictured on the main page, - my story with the trailer of the performance I saw. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:10, 19 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Amitchell125. Thank you for your work on Francis Cunningham Woods. Another editor, Tony Holkham, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Well-sourced and interesting. Thank you.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Tony Holkham}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Tony Holkham (Talk) 23:02, 12 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:2022 Crimean Bridge explosion aftermath.webp

[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:2022 Crimean Bridge explosion aftermath.webp requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file from a commercial source (e.g. Associated Press, Getty Images), where the file itself is not the subject of sourced commentary. If you can explain why the file can be used under the non-free content guidelines, please add the appropriate non-free use tag and rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 999REAL 💬 02:17, 20 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Good article nominations RfC

[edit]

Hi Amitchell125,

There is an ongoing Request for Comment (RfC) at Wikipedia:Good article nominations/August 2026 RfC, which you may be interested in because in the past year, you have nominated or reviewed more than one good article nomination. This message has also been sent to all subscribers to the Good Article Gazette. The RfC contains many proposals (33 at the time of writing), which are split into the following categories: nominators, reviewers, reviews, volunteer roles, reviewing initiatives, and others. However, you are more than welcome to add any proposals of your own that you wish to put to the community.

By the end of September, all the proposals will have been closed by an uninvolved editor, either as a consensus for one of the options or with no consensus. At this point, editors will be invited again to develop these proposals into coherent policy and implement them.

Thank you for your contributions to the good articles project, and I look forward to your input! (in solidarity), JacobTheRox(talk|contributions) 16:02, 11 August 2026 (UTC)Reply