User talk:AlmoerCapone
Add topic| This is AlmoerCapone's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless that text is available under a suitable free license. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:
- Copying text from other sources
- Policy on copyright
- Frequently asked questions on Wikipedia's copyright policy
- Policy and guideline on non-free content
If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.
- Introduction
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! 🇵🇸🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦🇵🇸 18:02, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 6)
[edit]
- User:Ali Boutemtam78/sandbox may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
 |
Hello, Ali Boutemtam78!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🇵🇸🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦🇵🇸 18:02, 6 May 2025 (UTC) |
Wikipedia and copyright
[edit]
Hello Ali Boutemtam78! Your additions to User:Ali Boutemtam78/sandbox have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:
- Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
- Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
- Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
- Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § Licensing.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 18:32, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Mike Inik (May 16)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mike Inik and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Mike Inik (June 16)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mike Inik and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Mike Inik (July 11)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mike Inik and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
July 2025
[edit]
Hi Ali Boutemtam78! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Apollo 8 several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Apollo 8, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:17, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
September 2025
[edit] Hello, I'm Jonesey95. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Sanrizuka Struggle, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:16, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
- I can add a link i just forgot. Ali Boutemtam78 (talk) 11:01, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
October 2025
[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Abraham Lincoln, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.
Please review WP:OVERLINKING - FlightTime (open channel) 19:21, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
- Just because it can be linked, doesn't mean it should be. Cheers, - FlightTime (open channel) 19:24, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Tacyarg. An edit that you recently made to Draft: Mike Inik seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is usually unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Tacyarg (talk) 19:28, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
- Hi, Ali Boutemtam78. I think you used AI in Draft:Battle of Lilly too. Please don't do this. Tacyarg (talk) 08:08, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at MIDI Maze, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 11:38, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
Hi Ali Boutemtam78! I noticed that you recently made an edit at Asmongold and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. On Wikipedia, "minor edit" refers only to superficial edits that could never be disputed, such as fixing typos or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not minor, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Marcus Markup (talk) 21:46, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
National varieties of English
[edit] Hello. In a recent edit to the page Kong Hwa School, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.
For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the first author of the article used.
In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Tacyarg (talk) 19:26, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Mike Inik (October 1)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mike Inik and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
- @Ali Boutemtam78 Do you have any questions about how to cite sources? Citing and verifiability is our most important policy. qcne (talk) 19:41, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 1
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Apartheid, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indians. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Lilly (October 3)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle of Lilly and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Lilly (October 6)
[edit]- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle of Lilly and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Pictures and captions
[edit]Dear Ali Boutemtam78, please note that if you add an image to an article, this is not a minor change, and images should be typical for the article's subject. Furthermore, a caption is not a "citation". Thank you. Medusahead (talk) 08:20, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
October 2025
[edit] Hi Ali Boutemtam78! I noticed that you recently made an edit and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. On Wikipedia, "minor edit" refers only to superficial edits that could never be disputed, such as fixing typos or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not minor, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Medusahead (talk) 09:01, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
The picture in the "Sudanese civil war (2023–present)" article.
[edit]
Hello Ali, I hope you are having a good day.
It might improve the article "Sudanese civil war (2023–present)" to remove or edit the picture that you added to the article under the "Casualties and war crimes" section. I List some reasons below.
- The picture is too blurry to be able to see what's going on, and the caption only specifies that it is war crimes. There is no way to actually know that war crimes are in the picture, and it is just as likely that the picture depicts livestock.
- After using Google image search to find the origin of the picture, I found that there is no reputable source covering the image. The only discussions regarding the picture seems to come from X/Twitter and other such social media websites.
- The origin of the picture is questionable, it seems to come from Google Maps satellite view, specifically the coordinates 10°57'39.0"N 26°24'52.0"E on Google Maps.
-If the picture is from Google Maps, the copyright is very likely incompatible with Wikipedia's.
- If the picture is from Google Maps, the picture would not constitute as "Own work". Even if it is a screenshot.
If you still consider the image good to stay on the article, then that's no problem. I just felt that it could be good to bring up some concerns I had regarding the image.
And if you choose to keep the picture I also want to tell you that the first word in the caption is not capitalized.
Anyways. I hope you have a good day and sorry if I made a mistake or misunderstood something, I am quite new to Wikipedia's guidelines. In any case, Thanks for helping improve Wikipedia. :)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 4
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nazino tragedy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Special settlement.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Mike Inik (December 5)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mike Inik and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Introduction to contentious topics
[edit]
You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 00:39, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 6
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mokele-mbembe, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Basin was added.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
March 2026
[edit]
Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at North Sentinel Island, you may be blocked from editing. Diff: Special:Diff/1342182062. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 15:36, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Lilly
[edit] Hello, Ali Boutemtam78. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Lilly, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:08, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Battle of Lilly
[edit]
Hello, AlmoerCapone. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Battle of Lilly".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 06:32, 6 April 2026 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
[edit]You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days, and you are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any page within this topic.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
Hello hello! I saw an edit you made to add a diagram of the damages you made to the OKC article. I reverted your edit, and just wanted to give you some constructive reasoning as to why. My first concern was a typo—the words on your graph said "DAMEDGE" instead of "DAMAGE." Second, scale—graphs like these are helped very much when given a scale to show how much damage there exactly was. Since this was focused on a building, maybe you'd use a scale of square feet. Third, the shapes. Your graph's damage outline was made up of mostly squares, and didn't quite extend as far into the building as the damage went. You can see it a little better in this image uploaded by the FBI—the damage had a lot of curvy shapes and extended a little over the middle of the building. Of course, it doesn't necessarily have to be exact. Apologies if I seem mean or rude, I just want to help you improve your graph and add it back into the article later!
Much love, rock on!
P.S. Love all the other graphs you have on your user page.
⚠︎ ArkadenBoden ⚠︎ (talk) 15:30, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
- Sorry about the the spelling error it was also hard to recreate the exact Damage AlmoerCapone (talk) 16:32, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
- No problem at all! I just wanted to see what I can offer as far as feedback. It doesn't really have to be exact, I just wanted to help you improve your graph-making.
- Much love, rock on as always!
- ⚠︎ ArkadenBoden ⚠︎ (talk) 16:55, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
- @ArkadenBoden Thank you I should give you a barn star I think that's what it's called. AlmoerCapone (talk) 18:52, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
- And also thank you I am new to making graphs :) AlmoerCapone (talk) 16:34, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
CS1 error on Short-tailed grasswren
[edit]
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Short-tailed grasswren, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:44, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
CS1 error on Different conscription methods
[edit] Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Different conscription methods, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:01, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit] |
The Writer's Barnstar |
| Good work on the Nogogo chimp war YunYunYune (talk) 15:35, 27 April 2026 (UTC) |
AfC notification: Draft:Mike Inik has a new comment
[edit]
CS1 error on Village of Doom
[edit] Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Village of Doom, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:57, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Lake County Superior Court mass shooting has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 24% of accepted submissions, well done! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
- See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.
Future articles
- Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.
- Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Next steps
- Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
- Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
- You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
- Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
- The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
- For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
ChrysGalley (talk) 10:22, 6 June 2026 (UTC)Speedy deletion nomination of Village of Doom
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Village of Doom requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, as it exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications is prohibited on Wikipedia. For further information, see section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find it difficult, please ask for help at the Teahouse. ~ oklopfer (💬) 07:28, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
CS1 error on Village of Doom
[edit] Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Village of Doom, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:58, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
Village of Doom moved to draftspace
[edit]Thanks for your contributions to Village of Doom. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. In solidarity, nil nz 02:37, 24 June 2026 (UTC)