Jump to content

User talk:Aleain

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 hour ago by ~2026-44908-71 in topic Promo

For previously archived talk articles, see here.

Help with this new page pls

[edit]

I created a new page with a full list of all executions in Singapore since 1965, do you think this page is too messy or has any other issues? I'm trying to make sure it's up to this website standards, and since you worked a little bit on the Capital punishment in Singapore page, I would like to hear your thoughts on this. - List of executions in Singapore

Malaysia Day

[edit]

Hi Aleain, after your work on Malaysia Day, do you think it has enough sources to be added to Wikipedia:Selected anniversaries/September 16? There is only one obviously unsourced paragraph, but you may have a clearer picture. CMD (talk) 03:52, 2 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi CMD, thanks for your feedback. I think it's well referenced enough for inclusion, though I've added a few more sources for good measure. I've hidden some parts for now where I could not find solid references, especially the bit about supposed advocates preferring to mark Hari Merdeka on 31 August instead of Hari Malaysia on 16 September on the grounds that Malaya and Malaysia were the same country. Almost all of the Malaysian sources I have come across discuss the differences, but very few mention West Malaysians favouring one date over the other. The stronger voices tend to come from East Malaysians who want Hari Malaysia to be given more prominence. Aside from that, the article looks fine. Aleain (talk) 07:23, 2 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
Makes sense, can always readd items if sourcing is found. I've restored the article to the September 16 OTD. CMD (talk) 07:42, 2 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Clarification on COI tagging on ST Engineering

[edit]

Hi! just to clarify on your COI tagging on ST Engineering, I am not in the position of interest conflict given that I am not an employee, nor the company is my client in any form. The expansion of the article is solely out of my interest in information sourcing out of my free time. as for flagging of promotional content, by all means and feel free to neutralise it where you see fit. Cheers! :) JohnLim99 (talk) 10:06, 6 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, on second thought I do believe you are not affiliated with ST Engineering. That said, the article still comes across as rather advertorial in tone and relies quite a bit on primary sources, with many of the citations being directly linked to stengg.com. Aleain (talk) 16:04, 6 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Speed Limits on Singapore MRT

[edit]

Hi, I have noticed you have specified the design speed limit as the operating speed which is inaccurate as per Mass Rapid Transit (Singapore) and numerous sources that can be found online such as SGTrains or the individual train model wiki pages. Please provide your sources if you believe your edits are accurate. 39.109.214.95 (talk) 21:45, 27 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

SGTrains is not a reliable source and you shouldn't cite Wikipedia on Wikipedia. Aleain (talk) 08:49, 28 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
Noted! I have found reliable sources for the maximum operating speed for the North South, East West and Circle Lines but not the others. In the meantime I have removed the speeds for the other lines as there are no sources backing your edits either. Cheers! 39.109.214.95 (talk) 09:35, 28 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mobile Legends: Bang Bang, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Android. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ  Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 2 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

ITN recognition for Tang Liang Hong

[edit]

On 7 October 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Tang Liang Hong, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Schwede66 04:24, 7 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Alexis Dang

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Aleain. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Alexis Dang, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:09, 7 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Definition of 'resident'

[edit]

Hi there, You said that for consistency, it's best to use the local term. However the result of this is that any non-Singaporean reading this page will understand it to claim that 19% of people living in Singapore are Christians. That is the standard English meaning of the phrase; no non-Singaporean would guess that DOS has redefined the word 'resident' to mean only the 2/3 of the population who have citizenship or PR.

I'm also not at all sure you can say this definition is the 'local' meaning, rather than just the meaning adopted by certain ministries. For example, among other things, the automated immigration gates when entering the country use the word 'resident' to apply to everyone who lives in Singapore, including people on LTVPs.

In any case, this is the English version of Wikipedia, and allowing every country's bureaucrats to redefine whatever words they like without even explaining this to readers would lead to a highly misleading mess of content.

In short, I suggest we use the word 'resident' to mean 'resident', and if you want to talk about people's visa statuses, just say that instead. Paticcasamuppada (talk) 12:36, 10 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi, your edits were not incorrect, but making that change would mean applying the same changes across many other related articles as well. In the local context, the term "resident" is used broadly for matters concerning race and religion, not just Christianity. Aleain (talk) 14:16, 10 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
In that case I would suggest applying the same changes across any other articles that contain the same error. Because that is what this is: A mistaken usage of English, based on a politicised vocabulary formulated by bureaucrats with the intention of excluding 1/3 of the population from official statistics. Either Wikipedia uses correct English, or it does not; but at a minimum, if articles are going to adopt incorrect usage, they should all contain an explanatory note for readers who are not familiar with that usage.
I'd be happy to make the same change to any other Singapore-related articles that contain this error. Paticcasamuppada (talk) 15:06, 10 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Hi, I have added a note accordingly on Religion in Singapore as well as on the articles of each individual religion. Aleain (talk) 20:27, 13 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Malagasy peoples
added a link pointing to Yoruba
Merina people
added a link pointing to Indians

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 17 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1969 race riots of Singapore, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bumiputera.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 28 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 18 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

I've been reading your contributions page; thanks for all the anti-vandalism against TAs you've done

[edit]

Also, Bukit Panjang station is definitely the best place to eat grilled chicken; it's not like we have fines for eating and drinking on public transport Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 15:36, 30 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, my friend! To be fair to the vandal, there's a 7-Eleven located within the station where you could indeed get a grilled chicken. Aleain (talk) 05:17, 1 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
Time to get fined :D Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 05:18, 1 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
Why do I feel like 220.255.60.227, on political pages, has had a pattern of violating consensus, being reverted, and falsely creating "consensus" to standardise something? Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 06:20, 4 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

On merging STARiS to Mass Rapid Transit (Singapore)

[edit]

I came across the latter while editing Alstom Metropolis C830C (I stalked your contribs), and saw the big purple merge tag at the top of the article

It was recommended to be merged to the MRT article, or more specifically, the "Rolling stock and signalling" section, according to the only person to vote keep at the AfD

The thing is, I checked the entire section... signalling cannot one, depots cannot one

How about the rolling stock subsection?

{{Main|List of Singapore MRT and LRT rolling stock#Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) rolling stock}} (nice)

And then the main article is like, "here's a list"

At this point, I believe that STARiS fails notability and should be deleted

If someone can prove that the system does meet notability, I'm happy to retain it as a separate article (I don't see any way to merge it to any other article without absurdity)

Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 12:40, 2 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

(yes, I'm still topic-banned from administrative stuff, so if there's an AfD 2, I won't be there) Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 12:44, 2 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
Honestly, after a quick look through the SMRT Active Route Map Information System article once again, it seems like the whole page could simply be turned into a redirect to Mass Rapid Transit (Singapore) without losing any meaningful information. Nearly all of the content appears to be original research written by train enthusiasts and even the parts that are cited rely on YouTube videos and a dead Instagram post.
There is only one citation on the article from The Straits Times which is now archived because the original link was deleted by ST. I feel that the concept of STARiS as a whole is trivial and does not need to be mentioned at all, since LCD displays are hardly unique to Singapore's MRT. Also, I personally find STARiS 2.0 pretty ugly and I am quite relieved that it was not installed on the newer trains... Aleain (talk) 13:05, 2 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
"Also, I personally find STARiS 2.0 pretty ugly and I am quite relieved that it was not installed on the newer trains"
Idk lol
I have to agree tho, an LCD is no cause for nationalism
Edit: boldly redirected both STARiS and SMRT Active Route Map Information System to Mass Rapid Transit (Singapore) (diffs: STARiS; SMRT Active...)
Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 01:54, 3 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Temporary account IP viewer granted

[edit]
The temporary account IP viewer logo, composed of the Wikipedia globe with a user and an IP address

Hello, Aleain. Per your request, your account has been granted temporary-account-viewer rights. You are now able to reveal the IP addresses of individuals using temporary accounts that are not visible to the general public. This is very sensitive information that is only to be used to aid in anti-abuse workflows. Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Temporary account IP viewer for more information on this user right. It is important to remember:

  • You must not share IP address data with someone who does not have the same access permissions unless disclosure is permissible as per guidelines listed at Foundation:Policy:Wikimedia Access to Temporary Account IP Addresses Policy.
  • Access must not be used for political control, to apply pressure on editors, or as a threat against another editor in a content dispute. There must be a valid reason to investigate a temporary user. Note that using multiple temporary accounts is not forbidden, so long as they are not used in violation of policies (for example, block or ban evasion).

It is also important to note that the following actions are logged for others to see:

  • When a user accepts the preference that enables or disables IP reveal for their account.
  • Revealing an IP address of a temporary account.
  • Listing the temporary accounts that are associated with one or more IP addresses (using the CIDR notation format).

Remember, even if a user is violating policy, avoid revealing personal information if possible. Use temporary account usernames rather than disclosing IP addresses directly, or give information such as same network/not same network or similar. If you do not want the user right anymore then please ask me or another administrator and it will be removed for you. You may also voluntarily give up access at any time by visiting Special:Preferences. Happy editing! Extraordinary Writ (talk) 08:17, 7 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! Aleain (talk) 09:15, 7 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
Hey!!! Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 06:46, 9 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Agoda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 18 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

About a certain anti-Chinese Malaysian vandalism account

[edit]

This is about Sayaanakmalaysia92 (talk · contribs)

From your contribs, you took them to ANI because they were vandalising Chinese-related articles

That discussion got archived without action

Apparently they're still at it, since they got reverted for suppressing controversies on the article of an Indian Malaysian minister

Thoughts? Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 00:07, 19 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

If no one is going to take action, there's not much we can do other than simply reverting their disruption. Aleain (talk) 03:43, 19 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
...and I'm topic-banned anyways
Good luck man Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 04:23, 19 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
You're topic-banned for now, it's still possible for the restrictions to be removed with a successful appeal down the road (at least 3 months, as the admin mentioned). Aleain (talk) 05:46, 19 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thanks lol Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 05:59, 19 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Happy Holidays!

[edit]
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2026!

Hello Aleain, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2026.
Happy editing,

Icepinner (Come to Hakurei Shrine!) 15:53, 24 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Aww thanks! Best wishes to you too :) Aleain (talk) 17:03, 24 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

I see that User:Gnomingstuff accused you of AI usage at the article "1959 Singaporean general election"

[edit]

specifically, this diff

You may want to take that to their talk page ngl Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 03:46, 25 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Not worth the effort, they have falsely accused me before. Based on their contributions I'm not the first and won't be the last user (example) that they have made false accusations against. Their talk page is also filled with other users calling out Gnomingstuff's false positives only to be responded to in an impertinent manner. Aleain (talk) 03:54, 25 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
Have you ever sought the administrators' attention for this? Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 03:55, 25 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
It wouldn't be long before some other user takes more offence with their accusations and escalates it. I'm not too fussed about this really. Aleain (talk) 04:00, 25 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
I gnomed too hard and too rough and got a topic ban; they may need one of 'em Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 04:14, 25 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
Wouldn't be long. Aleain (talk) 05:32, 25 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Downtown Core, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marina Bay.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 25 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

lol thanks

[edit]
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2026!

Hello Aleain, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2026.
Happy editing,

Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 06:41, 26 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 06:41, 26 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Autopass Card, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NETS.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 1 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

About User:EatChickenNuggets

[edit]

This user has been extremely invested (I'd say to SPA levels, even) in retaining Yishun Town Secondary School as a proper article

Per page history, they first reverted my initial redirect, saying that the revert was to the "last good ver." (manual revert tag sold separately; in this case, not sold)

I reverted them back and added {{R from school}}

They told me in an edit summary to read Wikipedia:WikiProject Schools/Article advice, and you reverted them

For obvious reasons, they reverted you, so I reverted back with an edit summary of "no"

If you see User talk:EatChickenNuggets, our attempt to discuss is not hammering out, so I decided to contact you lol Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 14:15, 1 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Could probably take this to WP:ANI if it continues. I also doubt ECN is a new account, tbh. Aleain (talk) 14:30, 1 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
WP:NOTHERE I believe Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 03:31, 2 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
Yep, they haven't shown interest in anything else since full protection
Must be an SPA Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 02:45, 3 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Aleain. Thank you for your work on Financial Secretary of Singapore. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for writing the article, your work is greatly appreciated! Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

SunDawn Contact me! 11:14, 3 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! You too! Aleain (talk) 11:21, 3 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

I was combing through the list of unassessed Singapore articles, and this one seems to be a deep-fried (insert food that should only ever be steamed here)

[edit]

Talk:Community Development Council Vouchers Scheme#This article appears to be AI-generated Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 12:48, 5 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Whether it was AI-generated or not, I don't think the CDC voucher scheme is even notable for Wikipedia. Aleain (talk) 19:44, 8 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
On the other hand...
"If you see the RfCs, there's a consensus that 2 or 3 secondary sources are enough to establish notability" – JASWE
Bruh Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 23:22, 8 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
Anyways, could you take a look at Politics of Singapore and see if there's any other improvements that can be done? Aleain (talk) 05:37, 9 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
I guess so, but Wikipedia is not compulsory... meh Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 05:40, 9 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
If you're willing, how about improving 2025 Singaporean general election such that it passes the on-hold GAN? Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 05:44, 9 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
Sure Aleain (talk) 05:49, 9 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
:3 Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 05:49, 9 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Whyiseverythingalreadyused, if you like to quote me, please quote it correctly. You cannot find it anywhere in the guidelines but in AFD discussions etc, you will find the minimum acceptable is 2 or 3. It is a community unofficial minimum. RFCs and AFDs (given as an example) are very pretty different venues. ~ JASWE (talk) 07:43, 27 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – January 2026

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2025).

Administrator changes

added
readded Fathoms Below
removed

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration


What in the actual f-

[edit]

Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 09:23, 12 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Lol, nice find. And it's been that way since 2017. Aleain (talk) 09:39, 12 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
WP:RfPP/D? Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 10:09, 12 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
I mean RFPPD Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 10:10, 12 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
Also, the protecting admin got desysopped at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kudpung
Couldn't bro have just ECP'd or semi'd the redirect? Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 10:18, 12 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, seems like an overreaction by the ex-admin. You could request a protection decrease. Aleain (talk) 10:22, 12 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
Tban lol
How about you? Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 10:26, 12 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
Sure, I forgot about that. Sorry. Aleain (talk) 10:36, 12 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
dw lol Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 10:42, 12 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

About the Australian ISA man...

[edit]

If the original incarnation of the article states in Wikivoice that the PAP has an "agenda for Malays to stray away from Islamic values and assimilate into the Chinese community", congratulations, I highly doubt the creator's competence, especially given that he's been on Wikipedia since 2019 and extended confirmed since October 2024 (estimation from rough scroll through Special:Contributions/N niyaz) Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 11:00, 14 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

It has mostly been cleaned up now, but it would be worth to continue keeping an eye on this article. The original written version is definitely a concern. Aleain (talk) 11:06, 14 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
lol yeah
Chinese Singaporeans are not oofing Islam, that's for sure Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 11:08, 14 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hold on... oh shit, oversightable message
An abbreviated summary: a 78-year-old man says in the message that his 77-year-old wife went to, I believe, a Meet-the-People Session in the Teck Ghee division of Ang Mo Kio GRC, asking for K. Shanmugam's attention for a divorce application
Great day to see NOTHERE stuff amirite? Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 14:25, 14 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
Undetected since 2022? Damn. Perhaps you could contact robertsky for this? Aleain (talk) 14:54, 14 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
I would love to email the oversight people but I'm not confident about the tban... idfk Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 15:17, 14 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
I forgot to also say that our man revealed the full names of both himself and his (at least then) wife Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 16:27, 14 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
...again, the competence may be absent Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 15:09, 15 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 15 January 2026

[edit]

~2026-35244-4 (talk)

[edit]

I was reading stuff when I checked Catholic Junior College because I saw on YT that it was slated to be moved to Punggol

Except I saw a grammatical error in the sentence about the move... so I checked the history and it was added by a TA

For some reason, I got interested and checked the Special:Contributions and realised that the account had engaged in vandalism on the now-semi'd Hwa Chong Institution

Upon a closer inspection of Special:Contributions, I found that the account had vandalised Boon Lay too, among other articles ("a" -> "an awesome" in intro; summary claimed a grammar fix... I totally trust that when you can't write a full English sentence with proper grammar) Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 06:06, 17 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Incredibly ironic... Aleain (talk) 07:36, 18 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
Ah yes, the China Time-honored Brand (not that I use American English) of bullshit edit summaries Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 10:34, 18 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
Also, for obvious reasons, we Singapore editors need to Make Keep 2025 Singaporean general election Great Again
(MAGA reference) Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 12:46, 18 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
Seems like our dear friend ThomisticCreature and this TA is the same person. Aleain (talk) 13:04, 18 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
whispers hey Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 13:29, 18 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Good Article Gazette, Issue 10

[edit]
Issue 10, 18 January 2026
Current statistics
  • Number of GAs: 43,188 (+87)
  • Number of nominations: 900 (+23)
  • GAs for reassessment: 68 (+9)

-- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:28, 18 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:10, 18 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Ah yes...

[edit]

... Je-suis-Pritamism Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 18:17, 21 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

LLM accusations

[edit]

Why do you believe that this comment is "an LLM response"? WhatamIdoing (talk) 23:08, 22 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Aleain, I'm still hoping to get an answer to this question. You have accused someone of using an LLM. Even if you no longer think that's true, it would be helpful to know how you came to that conclusion. For example, is there an essay somewhere that you relied on, and perhaps it could be improved? WhatamIdoing (talk) 02:05, 25 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

About ThomisticCreature

[edit]

If you check out User talk:ThomisticCreature#January 2026, they are, as always, displaying a massive NOTHERE attitude and making threats of vandalism reports (except this time, they're on their final warning for disruptionspecifically, Special:Diff/1334559361 (already reverted)at Izzy Einstein and Moe Smith

I wouldn't be surprised to get accused of vandalism ngl Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 08:40, 24 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Also, I saw your Special:Contributions; this is a pretty long list of Chens to impersonate Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 08:41, 24 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
ThomisticCreature is a rage-baiter, I wouldn't bother interacting with them. Someone will deal with them eventually. Aleain (talk) 06:41, 25 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
I'm not confident about that... the admin (JBW) who reviewed them said that they were mostly good-faith and accused me, PhilKnight, and MakaylaHippo1998 of ganging up against a new editor Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 07:30, 25 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
(for context, we three issued warnings against their vandalism) Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 07:31, 25 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

question for you

[edit]

Hi there! Before posing my question, I just like to add some context to my question first. As an editor, I like to look back at my contribution history and see whether other editors made changes to articles I have edited previously. To see whether my edits are okay, missing things etc. I noted that you seems to be following my contribution history? Is my assumption correct?

I monitored changes to Singapore related articles via this link which I published on my page and I welcome any editor to monitor the changes and help to fix vandalism etc. You could have been doing the same thing as well. I noted that after I edited Malaysia, you are the next editor after 9 hours to edit the article, your contribution history around the period does not indicate you are editing related articles that could have directed you there. Also, Malaysia's article being edited does not show up on the link (as above). I decided to check my interaction timeline with you and noticed that there is a possibility that you are following my edits. I might be wrong since we are afterall editing within a small scope (aka Singapore related articles).

Again, my question is are you following my edits? And if yes, why? I like to note that there is nothing wrong with following another editor's edits. I am just curious, is that whether are you following my edits, that's all. ~ JASWE (talk) 08:05, 27 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hey there, I am not particularly tracking your edits. I often check Special:Recentchangeslinked/Wikipedia:WikiProject Singapore/Index of Singapore-related articles in my free time to improve articles, make miscellaneous changes, or revert vandalism. Since that page collates all Singapore-related articles and we're both active in this topic area, it is inevitable that we will occasionally edit the same pages within short intervals. Please trust that I am not personally stalking you, even if it might appear that way. Aleain (talk) 08:44, 27 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
Oh yeah, I also just noticed you mentioned that Malaysia is not on the list. I manually monitor selected Malaysia-related articles on my watchlist as well. Apologies for any misunderstanding. Aleain (talk) 08:47, 27 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
No worries. Not worried about stalking. Some edits have a lengthy period but could have been triggered by others. The interaction timeline is unable to show that and I decided to just pop the question to you for a faster response. End of the day, it is just a clarification of doubts on my side. Thanks! ~ JASWE (talk) 08:59, 27 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 29 January 2026

[edit]

Good Article Gazette, Issue 11

[edit]
Logo: Good Article Gazette - the official GAN newsletter
Logo: Good Article Gazette - the official GAN newsletter
Issue 11, 30 January 2026
Ongoing discussionsNewsCurrent statistics
  • Number of GAs: 43,228 (+40)
  • Number of nominations: 968 (+68)
  • GAs for reassessment: 64 (–4)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:23, 30 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Express notification delivery lol Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 19:01, 30 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Bro

[edit]

Why does at least one person apparently feel the need to invoke Muhammad in an article about a Singaporean politician? Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 02:38, 8 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – February 2026

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2026).

Arbitration

  • Due to the result of a recent motion, a rough consensus of administrators at the arbitration enforcement noticeboard may impose an expanded topic ban on Israel, Israelis, Jews, Judaism, Palestine, Palestinians, Islam, and/or Arabs, if an editor's Arab-Israeli conflict topic ban is determined to be insufficient to prevent disruption. At least one diff per area expanded into should be cited.

Miscellaneous


The Signpost: 17 February 2026

[edit]
  • Disinformation report: Epstein's obsessions
    The sex offender's attempts to whitewash Wikipedia run deeper than we first thought.
  • Crossword: Pop quiz
    Sharpen your pencil. How well do you really know Wikipedia?

Good Article Gazette, Issue 12

[edit]
Logo: Good Article Gazette - the official GAN newsletter
Logo: Good Article Gazette - the official GAN newsletter
Issue 12, 20 February 2026
Ongoing discussionsNewsCurrent statistics
  • Number of GAs: 43,446 (+218)
  • Number of nominations: 841 (–127)
  • GAs for reassessment: 46 (–18)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 20 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Uh... help?

[edit]

I've been dealing with this apparently WP:NOTHERE editor (User talk:EnnisNatsume) who recreated the redirect NUS Business School as an article with complete promotion (for proof, see Special:Permalink/1339924986)

I reverted the re-creation and warned them that they had an obvious COI which needed to be disclosed, and was less than impressed when they pasted the {{paid}} template directly into a reply using the visual mode

That template said that they had been paid by Boston College (presumably relevant to their edits on Boston College Carroll School of Management, which had never seen a COI disclosure)

When I warned them that they had engaged in WP:UPE and asked them to put the template on their user page, they again pasted it directly into the reply, except this time it claimed payment by the University of Colorado Boulder

I'm not sure what to do + I need to sleep; do you have ideas or the time to deal with this user? Thanks bro Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 14:15, 23 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

I'd say not much action required for now unless they start edit warring over it. Then I'll make an post on ANI. Aleain (talk) 16:47, 23 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
:) Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 00:15, 24 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – March 2026

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2026).

Administrator changes

removed

CheckUser changes

removed Ks0stm

Oversight changes

removed Ks0stm

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

  • Following a motion, remedy 9.1 of the Conduct in deletion-related editing case has been amended to limit TenPoundHammer to one XfD nomination or PROD per 24-hour period.
  • Following a motion, the Iskandar323 further POV pushing motion has been rescinded.
  • The Arbitration Committee has passed a housekeeping motion rescinding a number of outdated remedies and enforcement provisions across multiple legacy cases. In most instances, existing sanctions remain in force and continue to be appealable through the usual processes, while some case-specific remedies were amended or clarified.

Miscellaneous


Notification of administrators without tools

[edit]
Greetings, Aleain. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title:
  • Thank you for supporting this effort. Your contributions are an integral part of overall success, and an example for others to follow.
  • To stop receiving these notifications, remove your name from the list.

TolBot (talk) 21:00, 4 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

FYI

[edit]

Special:Diff/1342270102 Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 01:52, 8 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 10 March 2026

[edit]
  • Special report: What actually happened during the Wikimedia security incident?
    A horrifying exploit took place, which could have had catastrophic and far-reaching consequences if used maliciously; instead, it seems to have happened by accident and was used for childish vandalism. How did this happen, and what did the script actually do?

Notification of administrators without tools

[edit]
Greetings, Aleain. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title:
  • Thank you for supporting this effort. Your contributions are an integral part of overall success, and an example for others to follow.
  • To stop receiving these notifications, remove your name from the list.

TolBot (talk) 21:00, 11 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Notification of administrators without tools

[edit]
Greetings, Aleain. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title:
  • Thank you for supporting this effort. Your contributions are an integral part of overall success, and an example for others to follow.
  • To stop receiving these notifications, remove your name from the list.

TolBot (talk) 21:00, 17 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

About Draft:Vasunas pte ltd

[edit]

I saw that... idr when

But then I checked the creator's contributions, and they all consist of alleging without proof that Johnny Lau founded a company which went bankrupt (massive BLP violation lol)

Any ideas? Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 09:34, 19 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

(perhaps nvm for now; I gave them a {{subst:uw-biog3}} lol) Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 15:04, 21 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Notification of administrators without tools

[edit]
Greetings, Aleain. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title:
  • Thank you for supporting this effort. Your contributions are an integral part of overall success, and an example for others to follow.
  • To stop receiving these notifications, remove your name from the list.

TolBot (talk) 21:00, 19 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for fixing the part about fuel subsidy in Malaysia!

[edit]

I would like to thank you for improving my edit on fuel subsidy in Malaysia! :) LuigiMcpe4549 (talk) 02:01, 26 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
Thank's for improving my edit :) LuigiMcpe4549 (talk) 02:33, 26 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
You're welcome! Aleain (talk) 23:21, 26 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Gasoline and diesel usage and pricing
added a link pointing to The Business Times
Subsidy reforms in Malaysia
added a link pointing to The Business Times

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 26 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 31 March 2026

[edit]

Administrators' newsletter – April 2026

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2026).

Administrator changes

added
removed

Checkuser changes

removed Giraffer

Oversight changes

added Kj cheetham
removed Giraffer

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

  • Following a motion, the GSCASTE extended-confirmed restriction in the Indian military history case has been narrowed. It now applies to caste-related topics in South Asia, and the preemptive protection remedy has been amended accordingly.
  • The arbitration case Pbsouthwood has been closed.
  • The arbitration case Maghreb has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case will close on 7 April.

Notification of administrators without tools

[edit]
Greetings, Aleain. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title:
  • Thank you for supporting this effort. Your contributions are an integral part of overall success, and an example for others to follow.
  • To stop receiving these notifications, remove your name from the list.

TolBot (talk) 21:00, 6 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Notification of administrators without tools

[edit]
Greetings, Aleain. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title:
  • Thank you for supporting this effort. Your contributions are an integral part of overall success, and an example for others to follow.
  • To stop receiving these notifications, remove your name from the list.

TolBot (talk) 21:00, 11 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Ok, I may be dealing with an SPA ring here

[edit]

Any ideas on how to deal with User talk:Whyiseverythingalreadyused § Non-Mandarin Chinese romanisations? Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 03:35, 13 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Nvm; the D in BRD was difficult, but we're doing it at WT:SG Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 04:48, 13 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 21 April 2026

[edit]

Notification of administrators without tools

[edit]
Greetings, Aleain. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title:
  • Thank you for supporting this effort. Your contributions are an integral part of overall success, and an example for others to follow.
  • To stop receiving these notifications, remove your name from the list.

TolBot (talk) 21:00, 24 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Notification of administrators without tools

[edit]
Greetings, Aleain. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title:
  • Thank you for supporting this effort. Your contributions are an integral part of overall success, and an example for others to follow.
  • To stop receiving these notifications, remove your name from the list.

TolBot (talk) 21:00, 25 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Notification of administrators without tools

[edit]
Greetings, Aleain. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title:
  • Thank you for supporting this effort. Your contributions are an integral part of overall success, and an example for others to follow.
  • To stop receiving these notifications, remove your name from the list.

TolBot (talk) 21:00, 26 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Good Article Gazette, Issue 13

[edit]
Logo: Good Article Gazette - the official GAN newsletter
Logo: Good Article Gazette - the official GAN newsletter
Issue 13, 27 April 2026
Ongoing discussionsNewsCurrent statistics
  • The Good Article Gazette is back after a two month break!
  • Number of GAs: 43,784 (+338)
  • Number of nominations: 951 (+110)
  • GAs for reassessment: 64 (+18)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:00, 27 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Tong (English surname)

[edit]
Notice

The article Tong (English surname) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability, not a disambiguation, and source doesn't seem to support claims (no page number given in reference). Fram (talk) 13:02, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on Talk:Tong (English surname)the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Fram (talk) 13:02, 30 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – May 2026

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2026).

Administrator changes

readded
removed

Interface administrator changes

removed L235
added Chaotic Enby

CheckUser changes

removed

Oversight changes

removed Moneytrees

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Changes to user permissions made from Meta are now included in the local user permissions log (T6055).
  • The autoconfirmed user group will soon be modified such that the four-day account age requirement begins when an account makes its first edit (T418484).

Arbitration

  • The arbitration case SchroCat has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case closed on 15 April.
  • Per a recent motion, appeals of blocks from the conflict-of-interest VRT queue are, by default, appealed on-wiki through the normal unblock process. However, they may be heard by the Committee if COIVRTers disagree on the interpretation of the evidence or believe ArbCom would be better suited to hear the appeal. Administrators are also advised that loosening or lifting such blocks without the consent of someone with access to the queue or ArbCom can be grounds for desysopping.
  • Per a recent motion, restrictions issued directly by the Committee may now be enforced with blocks which work exactly like contentious topic blocks.
  • The arbitration case Maghreb has been closed.

Miscellaneous


Notification of administrators without tools

[edit]
Greetings, Aleain. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title:
  • Thank you for supporting this effort. Your contributions are an integral part of overall success, and an example for others to follow.
  • To stop receiving these notifications, remove your name from the list.

TolBot (talk) 21:00, 18 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Good Article Gazette, Issue 14

[edit]
Logo: Good Article Gazette - the official GAN newsletter
Logo: Good Article Gazette - the official GAN newsletter
Issue 14, 18 May 2026
Ongoing discussionsNewsCurrent statistics
  • The next GAN backlog drive will be held in June and will be co-ordinated by four editors. It will be mainly targeted towards those who are new to reviewing.
  • Number of GAs: 43,883 (+99)
  • Number of nominations: 980 (+29)
  • GAs for reassessment: 74 (+10)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:56, 18 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 22 May 2026

[edit]
  • Recent research: WikiLambda the Ultimate
    Does Abstract Wikipedia help fight "One ring to rule them all" solutions for knowledge access - or does it implement one itself?
  • Gallery: Earth Day and Mother's Day
    Earth Day was on 22 April, and Mother's Day was on 10 May (in the US and many other countries).

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Aleain. Thank you for your work on Prince Edward Road (Singapore). Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for writing the article. Have a nice Sunday!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

SunDawn Contact me! 13:57, 24 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! Aleain (talk) 18:21, 24 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

A brownie for you!

[edit]
Thanks to your contributions and comments, List of Singapore MRT stations is now FL! Have a brownie as a token of gratitude. Icepinner (Come to Hakurei Shrine!) 04:15, 1 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
You're welcome! Congratulations to you as well! Aleain (talk) 10:10, 1 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – June 2026

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2026).

Administrator changes

added
readded
removed

Bureaucrat changes

removed

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Mandatory 2FA for bureaucrats: Bureaucrats without two-factor authentication (2FA) enabled have already lost access to their advanced rights on 26 May. Those who do not enable 2FA may be automatically removed from the groups in mid-June 2026, and from that point onward, new members must have 2FA enabled before they can be added. (T423119, T423120)

Arbitration

  • The arbitration case SchroCat has been closed.
  • The arbitration case Michael Jackson has opened. Evidence submissions in this case closes on 1 June.

Miscellaneous


Good Article Gazette, Issue 15

[edit]
Logo: Good Article Gazette - the official GAN newsletter
Logo: Good Article Gazette - the official GAN newsletter
Issue 15, 1 June 2026
Ongoing discussionsNewsCurrent statistics
  • Number of GAs: 43,915 (+32)
  • Number of nominations: 1033 (+53)
  • GAs for reassessment: 42 (–32)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:03, 1 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
Thank you for taking the time to vote in the Restore Britain RfC! Matthew-Hopkins1981 (talk) 01:39, 3 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Note

[edit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jurong_FC&diff=prev&oldid=1358251563

Please revert, serial vandal sock is reported Эльдар Шукоров (talk) 11:47, 8 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 21 June 2026

[edit]

Administrators' newsletter – July 2026

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2026).

Administrator changes

added
removed

CheckUser changes

readded
removed

Oversight changes

readded
removed L235

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


Good Article Gazette, Issue 16

[edit]
Logo: Good Article Gazette - the official GAN newsletter
Logo: Good Article Gazette - the official GAN newsletter
Issue 16, 7 July 2026
Ongoing discussionsNewsCurrent statistics
  • Number of GAs: 44,338 (+423)
  • Number of nominations: 906 (-127)
  • GAs for reassessment: 34 (-8)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 7 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 13 July 2026

[edit]
  • News and notes: An exclusive club
    Wikipedia Co-Founder Larry Sanger gets a community ban for canvassing.
  • In the media: Battle for a soul – who won?
    Commissars, winners and losers, blocks or bans, a Wiki red card, social engineering on wikis, and Swift action!

Good Article Gazette, Issue 17

[edit]
Logo: Good Article Gazette - the official GAN newsletter
Logo: Good Article Gazette - the official GAN newsletter
Issue 17, 21 July 2026
Ongoing discussionsNewsCurrent statistics
  • Number of GAs: 44,471 (+133)
  • Number of nominations: 921 (+15)
  • GAs for reassessment: 26 (-8)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 21 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Good Article Gazette, Special issue

[edit]
Logo: Good Article Gazette - the official GAN newsletter
Logo: Good Article Gazette - the official GAN newsletter
Special issue - 28 July 2026
With several major discussions underway
Ongoing discussionsCurrent statistics
  • Number of GAs: 44,523 (+52)
  • Number of nominations: 954 (+33)
  • GAs for reassessment: 26 (-8)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:04, 28 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 2 August 2026

[edit]
  • On the bright side: The beautiful game
    2026 Men's FIFA World Cup, Wikimania music, and wikipress.
  • Traffic report: Odyssey and Oyarzabal
    To take you in the sun to (Ithaca), to show you the World Cup, it's the time of the season for editing!

Notification of administrators without tools

[edit]
Greetings, Aleain. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title:
  • Thank you for supporting this effort. Your contributions are an integral part of overall success, and an example for others to follow.
  • To stop receiving these notifications, remove your name from the list.

TolBot (talk) 21:00, 2 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – August 2026

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2026).

Administrator changes

added
removed

CheckUser changes

readded

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Miscellaneous


Good article nominations RfC

[edit]

Hi Aleain,

There is an ongoing Request for Comment (RfC) at Wikipedia:Good article nominations/August 2026 RfC, which you may be interested in because in the past year, you have nominated or reviewed more than one good article nomination. This message has also been sent to all subscribers to the Good Article Gazette. The RfC contains many proposals (33 at the time of writing), which are split into the following categories: nominators, reviewers, reviews, volunteer roles, reviewing initiatives, and others. However, you are more than welcome to add any proposals of your own that you wish to put to the community.

By the end of September, all the proposals will have been closed by an uninvolved editor, either as a consensus for one of the options or with no consensus. At this point, editors will be invited again to develop these proposals into coherent policy and implement them.

Thank you for your contributions to the good articles project, and I look forward to your input! (in solidarity), JacobTheRox(talk|contributions) 16:02, 11 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Notification of administrators without tools

[edit]
Greetings, Aleain. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title:
  • Thank you for supporting this effort. Your contributions are an integral part of overall success, and an example for others to follow.
  • To stop receiving these notifications, remove your name from the list.

TolBot (talk) 21:01, 16 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Promo

[edit]

Hello and thanks for the promotional content alert on Foldable smartphone. I saw it today and decided to completely change the article. All the crap content about company X announcing device Y have been removed and I've instead put neutral info or key devices that launched new form factor categories like the tri-folds. I've made further big expansions and references to fill in information about physical styles and further developments of the form factor like glass displays and hinge changes all from neutral tech sources rather than bending to manufacturer promotional stuff so everything is now more cleaner and unbiased. I hope the result is good and you can remove that notice if you agree the article is now in a healthy state. --~2026-44908-71 (talk) 00:06, 17 August 2026 (UTC)Reply