User talk:Adrikshit

February 2026

Hello, I'm Sid95Q. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Nadiya Ke Paar (1982 film) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Sid95Q (talk) 03:54, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Nadiya Ke Paar (1982 film)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Nadiya Ke Paar (1982 film), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:02, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sohagara Temple (February 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Absurdum4242 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

You’ve made a good start to this article, but unfortunately as yet it lacks sufficient sources which prove notability. It requires 2-3 sources which are reliable, independent, secondary sources, which talk at length about the topic of the article. Unfortunately the sources you have so far aren’t quite there. Please try to find some sources which talk about the temple in depth, but which are not published by any group with ties to the temple. Good luck 👍

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sohagara Temple and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Absurdum4242 (talk) 13:42, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Adrikshit! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Absurdum4242 (talk) 13:42, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bhojpuri Paintings (March 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by JesusisGreat7 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bhojpuri Paintings and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jesus isGreat7 14:02, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sohagara Temple (March 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Abdullah1099 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sohagara Temple and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Abdullah1099 (talk) 08:25, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

whats the reason for disapproval? I have already added more sources. Adrikshit (talk) 14:55, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

First it's need more expansion of subject and correct placement of citation and other improvement. Also i doubt did you used LLM for creating this draft, by seeing the tone and placement of citation. Abdullah1099 (talk) 15:05, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

For expansion, it needs to first approved as sturd so that others can contribute in expanding it.

No, I havent uses LLM lol. Its just a simple paragraph. Calling it LLM generated is baseless.

What is the definition of correct citation ? Adrikshit (talk) 16:41, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

There are multiple problems one of which is those citation that are put in a line rather than put on each statements. I only doubt you using LLM but i hope you not used LLM as you told. Hoping you can improve and resubmit the draft for approval. Abdullah1099 (talk) 14:50, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

April 2026

Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Far far, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 13:39, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Mahendranath Temple has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mahendranath Temple. Thanks! Commandant Quacks-a-lot (talk) 18:56, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bhojpuri Paintings (April 23)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, User4edits, left the following feedback:

This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources.

• Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.
• Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute.

Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.

Previous comments have not been worked on. Please source the article properly.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Bhojpuri Paintings to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 16:02, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

Mirzapur Editing

Kindly proper sources before edits. And if you are a Bhojpuri speaker and have love for this dialect ( apparently the govt of India does not consider it as a language), this does not mean you can put anything without any reference And if someone has written, please discuss before changing or reverting. For your kind information a majority of the district speaks a variety of Awadhi. This is not a platform to show language greatness or dominance. Abhisheks 91 (talk) 03:14, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

once again a bogus claim by Awadhi speaker to impose Awadhi on Mirzapur.

No census document mention that Awadhi is spoken in mirzapur, yet you guys keep changing to Awadhi breaking wikipedia policy of vandalism. I am previously mention that thing and even mentioning now that keep your love for Awadhi to yourself. Wikipedia works on fact, not on emotional grudges. Adrikshit (talk) 15:56, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

i would ask you to first read all the books and cited source and then do engage in reverting here. i would also advise you to read awadhi and it's type and moreover geographical variation according to many linguistics. Abhisheks 91 (talk) 11:16, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

I have already done that and checked sources but it still doesnt fit the criteria of verifiable and trusted source. Books were written decades ago and geographical representation doesnt not match with current scenario. Hence it will reverted. Adrikshit (talk) 21:43, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

Moreover I have one thing to say please ponder on that, If 80 percent report hindi here as their mother tongue here, what dialect they are speaking. It must be some dialect. I would again urge you to read as many articles sources and also visit the eastern and western areas of districts you will, notice the change in language. I would appreciate it if you don't change further and even if you any doubt drop me on my talk page and discuss. Abhisheks 91 (talk) 11:25, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

change in language and change is dialects are two different things. Bhojpuri spoken in mirzapur is western dialect of bhojpuri. Adrikshit (talk) 21:44, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

May 2026

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Far far, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 23:07, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Purabi (music)

Hello, Adrikshit. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Purabi (music), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:07, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Purabi (music)

Hello, Adrikshit. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Purabi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:16, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Don Stupa

Hello, Adrikshit. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Don Stupa, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:07, 11 July 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Sohagara Temple

Hello, Adrikshit. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sohagara Temple, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:06, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Don Stupa

Hello, Adrikshit. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Don Stupa".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 16:23, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Mahendranath Temple

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Mahendranath Temple. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Mahendra Nath Temple, Siwan. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Mahendra Nath Temple, Siwan. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Bihari Editor ^(Talk) 10:56, 15 August 2026 (UTC)