Jump to content

User:Gabobaby/sandbox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

yo, wussup?

Charge conjugation in particle physics

[edit]

Charge parity of


Formalism

[edit]

Consider an operation, , that transforms a particle into it's antiparticle

.

Both states must be normalizable, so that

which implies that is unitary,

.

By acting on the particle twice with the operator,

,

we see that and . Putting this all together, we see that

,

meaning that the charge conjugation operator is Hermitian and therefore a physically observable quantity.

Eigenvalues

[edit]

For the eigenstates of charge conjugation,

.

As with parity transformation, operating twice with is symmetric and must leave the original particle's state unchanged,

allowing for eigenvalues of , which is called the C-parity or charge parity of the particle.

Eigenstates

[edit]

The above implies that and have exactly the same quantum charges, so only truly neutral systems those where all quantum charges and magnetic moment are 0 are eigenstates of charge parity, that is, the photon and particle-antiparticle bound states: neutral pion, η, positronium... The neutron is not an eigenstate because it has a magnetic moment, and so does not have an associated C parity.

Multiparticle systems

[edit]

For a system of free particles, the C parity is the product of C parities for each particle.

In a pair of bound bosons there is an additional component due to the orbital angular momentum. For example, in a bound state of two pions, π+ π with an orbital angular momentum L, exchanging π+ and π inverts the relative position vector, which is identical to a parity operation. Under this operation, the angular part of the spatial wave function contributes a phase factor of (−1)L, where L is the angular momentum quantum number associated with L.

.

With a two-fermion system, two extra factors appear: one comes from the spin part of the wave function, and the second from the exchange of a fermion by its antifermion.

Bound states can be described with the spectroscopic notation 2S+1LJ (see term symbol), where S is the total spin quantum number, L the total orbital momentum quantum number and J the total angular momentum quantum number. Example: the positronium is a bound state electron-positron similar to an hydrogen atom. The parapositronium and ortopositronium correspond to the states 1S0 and 3S1.

  • With S = 0 spins are anti-parallel, and with S = 1 they are parallel. This gives a multiplicity (2S+1) of 1 or 3, respectively
  • The total orbital angular momentum quantum number is L = 0 (S, in spectroscopic notation)
  • Total angular momentum quantum number is J = 0, 1
  • C parity ηC = (−1)L + S = +1, −1, respectively. Since charge parity is preserved, annihilation of these states in photons (ηC(γ) = −1) must be:
1S0γ + γ          3S1γ + γ + γ
ηC: +1=(−1) × (−1) −1=(−1) × (−1) × (−1)

Experimental tests of C-parity conservation

[edit]
  • : The neutral pion, , is observed to decay to two photons,γ+γ. We can infer that the pion therefore has , but each additional γ introduces a factor of -1 to the overall C parity of the pion. The decay to 3γ would violate C parity conservation. A search for this decay was conducted[1] using pions created in the reaction .
  • [2]
  • annihilations[3]

References

[edit]
  1. MacDonough, J. (1988). Phys. Review. D38: 2121. {{cite journal}}: Missing or empty |title= (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  2. Gormley, M. (1968). "Experimental Test ofInvariance inFailed to parse (syntax error): {\displaystyle η→<mrow><msup><mrow>π</mrow><mrow>+</mrow></msup></mrow><mrow><msup><mrow>π</mrow><mrow>−</mrow></msup></mrow><mrow><msup><mrow>π</mrow><mrow>0</mrow></msup></mrow>} ". Phys. Rev. Lett. 21 (6): 402. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.21.402. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  3. Baltay, C (1965). "Test of Charge-Conjugation Invariance inFailed to parse (syntax error): {\displaystyle <mrow><mrow><mover><mrow>p</mrow><mrow>¯</mrow></mover></mrow></mrow>−p} Annihilations at Rest". Phys. Rev. Lett. 15 (14): 591. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.15.591. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)