Jump to content

Talk:Process

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Risk Engineer in topic Other uses

Geysers

[edit]

Geyser can be up to 600 feet when exploding

Apart from the question whether it actually took place or not, isn't it a bit strange to list Allah's creation of Man as a prototypical process and not as an act, as it is widely understood that God certainly had the intention to create when he initiated the whole process. Rinke Hoekstra 09:27, 20 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was move to Process. Joelito (talk) 16:50, 15 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Process is now a redirect to this page. There is no need for the "(general)" suffix on the page name. --Russ Blau (talk) 16:19, 5 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Support

[edit]

Support move, the disambig page shouldn't have a suffix. HGB 01:04, 13 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Oppose

[edit]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

On Process patentability

[edit]
I think a section on process patentability would be helpful.
Are processes be subject of patentes? To which extent and which conditions. MX == AGS == --Dagofloreswi (talk) 03:55, 24 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Singular process

[edit]

I removed the example "creation of the universe by God" since it doesn't fit the definition of a process as a trajectory in a system's phase space. I replaced it with a more reasonable example of a singular process. --Shastra 14:34, 4 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Systemic Functional Linguistics/Grammar

[edit]

A process is also a core concept in Systemic Functional Linguistics/Grammar (SFL or SFG) - 'process' is equivalent to 'verb'. There are different kinds of processes - material, behavioural, mental, verbal, existential, relational identifying, and relational attributive. All of these concepts are REALLY important in Applied Linguistics. Anyway, I don't know how to add to the page to include SFL 'process' - could somebody please let me know how? (And how to link to SFL/G?). Thanks. Jess. - 05:36, 1 January 2008 User:58.111.105.143

Please do not revert, Snowded

[edit]

I worked hard to follow the practices of Wikipedia:Disambiguation as well as Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Disambiguation pages, and Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts. There are guidelines on how to format disambiguation pages, and I studied them carefully and followed them. Please do not revert. Thanks, Star767 (talk) 01:24, 27 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

ON reflection this about the only one of your mutiple edits which makes sense so I will leave it. ----Snowded TALK 01:46, 27 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
Thanks very kind of you. Thank you so much. Perhaps you will reflect on some of me other edits that you reverted without reflection. You may see that I'm trying to improve quality here. Star767 (talk) 02:14, 27 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
I checked them all, this one was the only where you seemed to be acting reasonably. Be aware that mass changes over multiple articles with polemical edit summaries more or less aways results in your being reverted on sight. ----Snowded TALK 02:16, 27 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
Gregbard has been doing the same thing, reverting the removal of his spamming categories. Even though his spamming is against consensus at the Village Pump. I've never had any problems until I ran into Gregbard and his spamming. You didn't check them all, or you wouldn't have tag team reverted. Star767 (talk) 02:25, 27 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
Sigh ----Snowded TALK 02:26, 27 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

We need a Management heading ...

[edit]

I have come across a number of process articles that have some overlapping scope and therefore are difficult to work with. In particular, Process management, Process-based management are examples. I work in the project management area and find the articles too heavily oriented towards manufacturing. I rearranged the article as follows:

In thermodynamics

[edit]

(No changes)

In Management

[edit]

References

  1. Project Management Institute, Body of Knowledge (PMIBoK), 5th edition, 2013, Section 3, page 47

Other uses

[edit]

Cheers Risk Engineer (talk) 15:18, 8 October 2016 (UTC)Reply