Jump to content

Talk:Michael Jordan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 20 hours ago by Mazewaxie in topic Lede
Featured articleMichael Jordan is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on November 13, 2007.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 1, 2007Good article nomineeListed
February 24, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
March 20, 2007Featured article candidatePromoted
November 13, 2007Today's featured articleMain Page
On this day... A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on February 7, 2020.
Current status: Featured article

"MJ23" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect MJ23 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 May 17 § MJ23 until a consensus is reached. Go D. Usopp (talk) 00:51, 17 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

2026 Brickyard 400

[edit]

he won this race as an owner, should be added 23XIDK (talk) 10:57, 27 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

I don't follow NASCAR, so I ask why should single races like Daytona and Brickyard be included in the infobox while others like 2026 DuraMAX Texas Grand Prix are not mentioned? Mazewaxie (talkcontribs) 08:33, 30 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Mazewaxie There are four races which are considered the crown jewels: the Daytona 500, Coca-Cola 600, Brickyard 400 and Southern 500, so they usually get featured in the achievements. 23XIDK (talk) 08:44, 30 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Oh ok. So we should also mention them in the "Awards and honors" section? Also couldn't we have like "Brickyard 400 Winner (2025, 2026)" instead of two separate lines? Mazewaxie (talkcontribs) 08:50, 30 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Mazewaxie yes, we can do that. 23XIDK (talk) 21:14, 2 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

"His Royal Airness" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect His Royal Airness has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 August 3 § His Royal Airness until a consensus is reached. Mazewaxie (talkcontribs) 20:06, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Lede

[edit]

Hi. I was thinking about rewording the opening sentence in the lede with something similar to Babe Ruth, "is regarded as one of the greatest sports heroes in American culture and is considered by many to be the greatest baseball basketball player of all time."

Since they share a similar place in American culture and consideration among sports historian, I think it's fitting. Mazewaxie (talkcontribs) 17:02, 13 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Anything is better than opening with "American businessman". ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 17:38, 13 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Even at Ruth's page, "regarded as one of the greatest sports heroes" isn't directly sourced. And regarded by who? Presumably, "widely" and not just a few, but needs sourcing. —Bagumba (talk) 17:59, 13 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Greatest North American athlete of the 20th century by ESPN and second to Babe Ruth on the Associated Press' list of athletes of the century aren't enough? Mazewaxie (talkcontribs) 19:50, 13 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Jordan is debatably a global sports icon, not just American like Babe Ruth. "he was integral in popularizing the sport and the NBA around the world in the 1980s and 1990s" ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 20:17, 13 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Consider just stating those specific accolades directly instead of the WP:OR-ish observation. Per the WP:SUBSTANTIATE policy:

Another approach is to specify or substantiate the statement, by giving those details that actually are factual. For example: "John Doe had the highest batting average in the major leagues from 2003 through 2006." People may still argue over whether he was the best baseball player, but they will not argue over this.

Bagumba (talk) 21:36, 13 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
I mean, that would be the case for questionable statements.
Here you have Ali:
"A global cultural icon, widely known by the nickname "the Greatest", he is often regarded as the greatest heavyweight boxer of all time."
I already mentioned Ruth beforehand. Since Jordan is regarded at least in the same category as these other all time great athletes, isn't it a bit underwhelming to state "Jordan is considered to be one of the greatest basketball players of all time"? Mazewaxie (talkcontribs) 09:04, 14 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
There's multiple sources saying that Jordan's widely considered the greatest basketball player at Talk:Michael Jordan/Archive 6 § Greatest playerBagumba (talk) 16:43, 14 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
I went on to make this edit, appropriately sourcing the claim. Mazewaxie (talkcontribs) 20:11, 14 August 2026 (UTC)Reply